Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht

Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht

searchformecca.com
from searchformecca.com More from this publisher
31.03.2015 Views

790 EXPLORATIONS IN BIBLE LANDS sand years antedating our era. At this period there were only petty " Hittite " states. The inscriptions lead us to suppose that the conquest of Syria and the district to the north, with the apparent exception of Karkemish, in all probability proceeded from Cilicia, for several distinct kings of this group call themselves Cilicians, and Cilicia is spoken of in several of their inscriptions, even in cases when an actual connection with Cilicia is out of the question. The inscriptions prove the Cilicians to have been a subdivision of the " Hittites." Sargon of Assyria (722-705 b. c.) put an end to the " Hittite " rule over the country east of the Taurus. At what date the Hittites or their kindred first appeared in the district west of the Taurus remains still unsettled. From considerations stated above it does not seem impossible that the so-called Pseudo-Sesostris in the pass of Karabel near the coast of the i^gean Sea dates from before 1200 b. c. Somewhere about 850 b. c. and later there flourished in Cappadocia a kingdom, perhaps called Khamani, the kings of which have left us the magnificent Hittite sculptures and inscriptions at Boghazkoi. When the universal empire of the Assyrians, which had absorbed the petty " Hittite " states, w r as shattered to pieces, or perhaps a little earlier, the (i Hittite " nation lifted its head once more. It was led by Cilician kings under whom, perhaps 800 years before or even earlier, it had settled southeast and north from the mount of Amanus. About 600 b. c. we find a " Hittite" king of Cilicia, the king of the Bulgharmaden inscription, whose dominions, besides Cilicia proper, south of the Taurus, include Cataonia to the west, Khate to the east of the Taurus, and the territory of Karkemish on the Euphrates to the east. He styles himself perhaps also supreme lord of the Lycaonians, just as he does of the " Hittites." Another king of Cilicia has left an inscription found in ancient Lycaonia in which he per-

DURING lQTii CENTURY: HITTITES 791 haps styles himself king of Lycaonia. Between Kaisariye (Caesarea) and the Taurus there has been discovered an epitaph of a relatively late date, belonging to a Cilician, son of a Cilician. This expansion of the Cilician power in the final period is attested by Greek writers of later date. It explains how a Syennesis of Cilicia, in conjunction with a contemporary king of Babylon, undertook to reconcile Alyattes of Lydia and Kyaxares of Media. He of course divided the supremacy of Asia Minor with Alyattes and was the neighbor of the Babylonian monarch. It is also not improbable that the expedition of Necho, king of Egypt, undertaken in the direction of Karkemish, was directed not against Nebuchadrezzar of Babylon, but against a Cilician king to whom Karkemish already belonged, and whom Nebuchadrezzar came to assist. The latest inscriptions date probably from about 550 b. c. It is in the highest degree probable that the " Hittite " characters were superseded by the Aramaic during the Persian period. The supremacy then established in those parts by Persia may also explain why no further inscriptions of Cilician kings have been forthcoming since that time. After 550 b. c, all that we know of the Indogermanic inhabitants of Cilicia is contained in Cilician proper names of a later date. Some time about 500 b. c. we find Indogermanic " Hittite "-Armenians in Western Armenia. By what route they effected their entrance, or at what date, we do not know. It is not improbable that, as I suggested some years ago, the Cimmerian invasion into Asia Minor pushed them in this direction, and it is possible that their native seat oi Khate was the starting point of this displacement ot the Armenian people. It is equally possible, however, that as we also have found a Hittite in ancient Phrygia, these Armenian immigrants came from the west. This would

DURING lQTii CENTURY: HITTITES 791<br />

haps styles himself k<strong>in</strong>g of Lycaonia. Between Kaisariye<br />

(Caesarea) and <strong>the</strong> Taurus <strong>the</strong>re has been discovered an<br />

epitaph of a relatively late date, belong<strong>in</strong>g to a Cilician, son<br />

of a Cilician.<br />

This expansion of <strong>the</strong> Cilician power <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al period<br />

is attested by Greek writers of later date. It expla<strong>in</strong>s how<br />

a Syennesis of Cilicia, <strong>in</strong> conjunction with a contemporary<br />

k<strong>in</strong>g of Babylon, undertook to reconcile Alyattes of Lydia<br />

and Kyaxares of Media. He of course divided <strong>the</strong> supremacy<br />

of Asia M<strong>in</strong>or with Alyattes and was <strong>the</strong> neighbor of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Babylonian monarch. It is also not improbable that<br />

<strong>the</strong> expedition of Necho, k<strong>in</strong>g of Egypt, undertaken <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

direction of Karkemish, was directed not aga<strong>in</strong>st Nebuchadrezzar<br />

of Babylon, but aga<strong>in</strong>st a Cilician k<strong>in</strong>g to whom<br />

Karkemish already belonged, and whom Nebuchadrezzar<br />

came to assist.<br />

The latest <strong>in</strong>scriptions date probably from about 550 b. c.<br />

It is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> highest degree probable that <strong>the</strong> " Hittite "<br />

characters were superseded by <strong>the</strong> Aramaic dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

Persian period. The supremacy <strong>the</strong>n established <strong>in</strong> those<br />

parts by Persia may also expla<strong>in</strong> why no fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>scriptions<br />

of Cilician k<strong>in</strong>gs have been forthcom<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>ce that time.<br />

After 550 b. c, all that we know of <strong>the</strong> Indogermanic <strong>in</strong>habitants<br />

of Cilicia is conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Cilician proper names of<br />

a later date.<br />

Some time about 500 b. c. we f<strong>in</strong>d Indogermanic " Hittite<br />

"-Armenians <strong>in</strong> Western Armenia. By what route<br />

<strong>the</strong>y effected <strong>the</strong>ir entrance, or at what date, we do not know.<br />

It is not improbable that, as I suggested some years ago,<br />

<strong>the</strong> Cimmerian <strong>in</strong>vasion <strong>in</strong>to Asia M<strong>in</strong>or pushed <strong>the</strong>m <strong>in</strong><br />

this direction, and it is possible that <strong>the</strong>ir native seat oi<br />

Khate was <strong>the</strong> start<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t of this displacement ot <strong>the</strong><br />

Armenian people. It is equally possible, however, that as<br />

we also have found a Hittite <strong>in</strong> ancient Phrygia, <strong>the</strong>se<br />

Armenian immigrants came from <strong>the</strong> west. This would

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!