Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht

Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht

searchformecca.com
from searchformecca.com More from this publisher
31.03.2015 Views

774 EXPLORATIONS IN BIBLE LANDS The ideographs prove to be very numerous. As we learn from our determining the contents of the inscriptions, we have ideographs for the names of countries, persons and gods, for titles and dignities such as king and lord, for adjectives, and so on. The numerous ideographs used for the names of gods who play an important part in the inscriptions deserve special mention. A very remarkable feature still awaiting a satisfactory explanation is the fact that perhaps all the gods mentioned in the inscriptions may be represented by a hand placed in different positions. Thus the " Father of the Gods " has a flat hand as his original hand-hieroglyph, which however was simplified later, while the " Mother of the Gods " has a fist as her handhieroglyph. Some of the ideographs, apparently, may be added or left out at pleasure. Such are the symbols for " god," " man," " country," found before the names of gods, the names and attributes of kings, the names of towns and countries respectively. In such cases the symbols are to be considered as determinatives, specifying the category of the word which follows. The symbols with two main classes, those which are phonetic values may be divided into but rarely met with, and those which are found everywhere in the most various wordgroups. It is at once apparent that the phonetic values of the latter must be as simple as possible, representing only a single sound, or at the most a consonant and a vowel, while the majority of the former represent combinations of more than two sounds, perhaps a consonant and a vowel and a consonant, or, neglecting the vowels in between, a series of say two consonants. The symbols ocurring frequently are remarkably small in number, and in at least four different instances two of them have been interchanged. As they are not vowel-signs, it follows that the sounds they stand for must have one con-

DURING 10 CENTURY : HITT1TES 115 each case can sonant in common, while only one of them in There are scarcely more than stand for a simple consonant. perhaps eight signs for simple consonants. Hence it would appear that in the Hittite tongue there were only eight consonants. This, however, seems incredible. We are therefore compelled to assume that as in the Cypriotic syllabary a single sign could represent several consonants, all belonging to the same category, of course, as e. g. k and g, d and t. Our phonetic decipherment will furnish the proof of this assertion. Moreover, we find at most three vowel-signs, one for a and o (and u ?)> another for e and /, whereas it is evident from the Assyrian and Greek versions of proper names belonging to the Hittite area, e. g., Melidd-u, Syennesis, Kommag-ene, that the Hittites had more than three vowels to dispose of. Such transliterations therefore prove that they were as saving with their vowels as with their consonants. The above will serve to show in a measure how it was possible for me to make out the system of the writing without being able to read it in the proper sense. The contents of the inscriptions, however, could in part be made out even without this. A few hints may now be given to illustrate it. Inscriptions which we are forced to assume to some king or other belong to dignitary frequently begin with a figure consisting of a head with an arm attached, the hand pointing (not to the mouth but) to the region between mouth and nose. If we suppose the hand to point to the mouth, a reference to an analogous instance in the Egyptian writing must at once suggest the meaning " to say " or " to speak " for this figure, as was assumed by Sayce at a later stage of his decipherings : " thus speaks such and such a king." But if this supposition be ruled out, then according to all analogy, the meaning " I " favored by Halevy and others, and at an earlier stage by Sayce as well, seems about the

774 EXPLORATIONS IN BIBLE LANDS<br />

The ideographs prove to be very numerous. As we<br />

learn from our determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> contents of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>scriptions,<br />

we have ideographs for <strong>the</strong> names of countries, persons and<br />

gods, for titles and dignities such as k<strong>in</strong>g and lord, for adjectives,<br />

and so on. The numerous ideographs used for<br />

<strong>the</strong> names of gods who play an important part <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>scriptions<br />

deserve special mention. A very remarkable feature<br />

still await<strong>in</strong>g a satisfactory explanation is <strong>the</strong> fact that<br />

perhaps all <strong>the</strong> gods mentioned <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>scriptions may be<br />

represented by a hand placed <strong>in</strong> different positions. Thus<br />

<strong>the</strong> " Fa<strong>the</strong>r of <strong>the</strong> Gods " has a flat hand as his orig<strong>in</strong>al<br />

hand-hieroglyph, which however was simplified later, while<br />

<strong>the</strong> " Mo<strong>the</strong>r of <strong>the</strong> Gods " has a fist as her handhieroglyph.<br />

Some of <strong>the</strong> ideographs, apparently, may be added or left<br />

out at pleasure. Such are <strong>the</strong> symbols for " god," " man,"<br />

" country," found before <strong>the</strong> names of gods, <strong>the</strong> names and<br />

attributes of k<strong>in</strong>gs, <strong>the</strong> names of towns and countries respectively.<br />

In such cases <strong>the</strong> symbols are to be considered<br />

as determ<strong>in</strong>atives, specify<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> category of <strong>the</strong> word which<br />

follows.<br />

The symbols with<br />

two ma<strong>in</strong> classes, those which are<br />

phonetic values may be divided <strong>in</strong>to<br />

but rarely met with, and<br />

those which are found everywhere <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> most various wordgroups.<br />

It is at once apparent that <strong>the</strong> phonetic values<br />

of <strong>the</strong> latter must be as simple as possible, represent<strong>in</strong>g<br />

only a s<strong>in</strong>gle sound, or at <strong>the</strong> most a consonant and a<br />

vowel, while <strong>the</strong> majority of <strong>the</strong> former represent comb<strong>in</strong>ations<br />

of more than two sounds, perhaps a consonant and<br />

a vowel and a consonant, or, neglect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> vowels <strong>in</strong> between,<br />

a series of say two consonants.<br />

The symbols ocurr<strong>in</strong>g frequently are remarkably small <strong>in</strong><br />

number, and <strong>in</strong> at least four different <strong>in</strong>stances two of <strong>the</strong>m<br />

have been <strong>in</strong>terchanged. As <strong>the</strong>y are not vowel-signs, it<br />

follows that <strong>the</strong> sounds <strong>the</strong>y stand for must have one con-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!