Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht
Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht
766 EXPLORATIONS IN BIBLE LANDS inscriptions with engraved characters, it will apply to these too and others like them. These inscriptions, therefore, written in the engraved character may be safely referred to Sargon's time or later (perhaps even later than 606 b. c.) — a conclusion at which we had already arrived for another reason discussed above. Finally, certain Hittite seal inscriptions found in the ruins of Nineveh cannot be of later origin than 606 b. c, because in this year Nineveh was destroyed. From arguments of this nature it is plain that at all events the great mass of the inscriptions belongs to a period between 1000 and 600 b. c, allowing perhaps a little on either side. The approximate chronologv thus arrived at for the series tallies well enough with that reached by the other methods indicated above, also with that fixed by Puchstein for the accompanving sculptures. Our results mav therefore be held to be approximately correct. These results will make, e.g., the Hamath inscriptions, the character of which is of an earlier type than that of any inscription from Jerabis, date from about 1000 b. c, or earlier, while according to them the inscription on the bowl from Babvlon will date from about 600 b. c. An analysis of the inscriptions corroborates this view. Thus, an inscription from Ordasu (accompanying a lion hunt), where the characters exhibit a relativelv late form but still are cut out in relief, must date from between 712-708 b. c, because it belongs to Mud(t)allu of Kommagene, who according to the cuneiform inscriptions during this period held Melitene. On the other side two inscriptions in engraved characters, including that on the bowl, seem to have been composed after 606 b. c. or not much earlier, because according to their contents Karkemish is apparentlv held no longer by an Assvrian king but bv a king of Cilicia. At this point the further question mav be put, how old this hieroglyphic system of ours reallv is. We mav point
DURING 191H CENTURY: HITTITES 7G7 to the fact that even in the inscriptions from Hama (Hamath), which, apart perhaps from that carved on the rock of the Pseudo-Sesostris, are undoubtedly the oldest of the series, we find no longer a pure picture-writing, but one Hittite Inscription on a Bowl from Babylon already modified by the influence of the cursive. It follows from this that the system is of earlier date than the Hamath inscriptions, that is, earlier than about iooo b. c. It is to be noted on the other hand that about 1400 the Assyrio-Babvlonian cuneiform writing then in use in Western Asia was also employed in the royal despatches sent to the king of Egypt by the various princes ruling in the
- Page 849 and 850: DURING 19 Til CENTURY: ARABIA 723 a
- Page 851 and 852: DURING Wit CENTURY: ARABIA 725 Both
- Page 853 and 854: DURING 19 CENTURY: ARABIA 727 II Th
- Page 855 and 856: DURING 19 CENTURY: ARABIA 729 1893)
- Page 857 and 858: DURING 19TB CENTURY: ARABIA 731 est
- Page 859 and 860: , DURING 19 T " CENTURY: ARABIA 7 3
- Page 861 and 862: DURING 19TU CENTURY: ARABIA 735 fac
- Page 863 and 864: DURING 19 CENTURY: ARABIA 737 with
- Page 865 and 866: — _«*wicii«~C VI. V>ldlli 203 W
- Page 867 and 868: DURING Win CENTURY: ARABIA 739 Nitu
- Page 869 and 870: DURING lorn CENTURY: ARABIA 741 (=
- Page 873 and 874: DURING 19 CENTURY: ARABIA 743 yond
- Page 875 and 876: — DURING ID'" CENTURY: ARABIA 745
- Page 877 and 878: this DURING l'JTH CENTURY: ARABIA 7
- Page 879 and 880: DURING 19 CENTURY: ARABIA 749 ancie
- Page 881 and 882: DURING 19Tit CENTURY: ARABIA 751 An
- Page 883 and 884: THE SO-CALLED HITTITES AND THEIR IN
- Page 885 and 886: THE SO-CALLED HITTITES INSCRIPTIONS
- Page 887 and 888: DURING 19 CENTURY: IIITTITES 757 sc
- Page 889: The Hittite God of the Sky (Ste/e i
- Page 892 and 893: 760 EXPLORATIONS IN BIBLE LANDS by
- Page 894 and 895: 762 EXPLORATIONS IN BIBLE LANDS of
- Page 897 and 898: DURING 19 CENTURY: IIITTITES 763 Wi
- Page 899: DURING 19 CENTURY: HITTITES 765 the
- Page 903 and 904: DURING 19 CENTURY : HITTITES 7G9 co
- Page 905 and 906: DURING 19TB CENTURY: HITTITES 771 s
- Page 907 and 908: DURING 19 CENTURY: HITTITES 773 mad
- Page 909 and 910: DURING 10 CENTURY : HITT1TES 115 ea
- Page 913 and 914: DURING VJTH CENTURY: H1TTITES 777 T
