31.03.2015 Views

Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht

Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht

Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

772 EXPLORATIONS IN BIBLE LANDS<br />

tions equally well, and s<strong>in</strong>ce, moreover, his fur<strong>the</strong>r results<br />

rest upon a series of similar postulates, it is clear how exceed<strong>in</strong>gly<br />

vague <strong>the</strong>se " results " must be. Besides, he is<br />

directly wrong <strong>in</strong> his arrangement <strong>in</strong> connection with one<br />

of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>scriptions as <strong>in</strong> various of his o<strong>the</strong>r suppositions,<br />

a circumstance which makes it still more evident that all his<br />

conclusions with respect to <strong>the</strong> phonetic decipher<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>scriptions are equally false. However, his efforts too have<br />

not been quite without result ; his recognition of one symbol<br />

as a punctuation mark is approximately correct. Anyth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

he may have done for <strong>the</strong> correct or approximately<br />

correct determ<strong>in</strong>ation of <strong>the</strong> sound values he owes to<br />

chance ; to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpretation of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>scriptions he has not<br />

contributed an iota. So much for <strong>the</strong> labors of my predecessors<br />

and <strong>the</strong>ir results.<br />

They have all failed sufficiently to remember that <strong>the</strong><br />

decipherer has two tasks before him, — one be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

of <strong>the</strong> contents, and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> read<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong><br />

words — and that <strong>the</strong>se two sections of <strong>the</strong> work, while often<br />

runn<strong>in</strong>g parallel and frequently overlapp<strong>in</strong>g, still<br />

cannot be<br />

too strictly kept separate. We may be able to read an <strong>in</strong>scription<br />

without understand<strong>in</strong>g it, and to tell <strong>the</strong> contents<br />

of ano<strong>the</strong>r without be<strong>in</strong>g able to read it. Throughout my<br />

decipher<strong>in</strong>gs, which I now proceed to describe, I have endeavored<br />

as far as possible to keep <strong>the</strong> two problems apart.<br />

At <strong>the</strong> first sight one perceives that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>scriptions are<br />

written <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> so-called boustrophedon manner, which<br />

Hayes Ward was <strong>the</strong> first to see as early as 1873. In <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>scriptions <strong>the</strong>re are no empty spaces separat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> different<br />

word-groups from one ano<strong>the</strong>r. Hence <strong>the</strong> first<br />

step was by compar<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>scriptions to del<strong>in</strong>eate (i. e. y<br />

to<br />

separate from each o<strong>the</strong>r) <strong>the</strong> various word-groups. In<br />

course of this process it<br />

became evident that different signs,<br />

an upright knife — Peiser's " S<strong>in</strong>trenner " — and a similar<br />

sign served to keep <strong>the</strong> word-groups apart. These aga<strong>in</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!