Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht
Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht
DURING 19 CENTURY: HITTITES 759 tions by the name Hittite. at first sight to be inappropriate. But such a designation appears For the name Hittite, derived as it is from the name of a country, could properly speaking only be employed if it was sure that all the inscriptions were found in the so-called land of Khate, which they were not ; or that they were the product of a people belonging exclusively to Khate, something that could not be known. In the latter case they could tell us nothing at all as to the particular nationality of this people. But even supposing that the name Khittim (= Hittite), and its equivalents in the above mentioned inscriptions, applied to a single definite people (and no more) belonging to the country Khate, and that the Khate-folk of the Egyptians, Assyrians, and pre- Indogermanic Armenians were therefore all one stock, which is a mere hypothesis ; and supposing futhermore that these Hittites from Khate had at a certain time been settled in Asia Minor, or had even enjoyed a supremacy there — the proof that they, and they alone, were the authors of the hieroglyphic inscriptions in Syria and Asia Minor is still lacking unless we are able definitely to assign the inscriptions in question to their period. Therefore in order to arrive at a positive knowledge, we must first of all determine the time when the inscriptions were written. This fundamental work having been omitted by Sayce and Wright, their hypothesis lacked the necessary confirmation. The problem may be attacked from more than one side. It would be a great step in advance, if with some degree of certainty we could fix the relative chronology of the inscriptions, the relative order of their composition. It is a species of picture writing that we have to deal with, and in the inscriptions, though not in to a considerable extent, may still many of all, the constituent characters, be recognized as pictures. Thus in some instances we find an animal head with certain characteristic features ; in others, however, we find corresponding to it what is recognized to be an animal head only
- Page 840 and 841: 718 EXPLORATIONS IN BIBLE LANDS The
- Page 842: 720 EXPLORATIONS IN BIBLE LANDS gav
- Page 846 and 847: 722 EXPLORATIONS IN BIBLE LANDS inc
- Page 849 and 850: DURING 19 Til CENTURY: ARABIA 723 a
- Page 851 and 852: DURING Wit CENTURY: ARABIA 725 Both
- Page 853 and 854: DURING 19 CENTURY: ARABIA 727 II Th
- Page 855 and 856: DURING 19 CENTURY: ARABIA 729 1893)
- Page 857 and 858: DURING 19TB CENTURY: ARABIA 731 est
- Page 859 and 860: , DURING 19 T " CENTURY: ARABIA 7 3
- Page 861 and 862: DURING 19TU CENTURY: ARABIA 735 fac
- Page 863 and 864: DURING 19 CENTURY: ARABIA 737 with
- Page 865 and 866: — _«*wicii«~C VI. V>ldlli 203 W
- Page 867 and 868: DURING Win CENTURY: ARABIA 739 Nitu
- Page 869 and 870: DURING lorn CENTURY: ARABIA 741 (=
- Page 873 and 874: DURING 19 CENTURY: ARABIA 743 yond
- Page 875 and 876: — DURING ID'" CENTURY: ARABIA 745
- Page 877 and 878: this DURING l'JTH CENTURY: ARABIA 7
- Page 879 and 880: DURING 19 CENTURY: ARABIA 749 ancie
- Page 881 and 882: DURING 19Tit CENTURY: ARABIA 751 An
- Page 883 and 884: THE SO-CALLED HITTITES AND THEIR IN
- Page 885 and 886: THE SO-CALLED HITTITES INSCRIPTIONS
- Page 887 and 888: DURING 19 CENTURY: IIITTITES 757 sc
- Page 889: The Hittite God of the Sky (Ste/e i
- Page 893 and 894: DURING 10'" CENTURY : HITTITES 701
- Page 895: The Pseudo-Sesostris ( Cawed on the
- Page 898 and 899: 7G4 EXPLORATIONS IN BIBLE LANDS bot
- Page 900 and 901: 766 EXPLORATIONS IN BIBLE LANDS ins
- Page 902 and 903: 7G8 EXPLORATIONS IN BIBLE LANDS sou
- Page 904 and 905: 770 EXPLORATIONS IN BIBLE LANDS ing
- Page 906 and 907: 772 EXPLORATIONS IN BIBLE LANDS tio
- Page 908 and 909: 774 EXPLORATIONS IN BIBLE LANDS The
- Page 910: 776 EXPLORATIONS IN BIBLE LANDS onl
- Page 914: 778 EXPLORATIONS IN BIBLE LANDS the
- Page 917 and 918: DURING 19 CENTURY: HITTITES 779 mis
- Page 919 and 920: DURING 19 CENTURY: HITTITES 781 hap
- Page 921 and 922: DURING I!)"' CENTURY: HITTITES 783
- Page 923 and 924: DURING 19th CENTURY: H1TTITES 785 d
- Page 925 and 926: DURING Win CENTURY: HITTITES 787 na
