Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht

Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht

searchformecca.com
from searchformecca.com More from this publisher
31.03.2015 Views

498 EXPLORATIONS IN BIBLE LANDS / m m, ,-' t- / i *)\ ;i^5 J \ to southeast, and fairly represents the direction of Ur-Gur's rampart. Apart from their fragmentary height, the excavated portions are in almost perfect condition. Though uninscribed, the crude bricks of which they are composed in size, color, and texture are identical with those in the centre of the ziggurrat, and therefore may safely be ascribed to the great royal builder from Ur (about 2700 b. c). The exposed northwest section is a little over 750 feet long and 25^ feet thick. Its exterior is effectively broken up by eighteen i buttresses, which average in width eleven feet,' 2 and project two feet from the face of the wall. The spaces or panels between them, as a rule, measure almost thirty feet. The inside surface of the structure is not nearly so well preserved as the exterior, but there is evidence that buttresses were also used to some extent, similar to those on the outside. Both faces of the wall were covered with a thin plaster of clay which protected the sloping 3 sides against storm and rain. The highest part of Ur-Gur's ruined Northwestern Section of the Northeastern City Wall b\ Fisher 1 We found only seventeen, but the eighteenth can be restored with certainty. It stood in the deep cut (marked No. 2 in the zinctype), through which the latest inhabitants passed out of the ruined enclosure into the open plain. 2 The second from the pre-Sargonic gate is an exceptionally wide buttress, which measures 13^3 feet in width. 3 The slope or batter of the wall was in the proportion of 1 to 3.

DURING 19th CENTURY: ASSYRIA AND BABYLONIA 499 structure measured nine feet, and was covered with a mass of disintegrated adobes. Its base rested on a foundation of clay laid up en masse (No. 12), which extended seven feet beyond the outer face of the wall and was nearly six feet high, 1 with practically the same slope as the latter. The remains of Naram-Sin's wall (about 3750 b. c.) are very insignificant compared with those of Ur-Gur's. The reason is very apparent. A glance upon Fisher's accompanying sketch shows that Naram-Sin's wall (No. 3) met Ur-Gur's in an angle of io° 30'. The last-mentioned king therefore, in modifying the plan of the earlier ruler, was forced to raze the old wall in order to prevent the enemy from using it as a base of operation against his new rampart. Consequently Naram-Sin's structure is preserved only where it lies beneath the wall of Ur-Gur, who, as far as possible, utilized it as a foundation for his own bulwark. From the fact that the axis of the upper sidewalk of the pre-Sargonic gate ( No. 6 ), previously described, is perpendicular to the line of Naram-Sin's fortification restored, we infer that Sargon's famous son built his wall according to the plan of one of his predecessors. The course of this wall, however, differed essentially from that of the earliest rampart 2 and from that of the time of Ur-Gur, both of which practically followed the same general trend. All attempts on the part of the architects to fix the inner face of Naram-Sin's enclosing wall have been unsuccessful, so that, Haynes' previous assertions 3 to the contrary, we still are in absolute ignorance of 1 It descended, therefore, to the level of the present plain, which lies somewhat above that of Ur-Gur's time. This indicates that the ground on which the 'foundation was laid had previously been raised. It is very probable that an earlier wall, afterwards partly covered by Ur-Gur's foundation, once occupied the same site. 2 Which must have been perpendicular to the axis of the lower sidewalk of the pre-Sargonic gate. 3 Reproduced in Hilprecht, " The Bab. Exp. of the U. of Pa.," series A, vol. i, part 2, pp. 20, seq.

DURING <strong>19th</strong> CENTURY: ASSYRIA AND BABYLONIA 499<br />

structure measured n<strong>in</strong>e feet, and was covered with a mass<br />

of dis<strong>in</strong>tegrated adobes. Its base rested on a foundation of<br />

clay laid up en masse (No. 12), which extended seven feet<br />

beyond <strong>the</strong> outer face of <strong>the</strong> wall and was nearly six feet<br />

high, 1<br />

with practically <strong>the</strong> same slope as <strong>the</strong> latter.<br />

The rema<strong>in</strong>s of Naram-S<strong>in</strong>'s wall (about 3750 b. c.) are<br />

very <strong>in</strong>significant compared with those of Ur-Gur's. The<br />

reason is very apparent. A glance upon Fisher's accompany<strong>in</strong>g<br />

sketch shows that Naram-S<strong>in</strong>'s wall (No. 3) met<br />

Ur-Gur's <strong>in</strong> an angle of io° 30'. The last-mentioned k<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong>refore, <strong>in</strong> modify<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> plan of <strong>the</strong> earlier ruler, was forced<br />

to raze <strong>the</strong> old wall <strong>in</strong> order to prevent <strong>the</strong> enemy from us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

it as a base of operation aga<strong>in</strong>st his new rampart. Consequently<br />

Naram-S<strong>in</strong>'s structure is preserved only where it<br />

lies beneath <strong>the</strong> wall of Ur-Gur, who, as far as possible,<br />

utilized it as a foundation for his own bulwark. From <strong>the</strong><br />

fact that <strong>the</strong> axis of <strong>the</strong> upper sidewalk of <strong>the</strong> pre-Sargonic<br />

gate ( No. 6 ),<br />

previously described, is perpendicular to <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

of Naram-S<strong>in</strong>'s fortification<br />

restored, we <strong>in</strong>fer that Sargon's<br />

famous son built his wall accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> plan of one of his<br />

predecessors. The course of this wall, however, differed<br />

essentially from that of <strong>the</strong> earliest rampart 2 and from that<br />

of <strong>the</strong> time of<br />

Ur-Gur, both of which practically followed<br />

<strong>the</strong> same general trend. All attempts on <strong>the</strong> part of <strong>the</strong><br />

architects to fix <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ner face of Naram-S<strong>in</strong>'s enclos<strong>in</strong>g<br />

wall have been unsuccessful, so that, Haynes' previous assertions<br />

3 to <strong>the</strong> contrary, we still are <strong>in</strong> absolute ignorance of<br />

1<br />

It descended, <strong>the</strong>refore, to <strong>the</strong> level of <strong>the</strong> present pla<strong>in</strong>, which lies somewhat<br />

above that of Ur-Gur's time.<br />

This <strong>in</strong>dicates that <strong>the</strong> ground on which<br />

<strong>the</strong> 'foundation was laid had previously been raised. It is very probable that<br />

an earlier wall, afterwards partly covered by Ur-Gur's foundation, once occupied<br />

<strong>the</strong> same site.<br />

2<br />

Which must have been perpendicular to <strong>the</strong> axis of <strong>the</strong> lower sidewalk<br />

of <strong>the</strong> pre-Sargonic gate.<br />

3<br />

Reproduced <strong>in</strong> <strong>Hilprecht</strong>, " The Bab. Exp. of <strong>the</strong> U. of Pa.," series<br />

A, vol. i, part 2, pp. 20, seq.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!