Update re Howard Case - The ENRON Fraud

iJ
U.S. Department of Justice
Criminal Division
Washington, D.C. 20530
June 10, 2009
VIA FAX at (619-231-7423) and EMAIL at P
G. Paul Howes, Esquire
Coughlin Stoia Rudman & Robbins LLP
655 West Broadway, Suite 1900
San Diego, California 92101
Re: United States v. Kevin Howard, Cr. H-03-93-03
Dear Mr. Howes:
On June 1, 2009, defendant Kevin Howard, former chief financial officer and vice
president of finance for Enron Broadband Services (EBS), entered a guilty plea to one count of
falsifying Enron's books and records, in violation of Title 15, United States Code, Sections
78m(b)(2)(A), 78m(b)(5) and 78ff).
Pursuant to the terms of the plea agreement, Howard faces a maximum sentence of
up to twelve months of home detention at sentencing. A sentencing hearing is scheduled for
November 2, 2009 at 9:30 a.m. before Judge Vanessa D. Gilmore in Courtroom 9A, United
States Courthouse, located at 515 Rusk Avenue, Houston, Texas.
If you believe you were a victim in U S. v. Kevin Howard, you have a right to submit a
Victim Impact Statement in the form of a letter before sentencing to explain how the crimes
affected you and/or your family. Victim Impact includes physical, emotional and/or financial
loss. If you elect to make a submission, please complete the enclosed Victim Impact Statement
Form and mail it to: United States Probation Office, Attn: Gail Winkler, Supervising U.S.
Probation Officer, US P.O. Box 61207, Houston, TX 77208-1207, no later than August 4, 2009.
Updated information on this case and other Enron-related cases is available on the
Criminal Division's Victim Witness webpage at: http://www.usdoj.gov/criminallvns/index.html.

We appreciate your continued assistance in providing notice of case events to members
of the shareholders' class action lawsuit captioned Newby et al. v. Enron Corp., et al.,
No. 11-01-3624.
Enclosures
(1) Plea Agreement - June 1, 2009
(2) Victim Impact Statement Form
2

Case 4:03cr00093 Document 1596 FHed in TXSD on 06/01/2009 Page 1 of 13
l\ fill: I U IT DII11rTCORf
i" 1J IRk I EXAS
.Ut)LSiU\ U1\ ISIO/,
1"dTl D F\T1 ()1 \\1IRTCA §
§
§
§
LL\ 1 IIU\\ \RD. §
§
I)Fenda §
Cr No, H-O3-9 "
\
] he United States of America by and h n i1 tcven A. Tyrrell. Chief of the Fraud
I Criminal Divis on, Uni d e: Dep fJustice, and ,fIhiI E. Lopez and
1. ua N. Perkins, Trial Attorneys, end the Defendant, K n I d, by and thti ik
eouJ. Rrv 3. Pollac pursuant to Rule 1 l(e)(l)(C) of the Federal Rules of Criminal
Proccdui . state that they have entered into an agreement, the terms and conditions of which are
as Ibilows:
I he Dc tcuda at' grc. uient
Ilie '_P : 10 p1 s;
Indictment chir'iag hdi n ith f1fin' t wd rLI n it1 15, United States
Code, Scn La(b)(2)(A, ' t.d off, T1 )11::, by this plea, agrees
that he i. rw 'ti ;senrial to the i:kHunt
charged ith Suerscding indictment p: o
tu auiy or proven beyond a reasonable
doubi
2. t ott' L L': ati a nensation of any son,
I of 13