- Page 916 and 917: .5 sj =2 .5
- Page 918 and 919: 780 EXPLORATIONS IN BIBLE LANDS Acc
- Page 920 and 921: ; 782 EXPLORATIONS IN BIBLE LANDS A
- Page 922 and 923: 784 EXPLORATIONS IN BIBLE LANDS ext
- Page 924 and 925: 786 EXPLORATIONS IN BIBLE LANDS han
- Page 926 and 927: 788 EXPLORATIONS IN BIBLE LANDS peo
- Page 928 and 929: 790 EXPLORATIONS IN BIBLE LANDS san
- Page 930 and 931: 792 EXPLORATIONS IN BIBLE LANDS con
- Page 933 and 934: GENERAL INDEX, Abim-Kheba, loyalty
- Page 935 and 936: . GENERAL INDEX. 797 Bet Ris, ruins
- Page 937 and 938: . GENERAL INDEX. 799 El-Kib, Quibel
- Page 939 and 940: GENERAL INDEX. 801 Horus, sun-god o
- Page 941 and 942: GENERAL INDEX. 803 Mesha, king of M
- Page 943 and 944: GENERAL INDEX. 805 second campaign
- Page 945 and 946: GENERAL INDEX. 807 Sidon, discoveri
- Page 947 and 948: GENERAL INDEX. 809 Yahve, significa
766 EXPLORATIONS IN BIBLE LANDS<br />
<strong>in</strong>scriptions with engraved characters, it will apply to <strong>the</strong>se<br />
too and o<strong>the</strong>rs like <strong>the</strong>m. These <strong>in</strong>scriptions, <strong>the</strong>refore,<br />
written <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> engraved character may be safely referred to<br />
Sargon's time or later (perhaps even later than 606 b. c.) —<br />
a conclusion at which we had already arrived for ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />
reason discussed above. F<strong>in</strong>ally, certa<strong>in</strong> Hittite seal <strong>in</strong>scriptions<br />
found <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ru<strong>in</strong>s of N<strong>in</strong>eveh cannot be of later<br />
orig<strong>in</strong> than 606 b. c, because <strong>in</strong> this year N<strong>in</strong>eveh was<br />
destroyed.<br />
From arguments of this nature it is pla<strong>in</strong> that at all<br />
events <strong>the</strong> great mass of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>scriptions belongs to a period<br />
between 1000 and 600 b. c, allow<strong>in</strong>g perhaps a little on<br />
ei<strong>the</strong>r side. The approximate chronologv thus arrived at<br />
for <strong>the</strong> series tallies well enough with that reached by <strong>the</strong><br />
o<strong>the</strong>r methods <strong>in</strong>dicated above, also with that fixed by Puchste<strong>in</strong><br />
for <strong>the</strong> accompanv<strong>in</strong>g sculptures. Our results mav<br />
<strong>the</strong>refore be held to be approximately correct. These results<br />
will<br />
make, e.g., <strong>the</strong> Hamath <strong>in</strong>scriptions, <strong>the</strong> character<br />
of which is of an earlier type than that of any <strong>in</strong>scription<br />
from Jerabis, date from about 1000 b. c, or earlier, while<br />
accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong>m <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>scription on <strong>the</strong> bowl from Babvlon<br />
will date from about 600 b. c. An analysis of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>scriptions<br />
corroborates this view.<br />
Thus, an <strong>in</strong>scription from<br />
Ordasu (accompany<strong>in</strong>g a lion hunt), where <strong>the</strong> characters<br />
exhibit a relativelv late form but still are cut out <strong>in</strong> relief,<br />
must date from between 712-708 b. c, because it belongs<br />
to<br />
Mud(t)allu of Kommagene, who accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> cuneiform<br />
<strong>in</strong>scriptions dur<strong>in</strong>g this period held Melitene. On<br />
<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r side two <strong>in</strong>scriptions <strong>in</strong> engraved characters, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
that on <strong>the</strong> bowl, seem to have been composed after<br />
606 b. c. or not much earlier, because accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
contents Karkemish is apparentlv held no longer by an<br />
Assvrian k<strong>in</strong>g but bv a k<strong>in</strong>g of Cilicia.<br />
At this po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>the</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r question mav be put, how old<br />
this hieroglyphic system of ours reallv is. We mav po<strong>in</strong>t