Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht
Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht
776 EXPLORATIONS IN BIBLE LANDS only one in order. What else should the figure mean ? Other considerations must lead us to suppose that a word following this figure, or else its phonetic transliteration, must stand for " am." After this we must expect to find names and titles of the king. Since even in the greater inscriptions such titles, etc., are also found in the middle and even at the end, always appearing in the same form, /. e., in the same case, we cannot help concluding that at least the bulk of the inscriptions beginning with " I am " contain only titles, attributes, and so on ; including above all, of course, the title "king of." This circumstance assists us very materially in understanding the inscriptions correctly, for it appreciably reduces the number of possible meanings. By comparing the inscriptions with one another we can now establish the ideographic or phonetic equivalents, or perhaps both, for "king" and various synonyms of the same ; for " son " or " child " with one synonym ; for " country " and the names of countries ; for adjectives like " great " and " mighty " or their likes ; the pronoun " this " ; for the names of gods, which being regarded as sacred are very frequently isolated for by placing before and after (that is, above and below) them the symbol which denotes the beginning of a new word ; for words expressing the relations between men, mostly the king and the gods, as perhaps " servant," etc. ; for names of kings ; for a king's title occurring only in certain inscriptions found within a narrow radius. Thus, without being able to read a single symbol, I was in a position to explain a not inconsiderable portion of the inscriptions. Furthermore, I could make out various points which went far to determine the character of the Hittite speech. Thus the substantives have flectional endings, those for the nominative and genitive singular containing only vowels, that for the genitive plural a consonant. As for the syntax, it was plain that the genitive could follow or precede the word that governs it.
- Page 859 and 860: , DURING 19 T " CENTURY: ARABIA 7 3
- Page 861 and 862: DURING 19TU CENTURY: ARABIA 735 fac
- Page 863 and 864: DURING 19 CENTURY: ARABIA 737 with
- Page 865 and 866: — _«*wicii«~C VI. V>ldlli 203 W
- Page 867 and 868: DURING Win CENTURY: ARABIA 739 Nitu
- Page 869 and 870: DURING lorn CENTURY: ARABIA 741 (=
- Page 873 and 874: DURING 19 CENTURY: ARABIA 743 yond
- Page 875 and 876: — DURING ID'" CENTURY: ARABIA 745
- Page 877 and 878: this DURING l'JTH CENTURY: ARABIA 7
- Page 879 and 880: DURING 19 CENTURY: ARABIA 749 ancie
- Page 881 and 882: DURING 19Tit CENTURY: ARABIA 751 An
- Page 883 and 884: THE SO-CALLED HITTITES AND THEIR IN
- Page 885 and 886: THE SO-CALLED HITTITES INSCRIPTIONS
- Page 887 and 888: DURING 19 CENTURY: IIITTITES 757 sc
- Page 889: The Hittite God of the Sky (Ste/e i
- Page 892 and 893: 760 EXPLORATIONS IN BIBLE LANDS by
- Page 894 and 895: 762 EXPLORATIONS IN BIBLE LANDS of
- Page 897 and 898: DURING 19 CENTURY: IIITTITES 763 Wi
- Page 899 and 900: DURING 19 CENTURY: HITTITES 765 the
- Page 901 and 902: DURING 191H CENTURY: HITTITES 7G7 t
- Page 903 and 904: DURING 19 CENTURY : HITTITES 7G9 co
- Page 905 and 906: DURING 19TB CENTURY: HITTITES 771 s
- Page 907 and 908: DURING 19 CENTURY: HITTITES 773 mad
- Page 909: DURING 10 CENTURY : HITT1TES 115 ea
- Page 914: 778 EXPLORATIONS IN BIBLE LANDS the
- Page 917 and 918: DURING 19 CENTURY: HITTITES 779 mis
- Page 919 and 920: DURING 19 CENTURY: HITTITES 781 hap
- Page 921 and 922: DURING I!)"' CENTURY: HITTITES 783
- Page 923 and 924: DURING 19th CENTURY: H1TTITES 785 d
- Page 925 and 926: DURING Win CENTURY: HITTITES 787 na
- Page 927 and 928: DURING lorn CENTURY: HITTITES 789 f
- Page 929 and 930: DURING lQTii CENTURY: HITTITES 791
- Page 931: DURING 19'" CENTURY: IIITTITES 793
- Page 934 and 935: 79G _ ethnology of, 734-736 how ; i
- Page 936 and 937: 798 GENERAL INDEX. Constantinople,
- Page 938 and 939: 800 GENERAL INDEX. Gubi, trees of,
- Page 940 and 941: 802 GENERAL INDEX. Kom Ga'if, mound
- Page 942 and 943: . 804 GEN Eli A L INDEX. Oal'at Nun