Case 4:03cr00093 Document 1596 FUed in TXSD on 06/01/2009 Page 2 of 13
directly or indirectly. fo:' the dissemination through books, articles, speeches, interviews, or any
'i:neans, of information iriine his work at huron or the tition or prosecution of
any civil or ct case :eiirtt him. The Defendant further aiecc :nt to ethere, ic cent any
aeration vi' compensation resulting from his emploent at huron.
3. The Defbndant agrees that this Plea Agreement hinds only the riminat Di\ noon
of the US. Deparment nf Justice and the Defendan:: It bac rot bind atre U:bted Si Attorney
or any other Uk icion of the Deprrnucni ni Jiice
Punishment !ang&'
4. The statetory niavnnuni peinikv icr a nLtion of Title 15, United States Code,
78m(b)(2)(A), 78m(b)(5) and 78ff, is imprisonment for a term of not more than ten
years and a fine of not more than $1,000,000 or twice the gross pecuniary gain to the Defendant
or loss to the victim(s'. o hiehever is greater. Title 15, United States Code, Section 78ff; Title
18, Unitek S:ac Code, Sections 3S71(b)(1) and (d). ;nd:ticnaiv, tue Defendant may receive a
term of nope:vi:cd release after imprisonment of up ic three years. Title 18. United Si:Oes Ccdu.,
Section 3583b. The IT elDodaro ackno\vledees and undecrands that shouV he violate the
conditions of supervised release which may be imposed as part of his sentence, then the
Defendant may hr iiopr coned for an additional term of up to two years, without credit her time
already served an the tern of supervised teiotrc prior to such violation. Title 18, United Sta:es
Code, Section 35$3(e)(3). The Defhndarit understands that he cannot have the imposition or
execution of the sentence suspended, nor is he eligible for piroic.
Page 2 of 13

Case 4:03cr00093 Document 1596 FHed in TXSD on 06/01/2009 Page 3 of 13
I
n d atory Special Assessment
5 a' L e ute ode SeCtion 3013a)(2)(A), ImmCdlatCl)
awr he Dc it to thc (!erh 2the United D tt Ci a special
assessment in the amount of one hundred dollars ($ 11)0.00). The payment will be by
check or money order payable to the Clerk of the Uwrd Suates District Court, do Distii:
Clerk's Office, P.O. Bo 61010. Texas 7720, Aniion: Finance.
\\jver ()1. \ j))ca I
6. The Deftndant is .. t Title 18, United States Code, Section 3742, afThds a
Defendant the right to anpeal the itcn imposed. Additionally, the Defendant i airthat
Tu c 2, Uncd tw
ode. itin 2255 affords the riht n contest or c2ftLi°aRy athLd" a
after the Con\tr:,n or nence has become final. 11 th Cou
ccpN the
PL eHl rth tciiCS th Dc!cu1Ln1 thin the agreechupon ntecint
forth a p .eriphl2, )cfendant 1gcL to a the right to appc:ii the tcae Hft i or
the marmer in which '.aa determined, and the Defendant waives the right to contest his
conviction or sentence by means of any postconviction proceeding.
7. in agreeing to these waivers, the Defendant is aware that a sentence has not yet
been determined by the Court. The DJnhutt k also aware that any promise, i
prc;ctt1ttion, or
estimate of the ptbL c:ttr aina unJ.a tft: iriCifl Cuideiinc; trtr he may
received frcm hi the Unitci Ste;, or the Prohatien (Tt'iie is a prediction, not a
promise, and is nct hincing on the Unitch gattes. the Probat RiM )lh,e, or the Court. other than as
provided in p'rMph The Del
rr:nt IiulJ r understands nd 1ria thMt he Sentc: rig
Gihd:i are 1tcMtR,lv rio' ftr'' to thri '''J Booker, i25 S. Ct. 738
f 13

Case 4;03cr00093 Document 1596 Filed in TXSD on 06/0112009 Page 4 of 13
(205\ icording1y, ti'e Deferdnt understands that, although the Court must consult the
i1'fl ,, :jd&1jie5 and r'e ic to icin ien sentence i:eceUnt, the
Let k not bwci t fine; eS fleele jU nC fld iS nOt r uired sceiee the
D:Uant within the cate ited ui ewe rwee I lowever, if Court acccpt this Plea
Abuement, the Court is bouLld by h nw:me crovision in pw'agraph 12.
8. The DefHeie : ew awl wwes that all waivers contained in
are ie exel " the co ewwcie made by iic Uw wd eww in this Plea Ag:wcut. if
the Deker 'eriructs his artorney to tile a notice of appeal of his seutcuce or af his comeiction,
or ifihe i)efcudant instincts his attorney to file any other postconviceoe
needwo twtuig
en iei inn eenwrwe, the 1 cede en understand hen the United Seew v eciflc
pw iec entlen Def:nder' e nh ens in this PUn ceiwend ofene DefendetI'S
appee iu conteOon or sentence and of the Defende s rriit Ic e y pcet con h
proccewnw attacking his conviction or sentence.
The United States' \crccrnents
9. if the Dc dorr complies fully with all ofbis I, ; under this Plea
Arement, the United 4ews agrees to dismiss the olenuning cuna of the Sixth Supersedinu
cc wd any r iri:nu indictments at the tin:e of sentencing and en recommend :thet
Defea ii ic uentenced within the agreed upon senture 11d ran ret fbrth in parafrah 12.
United Siates onWuivcr of Appeal
10. The United Steen crew the rigdi en eany out its reronsibilities under
dcimw urtcneing. Specifudle die United States reserves th
(a) in h we en crdn tee ihee ni en. inJrdii e iLielce lie aid any
lace 4 of 13

