31.03.2015 Views

Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht

Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht

Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DURING VJTH CENTURY: H1TTITES 777<br />

This fact alone excludes <strong>the</strong> possibility of a connection<br />

with <strong>the</strong> so-called Turanian languages on <strong>the</strong> one side and<br />

<strong>the</strong> Semitic tongues on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

It is now to be noted that <strong>the</strong> word for " I<br />

" conta<strong>in</strong>s a<br />

consonant of <strong>the</strong> same class as one word for " this," and <strong>the</strong><br />

end<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> genitive plural<br />

as <strong>the</strong> word for "am."<br />

a consonant of <strong>the</strong> same class<br />

Besides, a word for "great," or <strong>the</strong><br />

like, has <strong>the</strong> latter as its first consonant and <strong>the</strong> former as<br />

its second. The last named, aga<strong>in</strong>, is <strong>the</strong> first consonant <strong>in</strong><br />

two different words for " son " or "child;" while, as appears<br />

from <strong>the</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g of it, a word for " k<strong>in</strong>g " could be<br />

regarded as a compound beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>the</strong> word for " man."<br />

It cannot escape <strong>the</strong> Indogermanic scholar that exactly<br />

<strong>the</strong> same is or must have been <strong>the</strong> case <strong>in</strong> Armenian. Thus,<br />

before I could read a word, I might have concluded from<br />

<strong>the</strong> mere way <strong>the</strong> words were written that <strong>the</strong> speech was<br />

Armenian. For <strong>in</strong> Armenian <strong>the</strong> word for " I<br />

" is es, but<br />

of eso (out of edzo, or <strong>the</strong> like), while a word for " this " is<br />

ais ; em, formerly emi> means " I am," while om was once<br />

<strong>the</strong> end<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> genitive plural ; mets out of medzi(s) or<br />

<strong>the</strong> like means "great;" ustr means " son " and zav-ak<br />

" descendant ; " ark 1 ay is " k<strong>in</strong>g," and ayr, formerly ar(o)> is<br />

" man." This could have <strong>in</strong>dicated a way of arriv<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong><br />

read<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>scriptions. I found ano<strong>the</strong>r which led to<br />

<strong>the</strong> same astonish<strong>in</strong>g result.<br />

If <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>scriptions from Syria and <strong>the</strong> districts to <strong>the</strong><br />

north belong, as we have shown at<br />

length, to <strong>the</strong> period between<br />

say iooo and 600 b. c, <strong>the</strong>n those from Hama <strong>in</strong><br />

Syria have come down from k<strong>in</strong>gs of Hama; those from<br />

Jerabis on <strong>the</strong> Euphrates, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> territory of <strong>the</strong> ancient<br />

Karkemish, from k<strong>in</strong>gs of Karkemish ; those from Mar'ash<br />

north of Syria from k<strong>in</strong>gs of Gurgum, whose capital was Markash,<br />

<strong>the</strong> modern Mar'ash.<br />

In o<strong>the</strong>r words, <strong>the</strong>se different <strong>in</strong>scriptions<br />

go back to pr<strong>in</strong>ces of various petty states, not<br />

<strong>the</strong> lord of a s<strong>in</strong>gle great empire called<br />

to<br />

Khate embrac<strong>in</strong>g all

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!