- Page 944 and 945: 80G GENERAL INDEX. Rosellini's expe
- Page 946 and 947: . 808 GENERAL INDEX. Tiberius, coin
- Page 948: INDEX TO SCRIPTURE QUOTATIONS. Gene
- Page 953 and 954: a 1 ifs 00194
- Page 955: ill 3 11*8 00194 ITY
- Page 959: 3 1158 00194 9 I oso« ITY III 3 9Q
776 EXPLORATIONS IN BIBLE LANDS<br />
only one <strong>in</strong> order. What else should <strong>the</strong> figure mean ?<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r considerations must lead us to suppose that a word<br />
follow<strong>in</strong>g this figure, or else its phonetic transliteration,<br />
must stand for " am." After this we must expect to f<strong>in</strong>d<br />
names and titles of <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>g. S<strong>in</strong>ce even <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> greater <strong>in</strong>scriptions<br />
such titles, etc., are also found <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> middle and<br />
even at <strong>the</strong> end, always appear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same form, /.<br />
e., <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> same case, we cannot help conclud<strong>in</strong>g that at least <strong>the</strong><br />
bulk of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>scriptions beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g with " I am " conta<strong>in</strong><br />
only titles, attributes, and so on ; <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g above all, of<br />
course, <strong>the</strong> title "k<strong>in</strong>g of."<br />
This circumstance assists us very materially <strong>in</strong> understand<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>scriptions correctly, for it appreciably reduces <strong>the</strong><br />
number of possible mean<strong>in</strong>gs. By compar<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>scriptions<br />
with one ano<strong>the</strong>r we can now establish <strong>the</strong> ideographic<br />
or phonetic equivalents, or perhaps both, for "k<strong>in</strong>g" and<br />
various synonyms of <strong>the</strong> same ;<br />
for " son " or " child " with<br />
one synonym ; for " country " and <strong>the</strong> names of countries ;<br />
for adjectives like " great " and " mighty " or <strong>the</strong>ir likes ;<br />
<strong>the</strong> pronoun " this "<br />
; for <strong>the</strong> names of gods, which be<strong>in</strong>g regarded<br />
as sacred are very frequently isolated<br />
for<br />
by plac<strong>in</strong>g before<br />
and after (that is, above and below) <strong>the</strong>m <strong>the</strong> symbol<br />
which denotes <strong>the</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of a new word ; for words<br />
express<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> relations between men, mostly <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
<strong>the</strong> gods, as perhaps " servant," etc. ;<br />
for names of k<strong>in</strong>gs ;<br />
for a k<strong>in</strong>g's title occurr<strong>in</strong>g only <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>scriptions found<br />
with<strong>in</strong> a narrow radius. Thus, without be<strong>in</strong>g able to read<br />
a s<strong>in</strong>gle symbol, I was <strong>in</strong> a position to expla<strong>in</strong> a not <strong>in</strong>considerable<br />
portion of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>scriptions. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, I<br />
could make out various po<strong>in</strong>ts which went far to determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />
<strong>the</strong> character of <strong>the</strong> Hittite speech. Thus <strong>the</strong> substantives<br />
have flectional end<strong>in</strong>gs, those for <strong>the</strong> nom<strong>in</strong>ative and genitive<br />
s<strong>in</strong>gular conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g only vowels, that for <strong>the</strong> genitive<br />
plural a consonant. As for <strong>the</strong> syntax, it was pla<strong>in</strong> that <strong>the</strong><br />
genitive could follow or precede <strong>the</strong> word that governs it.