31.03.2015 Views

Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht

Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht

Explorations in Bible lands during the 19th century - H. V. Hilprecht

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

178 EXPLORATIONS IN BIBLE LANDS<br />

explored at an expense of $ 200,000 with<strong>in</strong> a period of<br />

twenty-five years. The results, though scarcely ever furnish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

a document referr<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> life and person of Abraham,<br />

— as has been expected, — will doubtless add many<br />

fresh stones to <strong>the</strong> ris<strong>in</strong>g build<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> early history of<br />

Babylonia.<br />

Previous to his second visit to Muqayyar, early <strong>in</strong> 1855,<br />

Taylor excavated for a few days at two o<strong>the</strong>r ru<strong>in</strong>s, called<br />

Tell el-Lahm and Abu Shahra<strong>in</strong>. The former ru<strong>in</strong>, consist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of two mounds of some height surrounded by a<br />

number of smaller ridges and elevations, is situated three<br />

hours to <strong>the</strong> south of Suq esh-Shiyukh, near <strong>the</strong> dry bed of<br />

an ancient canal, and does not exceed half a mile <strong>in</strong> circumference.<br />

Noth<strong>in</strong>g of especial <strong>in</strong>terest was discovered. But<br />

Taylor exhumed numerous coff<strong>in</strong>s formed of two<br />

large jars<br />

jo<strong>in</strong>ed toge<strong>the</strong>r by a bitumen cement, traced several pavements<br />

constructed of baked bricks, occasionally bear<strong>in</strong>g defaced<br />

cuneiform characters, and found a perfect clay tablet,<br />

so that <strong>the</strong> Babylonian orig<strong>in</strong>, though not <strong>the</strong> early name<br />

of <strong>the</strong> site, could be established beyond any reasonable<br />

doubt.<br />

Of greater<br />

Shahra<strong>in</strong>, situated <strong>in</strong><br />

which separate it<br />

importance were Tavlor's excavations at Abu<br />

<strong>the</strong> desert bevond <strong>the</strong> sandstone bluffs<br />

from Ur and <strong>the</strong> valley of <strong>the</strong> Euphrates,<br />

but — strange to sav — very generally placed wrongly by<br />

Assvriologists on <strong>the</strong> left side of " <strong>the</strong> great river," somewhere<br />

opposite Suq esh-Shiyukh, 1 though its correct situa-<br />

1<br />

With whom this error started I do not know. We f<strong>in</strong>d it <strong>in</strong> Menant,<br />

Babylo?ie et la Chaldee (1875), and Delitzsch, Wo lag das Paradies ?<br />

(1881) — notwithstand<strong>in</strong>g Taylor's very explicit statements to <strong>the</strong> contrarv.<br />

George Rawl<strong>in</strong>son, "Five Great Monarchies," 4th ed., London,<br />

1879, v °l- n -> ("Map of Mesopotamia," etc.) places Abu Shahra<strong>in</strong> correctly,<br />

on <strong>the</strong> right side of <strong>the</strong> river, but too far to <strong>the</strong> south. About where<br />

Tell el-Lahm is situated is Abu Shahra<strong>in</strong>, and where he has Abu Shahra<strong>in</strong><br />

is Tell el-Lahm. The ru<strong>in</strong>s of Abu Shahra<strong>in</strong>, situated as <strong>the</strong>y are <strong>in</strong> a deep<br />

valley, cannot be seen from Muqavvar, nor are <strong>the</strong>v identical with Nowawis,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!