Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht

Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht

searchformecca.com
from searchformecca.com More from this publisher
31.03.2015 Views

DURING 19 CENTURY: HITTITES 759 tions by the name Hittite. at first sight to be inappropriate. But such a designation appears For the name Hittite, derived as it is from the name of a country, could properly speaking only be employed if it was sure that all the inscriptions were found in the so-called land of Khate, which they were not ; or that they were the product of a people belonging exclusively to Khate, something that could not be known. In the latter case they could tell us nothing at all as to the particular nationality of this people. But even supposing that the name Khittim (= Hittite), and its equivalents in the above mentioned inscriptions, applied to a single definite people (and no more) belonging to the country Khate, and that the Khate-folk of the Egyptians, Assyrians, and pre- Indogermanic Armenians were therefore all one stock, which is a mere hypothesis ; and supposing futhermore that these Hittites from Khate had at a certain time been settled in Asia Minor, or had even enjoyed a supremacy there — the proof that they, and they alone, were the authors of the hieroglyphic inscriptions in Syria and Asia Minor is still lacking unless we are able definitely to assign the inscriptions in question to their period. Therefore in order to arrive at a positive knowledge, we must first of all determine the time when the inscriptions were written. This fundamental work having been omitted by Sayce and Wright, their hypothesis lacked the necessary confirmation. The problem may be attacked from more than one side. It would be a great step in advance, if with some degree of certainty we could fix the relative chronology of the inscriptions, the relative order of their composition. It is a species of picture writing that we have to deal with, and in the inscriptions, though not in to a considerable extent, may still many of all, the constituent characters, be recognized as pictures. Thus in some instances we find an animal head with certain characteristic features ; in others, however, we find corresponding to it what is recognized to be an animal head only

DURING 19 CENTURY: HITTITES 759<br />

tions by <strong>the</strong> name Hittite.<br />

at first sight to be <strong>in</strong>appropriate.<br />

But such a designation appears<br />

For <strong>the</strong> name Hittite, derived<br />

as it is from <strong>the</strong> name of a country, could properly<br />

speak<strong>in</strong>g only be employed if it was sure that all <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>scriptions<br />

were found <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> so-called land of Khate, which <strong>the</strong>y<br />

were not ; or that <strong>the</strong>y were <strong>the</strong> product of a people belong<strong>in</strong>g<br />

exclusively to Khate, someth<strong>in</strong>g that could not be known.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> latter case <strong>the</strong>y could tell us noth<strong>in</strong>g at all as to <strong>the</strong><br />

particular nationality of this people. But even suppos<strong>in</strong>g<br />

that <strong>the</strong> name Khittim (= Hittite), and its equivalents <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

above mentioned <strong>in</strong>scriptions, applied to a s<strong>in</strong>gle def<strong>in</strong>ite<br />

people (and no more) belong<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong><br />

country Khate, and<br />

that <strong>the</strong> Khate-folk of <strong>the</strong> Egyptians, Assyrians, and pre-<br />

Indogermanic Armenians were <strong>the</strong>refore all<br />

one stock, which<br />

is a mere hypo<strong>the</strong>sis ; and suppos<strong>in</strong>g fu<strong>the</strong>rmore that <strong>the</strong>se<br />

Hittites from Khate had at a certa<strong>in</strong> time been settled <strong>in</strong><br />

Asia M<strong>in</strong>or, or had even enjoyed a<br />

supremacy <strong>the</strong>re — <strong>the</strong><br />

proof that <strong>the</strong>y, and <strong>the</strong>y alone, were <strong>the</strong> authors of <strong>the</strong><br />

hieroglyphic <strong>in</strong>scriptions <strong>in</strong> Syria and Asia M<strong>in</strong>or is still<br />

lack<strong>in</strong>g unless we are able def<strong>in</strong>itely to assign <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>scriptions<br />

<strong>in</strong> question to <strong>the</strong>ir period. Therefore <strong>in</strong> order to<br />

arrive at a positive knowledge, we must first of all determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />

<strong>the</strong> time when <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>scriptions were written. This fundamental<br />

work hav<strong>in</strong>g been omitted by Sayce and Wright,<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir hypo<strong>the</strong>sis lacked <strong>the</strong> necessary confirmation.<br />

The problem may be attacked from more than one side.<br />

It would be a great step <strong>in</strong> advance, if with some degree of<br />

certa<strong>in</strong>ty we could fix<br />

<strong>the</strong> relative chronology of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>scriptions,<br />

<strong>the</strong> relative order of <strong>the</strong>ir composition. It is a species<br />

of picture writ<strong>in</strong>g that we have to deal with, and <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>scriptions, though not <strong>in</strong><br />

to a considerable extent, may still<br />

many of<br />

all, <strong>the</strong> constituent characters,<br />

be recognized as pictures.<br />

Thus <strong>in</strong> some <strong>in</strong>stances we f<strong>in</strong>d an animal head with certa<strong>in</strong><br />

characteristic features ; <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs, however, we f<strong>in</strong>d correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to it what is recognized to be an animal head only

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!