31.03.2015 Views

Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht

Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht

Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

770 EXPLORATIONS IN BIBLE LANDS<br />

<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> end desired, 1 but it miscarried and had to miscarry.<br />

For <strong>the</strong> very peculiar character of <strong>the</strong> bil<strong>in</strong>gual <strong>in</strong>scription<br />

made it impossible to reach a sure result by its<br />

aid. For, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first place, <strong>the</strong> Assyrio-Babylonian version<br />

was to all appearances <strong>the</strong> work of an unskilful engraver,<br />

and many po<strong>in</strong>ts of read<strong>in</strong>g, even <strong>the</strong> very name of<br />

<strong>the</strong> k<strong>in</strong>g, were confessedly doubtful, while <strong>the</strong><br />

arrangement<br />

of <strong>the</strong> hieroglyphic version was by no means self-evident<br />

or certa<strong>in</strong>. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, of <strong>the</strong> six symbols which occur<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> hieroglyphic version, onlv three, or at most four,<br />

have with certa<strong>in</strong>ty (<strong>in</strong> spite of Sayce's supposition to <strong>the</strong><br />

contrary) been found <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>scriptions of this character.<br />

Without a doubt, <strong>in</strong> his read<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> Assyrio-Babylonian<br />

version Sayce <strong>in</strong> some po<strong>in</strong>ts was more probably wrong<br />

than right. He arranged <strong>the</strong> hieroglyphic version wrongly,<br />

and he found all six symbols <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>scriptions ; some of<br />

<strong>the</strong>m he recognized <strong>in</strong> characters which he regarded as mere<br />

variants, but which <strong>in</strong> reality were absolutely dist<strong>in</strong>ct forms.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, as <strong>the</strong> bil<strong>in</strong>gual was essentially <strong>the</strong> foundation<br />

on which he built, it follows that his fur<strong>the</strong>r " decipher<strong>in</strong>gs "<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> can have but little claim to this title. It should<br />

be noted, however, that his efforts<br />

have not been altoge<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>in</strong> va<strong>in</strong>. Thus with <strong>the</strong> help of <strong>the</strong> bil<strong>in</strong>gual he has by<br />

chance made out correctly, but not proved, <strong>the</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

a sign for me and mi, also of a sign for "k<strong>in</strong>g" or its equivalent.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r, a symbol which accord<strong>in</strong>g to my read<strong>in</strong>g<br />

stands for dei, " lord," he has by chance translated approximately<br />

correctly as "k<strong>in</strong>g." Two o<strong>the</strong>r signs he takes,<br />

not without good reasons, to serve as<br />

case-end<strong>in</strong>gs, and ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

sign from <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>scriptions which accompany <strong>the</strong> figures<br />

of gods at<br />

Boghazkoi he takes to be <strong>the</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>ative<br />

for " god," all of which are correct or at least<br />

approximately<br />

1<br />

In <strong>the</strong> "Transactions of <strong>the</strong> Society of Biblical Archeology," vol. vii.,<br />

pp. 274, seqq., and 299, seqq., also <strong>in</strong> Wright, " The Empire of <strong>the</strong> Hittites,"<br />

2ded., pp. 166, seqq., etc.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!