- Page 927 and 928: DURING lorn CENTURY: HITTITES 789 f
- Page 929 and 930: DURING lQTii CENTURY: HITTITES 791
- Page 931: DURING 19'" CENTURY: IIITTITES 793
- Page 934 and 935: 79G _ ethnology of, 734-736 how ; i
- Page 936 and 937: 798 GENERAL INDEX. Constantinople,
- Page 938 and 939: 800 GENERAL INDEX. Gubi, trees of,
DURING 19 CENTURY: HITTITES 759<br />
tions by <strong>the</strong> name Hittite.<br />
at first sight to be <strong>in</strong>appropriate.<br />
But such a designation appears<br />
For <strong>the</strong> name Hittite, derived<br />
as it is from <strong>the</strong> name of a country, could properly<br />
speak<strong>in</strong>g only be employed if it was sure that all <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>scriptions<br />
were found <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> so-called land of Khate, which <strong>the</strong>y<br />
were not ; or that <strong>the</strong>y were <strong>the</strong> product of a people belong<strong>in</strong>g<br />
exclusively to Khate, someth<strong>in</strong>g that could not be known.<br />
In <strong>the</strong> latter case <strong>the</strong>y could tell us noth<strong>in</strong>g at all as to <strong>the</strong><br />
particular nationality of this people. But even suppos<strong>in</strong>g<br />
that <strong>the</strong> name Khittim (= Hittite), and its equivalents <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
above mentioned <strong>in</strong>scriptions, applied to a s<strong>in</strong>gle def<strong>in</strong>ite<br />
people (and no more) belong<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong><br />
country Khate, and<br />
that <strong>the</strong> Khate-folk of <strong>the</strong> Egyptians, Assyrians, and pre-<br />
Indogermanic Armenians were <strong>the</strong>refore all<br />
one stock, which<br />
is a mere hypo<strong>the</strong>sis ; and suppos<strong>in</strong>g fu<strong>the</strong>rmore that <strong>the</strong>se<br />
Hittites from Khate had at a certa<strong>in</strong> time been settled <strong>in</strong><br />
Asia M<strong>in</strong>or, or had even enjoyed a<br />
supremacy <strong>the</strong>re — <strong>the</strong><br />
proof that <strong>the</strong>y, and <strong>the</strong>y alone, were <strong>the</strong> authors of <strong>the</strong><br />
hieroglyphic <strong>in</strong>scriptions <strong>in</strong> Syria and Asia M<strong>in</strong>or is still<br />
lack<strong>in</strong>g unless we are able def<strong>in</strong>itely to assign <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>scriptions<br />
<strong>in</strong> question to <strong>the</strong>ir period. Therefore <strong>in</strong> order to<br />
arrive at a positive knowledge, we must first of all determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />
<strong>the</strong> time when <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>scriptions were written. This fundamental<br />
work hav<strong>in</strong>g been omitted by Sayce and Wright,<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir hypo<strong>the</strong>sis lacked <strong>the</strong> necessary confirmation.<br />
The problem may be attacked from more than one side.<br />
It would be a great step <strong>in</strong> advance, if with some degree of<br />
certa<strong>in</strong>ty we could fix<br />
<strong>the</strong> relative chronology of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>scriptions,<br />
<strong>the</strong> relative order of <strong>the</strong>ir composition. It is a species<br />
of picture writ<strong>in</strong>g that we have to deal with, and <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>scriptions, though not <strong>in</strong><br />
to a considerable extent, may still<br />
many of<br />
all, <strong>the</strong> constituent characters,<br />
be recognized as pictures.<br />
Thus <strong>in</strong> some <strong>in</strong>stances we f<strong>in</strong>d an animal head with certa<strong>in</strong><br />
characteristic features ; <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs, however, we f<strong>in</strong>d correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to it what is recognized to be an animal head only