Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht

Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht

searchformecca.com
from searchformecca.com More from this publisher
31.03.2015 Views

776 EXPLORATIONS IN BIBLE LANDS only one in order. What else should the figure mean ? Other considerations must lead us to suppose that a word following this figure, or else its phonetic transliteration, must stand for " am." After this we must expect to find names and titles of the king. Since even in the greater inscriptions such titles, etc., are also found in the middle and even at the end, always appearing in the same form, /. e., in the same case, we cannot help concluding that at least the bulk of the inscriptions beginning with " I am " contain only titles, attributes, and so on ; including above all, of course, the title "king of." This circumstance assists us very materially in understanding the inscriptions correctly, for it appreciably reduces the number of possible meanings. By comparing the inscriptions with one another we can now establish the ideographic or phonetic equivalents, or perhaps both, for "king" and various synonyms of the same ; for " son " or " child " with one synonym ; for " country " and the names of countries ; for adjectives like " great " and " mighty " or their likes ; the pronoun " this " ; for the names of gods, which being regarded as sacred are very frequently isolated for by placing before and after (that is, above and below) them the symbol which denotes the beginning of a new word ; for words expressing the relations between men, mostly the king and the gods, as perhaps " servant," etc. ; for names of kings ; for a king's title occurring only in certain inscriptions found within a narrow radius. Thus, without being able to read a single symbol, I was in a position to explain a not inconsiderable portion of the inscriptions. Furthermore, I could make out various points which went far to determine the character of the Hittite speech. Thus the substantives have flectional endings, those for the nominative and genitive singular containing only vowels, that for the genitive plural a consonant. As for the syntax, it was plain that the genitive could follow or precede the word that governs it.

776 EXPLORATIONS IN BIBLE LANDS<br />

only one <strong>in</strong> order. What else should <strong>the</strong> figure mean ?<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r considerations must lead us to suppose that a word<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g this figure, or else its phonetic transliteration,<br />

must stand for " am." After this we must expect to f<strong>in</strong>d<br />

names and titles of <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>g. S<strong>in</strong>ce even <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> greater <strong>in</strong>scriptions<br />

such titles, etc., are also found <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> middle and<br />

even at <strong>the</strong> end, always appear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same form, /.<br />

e., <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> same case, we cannot help conclud<strong>in</strong>g that at least <strong>the</strong><br />

bulk of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>scriptions beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g with " I am " conta<strong>in</strong><br />

only titles, attributes, and so on ; <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g above all, of<br />

course, <strong>the</strong> title "k<strong>in</strong>g of."<br />

This circumstance assists us very materially <strong>in</strong> understand<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>scriptions correctly, for it appreciably reduces <strong>the</strong><br />

number of possible mean<strong>in</strong>gs. By compar<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>scriptions<br />

with one ano<strong>the</strong>r we can now establish <strong>the</strong> ideographic<br />

or phonetic equivalents, or perhaps both, for "k<strong>in</strong>g" and<br />

various synonyms of <strong>the</strong> same ;<br />

for " son " or " child " with<br />

one synonym ; for " country " and <strong>the</strong> names of countries ;<br />

for adjectives like " great " and " mighty " or <strong>the</strong>ir likes ;<br />

<strong>the</strong> pronoun " this "<br />

; for <strong>the</strong> names of gods, which be<strong>in</strong>g regarded<br />

as sacred are very frequently isolated<br />

for<br />

by plac<strong>in</strong>g before<br />

and after (that is, above and below) <strong>the</strong>m <strong>the</strong> symbol<br />

which denotes <strong>the</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of a new word ; for words<br />

express<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> relations between men, mostly <strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

<strong>the</strong> gods, as perhaps " servant," etc. ;<br />

for names of k<strong>in</strong>gs ;<br />

for a k<strong>in</strong>g's title occurr<strong>in</strong>g only <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>scriptions found<br />

with<strong>in</strong> a narrow radius. Thus, without be<strong>in</strong>g able to read<br />

a s<strong>in</strong>gle symbol, I was <strong>in</strong> a position to expla<strong>in</strong> a not <strong>in</strong>considerable<br />

portion of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>scriptions. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, I<br />

could make out various po<strong>in</strong>ts which went far to determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />

<strong>the</strong> character of <strong>the</strong> Hittite speech. Thus <strong>the</strong> substantives<br />

have flectional end<strong>in</strong>gs, those for <strong>the</strong> nom<strong>in</strong>ative and genitive<br />

s<strong>in</strong>gular conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g only vowels, that for <strong>the</strong> genitive<br />

plural a consonant. As for <strong>the</strong> syntax, it was pla<strong>in</strong> that <strong>the</strong><br />

genitive could follow or precede <strong>the</strong> word that governs it.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!