Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht

Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht

searchformecca.com
from searchformecca.com More from this publisher
31.03.2015 Views

DURING 10 in CENTURY: ASSYRIA AND BABYLONIA 373 It is Haynes' view, as reproduced by me in 1896, that, with the exception of the lowest front face and the two conduits, Ur-Gur's ziggurrat was built entirely of crude bricks, and that even at the time of the Cassite and Assyrian occupations the upper stories had no casing walls of baked bricks. This theory seems to me untenable. For there are many indications which necessarily lead to the conclusion that the whole pyramid, from the time of Ur-Gur down to Ashurbanapal, was properly protected. I cannot go into details here. To mention only one circumstance, it would be impossible to explain the presence of so many stamped bricks of Ur-Gur, found out of their original position everywhere in the ruins of Nuffar, except on the assumption of a casing wall for every stage of the ziggurrat. It was only natural that the bricks of the earlier builders should be removed by the later monarchs before they repaired and enlarged the temple. But the very fact that the material of Ashurbanapal's casing walls of the lowest story consists largely of bricks of Ur-Gur and Kadashman-Turgu, and that the construction of the Seleucido-Parthian rulers contained a great number of stamped and unstamped bricks of all the three Babylonian kings mentioned, is alone sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the entire outside of the ziggurrat must have been built of baked bricks. While working towards the second stage from the upper edge of the lowest story, Haynes discovered the opening of a large well in the centre of its northeast facade and partly overlapping the ancient conduit. It was built of baked bricks, and descended through the crude mass of the stage-tower down to the water level. Though unable to determine its age and special purpose at this remarkable place, Haynes was inclined to ascribe it to Ashurbanapal. But this is impossible. In connection with my subsequent visit to the ruins, I could p v ove conclusively that this well did not belong to the ziggurrat proper, but was constructed

DURING 10 <strong>in</strong> CENTURY: ASSYRIA AND BABYLONIA 373<br />

It is Haynes' view, as reproduced by me <strong>in</strong> 1896, that,<br />

with <strong>the</strong> exception of <strong>the</strong> lowest front face and <strong>the</strong> two conduits,<br />

Ur-Gur's ziggurrat was built entirely of crude bricks,<br />

and that even at <strong>the</strong> time of <strong>the</strong> Cassite and Assyrian occupations<br />

<strong>the</strong> upper stories had no cas<strong>in</strong>g walls of baked<br />

bricks. This <strong>the</strong>ory seems to me untenable. For <strong>the</strong>re<br />

are many <strong>in</strong>dications which necessarily lead to <strong>the</strong> conclusion<br />

that <strong>the</strong> whole pyramid, from <strong>the</strong> time of Ur-Gur down<br />

to Ashurbanapal, was properly protected. I cannot go <strong>in</strong>to<br />

details here. To mention only one circumstance, it would be<br />

impossible to expla<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> presence of so many stamped<br />

bricks of Ur-Gur, found out of <strong>the</strong>ir orig<strong>in</strong>al position everywhere<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ru<strong>in</strong>s of Nuffar, except on <strong>the</strong> assumption<br />

of a cas<strong>in</strong>g wall for every stage of <strong>the</strong> ziggurrat. It was<br />

only natural that <strong>the</strong> bricks of <strong>the</strong> earlier builders should<br />

be removed by <strong>the</strong> later monarchs before <strong>the</strong>y repaired and<br />

enlarged <strong>the</strong> temple. But <strong>the</strong> very fact that <strong>the</strong> material<br />

of Ashurbanapal's cas<strong>in</strong>g walls of <strong>the</strong> lowest story consists<br />

largely of bricks of Ur-Gur and Kadashman-Turgu,<br />

and that <strong>the</strong> construction of <strong>the</strong> Seleucido-Parthian rulers<br />

conta<strong>in</strong>ed a great number of stamped and unstamped bricks<br />

of all <strong>the</strong> three Babylonian k<strong>in</strong>gs mentioned, is alone sufficient<br />

evidence to demonstrate that <strong>the</strong><br />

entire outside of <strong>the</strong><br />

ziggurrat must have been built of baked bricks.<br />

While work<strong>in</strong>g towards <strong>the</strong> second stage from <strong>the</strong> upper<br />

edge of <strong>the</strong> lowest story, Haynes discovered <strong>the</strong> open<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of a large well <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> centre of its nor<strong>the</strong>ast facade and<br />

partly overlapp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> ancient conduit. It was built of<br />

baked bricks, and descended through <strong>the</strong> crude mass of <strong>the</strong><br />

stage-tower down to <strong>the</strong> water level. Though unable to<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>e its age and special purpose at this remarkable<br />

place, Haynes was <strong>in</strong>cl<strong>in</strong>ed to ascribe it to Ashurbanapal.<br />

But this is impossible. In connection with my subsequent<br />

visit to <strong>the</strong> ru<strong>in</strong>s, I could p<br />

v<br />

ove conclusively that this well<br />

did not belong to <strong>the</strong> ziggurrat proper, but was constructed

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!