Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht

Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht

searchformecca.com
from searchformecca.com More from this publisher
31.03.2015 Views

780 EXPLORATIONS IN BIBLE LANDS According to the Assyrian inscriptions Mut(d)allu of Kommagene was also in possession of Melitene from 712 to 708 b. c. Hence it is in the highest degree probable that he is the king of the lion-hunt. Considerations which shall be given later place the matter beyond any doubt. From Mut(d)allu's inscription we get the word-group for Kommagene and Khati, two names which for the period to which the inscription presumably belongs have been preserved to us in the forms Kummukhi and Khati(?). Four inscriptions, all emanating from kings of the same realm, have been found northwest of the Taurus, while another apparently cognate with them, that on the bowl, has been discovered in the ruins of Babylon. One of these monarchs, according to his inscription, possessed at least the territory of Karkemish on the Euphrates, if not Karkemish itself; while according to the bowl inscription, another of them, perhaps the son or more probably the grandson of the former, was in possession of Karkemish itself. This bowl inscription, to judge from its character, must be one of the very latest of the so-called Hittite inscriptions. A king who bore sway at once over the land west of the Taurus and over the lands of Karkemish must have been lord of the intervening territory of Cilicia also. We know nothing of a temporary conquest of Cilicia in post-Assyrian times, to which date the inscription in question must belong, since according to it the territory of Karkemish is neither independent nor yet held by Assyria. It is therefore highly probable that the kings of these inscriptions were kings of Cilicia ruling also over the territory beyond the Taurus to the west, and that the hieroglyph for their country is that for Cilicia, the native form of which name would probably be Khilik with a vowel at the end, to judge from the Egyptian, Assyrian, and Greek transliterations. In the first line of his inscription, one of these kings, per-

DURING 19 CENTURY: HITTITES 781 haps the earliest of the series, calls himself king, not of Cilicia, but of something that perhaps has the same attribute as occurs in connection with the city of Karkemish in the Jerabis inscriptions. Unless, therefore, the kings of Cilicia, like those of Assyria, for instance, bore some general title like " king of the whole earth " or the like, we must suppose that Tarsus, the capital of Cilicia, is meant. According to the Assyrian and Aramaic writing of the name at the time to which the inscription belongs, about 600 b. c, the word must have been pronounced Tarz, or if the Biblical "Tiras " in Gen. 10 be identical with it, must have had the consonants Trds. This, accordingly, will be the form of the name in the inscription. There is one title which amongst all the Hittite sovereigns is peculiar to those of Cilicia. In the word-group which stands for it, the first symbol and the fourth are alike. From the frequency with which it occurs this symbol must have a simple phonetic value. As it is not one of the vowel signs, it must denote a simple consonant. At least three Cilician kings are called Syennesis in Greek. Only one, the father of one Syennesis, has a different name, Oromedon. From this observation it has been surmised for a considerable time that Syennesis is properly a title. The fact that in Herodotus the father of one king is called by a different name need cause no difficulty, for Syennesis may well have been the designation only of the reigning sovereign, who after death recovered his proper name, while his former title passed to his successor. This title Syennesis (borne by the kings of Cilicia) with its four stem consonants : s, the spiritus lenis between y and e, which we and the Greek do not write, n and s, has the peculiarity that its first consonant is the same as the fourth. But as noted above, exactly the same is the case with the Cilician royal title in the so-called Hittite inscriptions, and we may venture therefore to read this latter as Sy(u)ennes.

DURING 19 CENTURY: HITTITES 781<br />

haps <strong>the</strong> earliest of <strong>the</strong> series, calls himself k<strong>in</strong>g, not of Cilicia,<br />

but of someth<strong>in</strong>g that perhaps has <strong>the</strong> same attribute as<br />

occurs <strong>in</strong> connection with <strong>the</strong> city of Karkemish <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Jerabis <strong>in</strong>scriptions.<br />

Unless, <strong>the</strong>refore, <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>gs of Cilicia,<br />

like those of Assyria, for <strong>in</strong>stance, bore some general title like<br />

" k<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> whole earth " or <strong>the</strong> like, we must suppose<br />

that Tarsus, <strong>the</strong> capital of Cilicia, is meant. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

<strong>the</strong> Assyrian and Aramaic writ<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> name at <strong>the</strong> time<br />

to which <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>scription belongs, about 600 b. c, <strong>the</strong> word<br />

must have been pronounced Tarz, or if <strong>the</strong> Biblical "Tiras "<br />

<strong>in</strong> Gen. 10 be identical with it, must have had <strong>the</strong> consonants<br />

Trds. This, accord<strong>in</strong>gly, will be <strong>the</strong> form of <strong>the</strong><br />

name <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>scription.<br />

There is one title which amongst all <strong>the</strong> Hittite sovereigns<br />

is peculiar to those of Cilicia. In <strong>the</strong> word-group which<br />

stands for it, <strong>the</strong> first symbol and <strong>the</strong> fourth are alike. From<br />

<strong>the</strong> frequency with which it<br />

occurs this symbol must have a<br />

simple phonetic value. As it is not one of <strong>the</strong> vowel signs,<br />

it must denote a simple consonant. At least three Cilician<br />

k<strong>in</strong>gs are called Syennesis <strong>in</strong> Greek. Only one, <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r<br />

of one Syennesis, has a different name, Oromedon. From<br />

this observation it<br />

has been surmised for a considerable time<br />

that Syennesis is properly a title. The fact that <strong>in</strong> Herodotus<br />

<strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r of one k<strong>in</strong>g is called by a different name<br />

need cause no difficulty, for Syennesis may well have been<br />

<strong>the</strong> designation only of <strong>the</strong> reign<strong>in</strong>g sovereign, who after<br />

death recovered his proper name, while his former title<br />

passed to his successor. This title Syennesis (borne by <strong>the</strong><br />

k<strong>in</strong>gs of Cilicia) with its four stem consonants : s, <strong>the</strong> spiritus<br />

lenis<br />

between y and e, which we and <strong>the</strong> Greek do not write,<br />

n and s, has <strong>the</strong> peculiarity that its first consonant is <strong>the</strong><br />

same as <strong>the</strong> fourth. But as noted above, exactly <strong>the</strong> same<br />

is <strong>the</strong> case with <strong>the</strong> Cilician royal title <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> so-called<br />

Hittite <strong>in</strong>scriptions, and we may venture <strong>the</strong>refore to read<br />

this latter as Sy(u)ennes.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!