Case 4:03cr00093 Document 1596 Filed in TXSD on 06/01/2009 Page 5 of 13
f ,vc,i jye,ive d ?cs, to the atntk n nc Probation Office in connection with that
'sepurdtc1 ofr p YL• Cl;
(b) to set forh or hrc
tcdcinc L. S •dlcr J i rcm. i:c:
(e of facic.; or facts in 1ccdcc ith the Defendant's
i:ic1 1 :c it:i ( tLe;
(dl IL c'hling cc iczciie. accordance with LLS,S.G. Section
2 iJ tIe 18, Uct J Sc L dc, cticn 3553(a) and
(C) to j lci cc'cc i'd or thc cnrcr hich it \se'rccJ
ni h,c tic C rt DcCcknt dN,JC F c't feith
V:1 12
Sentence Determination
11. The ndcn ac. tLtt thc c]icc'e will be inipoco Uer ihdcration of
thc :ic (uid. ij:-, iich re only advisory, as well as the provisions of Title 18, United
State C. Section 3553(a). The United States and th Derc t tgree that the arp blc
Sentencing Guidelines range exceeds the agreedupon sentc . range contained parcc aph 12,
12. Pursuant to Rule I 1(c)(I)(C') of the FcJcJ RL efCriminrl It ,ccdi
S d ll'C Dafcji. c'rcc 'hct a a wtthin the rc:c f412 ;:iai
c ur some cc cbc :i u1erco is th df a disposition ofthc cc.
The Del iJa that, if the C urt rejects the Pled dlccnieni. ifte Court must hI
j:ciL die te Court ric die P1u \diccic a.' e lu )cd1dac pcraali
i L.: Cue 'a I teu.' I te I' Ic the Pita \c 'cun ca eIe a c Ut- 'd j,t the
or'crtamty to wilhdrtc 'die plea, and (iii) advise the DefLudarl pc1 tiP'; i if the plea is ret
1 a, the Cu di' - of the case less lavorably tc id Ihe ciu 11 an the l'lee
i-i F.. C] t
Page 5 of 13

Case 4:03cr00093 Document 1596 Filed in TXSD on 06/01/2009 Page 6 of 13
IUfhts at Trial
13. The De ncci: iopi cci ihc C tn he is satiCcc } cotomevs have
ncnc. IhU DcihioLiiit dcriJn4L nt h: entci inn iiic Plea
\ni0 c ndcc
)i iC. I icent. The Defendant
ici Jcct tho ic oi ntidini nuindo mu
) if the Du duct ccud ii p1cc cfnot gui'ty to the charges. tIm i)nfomcni
would h p trial i t c i Ti trial
ma) I t without a y j I L P r t'i United
nd thu cion
(b)
At c thL tL. [:nituHlnns would mc ud ic p mont v. imoscos mcd othcr
c dcncc' unoinc I )ci undauc. I fccdcnt v odd hnvo ftc opoomini ttv to
ntmod o:isscnnd mis onmov o uId ho cIloood to cmm,arnine
in thu )ctdninct could, hut would Pot Pc requod to. prc5cn!
1 1 oIl S 1l 4 1 i I ill t t C
flo dci t wouLd nt uppucs m ointm k he could wqnre th u jidunco thoth
the suhp cnn powcr of the cod t,
(c) At trici. ho 1 ho on Woo con ci cclv on c prh'ilcpo 'ncimct cchincr inmiiinh on cod
1 no I ii o il oi 1 I or to
,t
W Wi mc D 'là t dc ud ) 0 1 1 tu 0 on Ii OWfl
bLnmth.
Factiuni Bnsis for Guih\ Plea
14. The lWicw to plead guihu ocuc he in fact uihy of the offoise
charged ii . nont 5 cW tho SWSJS Supcrcwhng ladici cicuc. If this case wero 0 proceed to timal, the
United So: would pmve each element of that oh cno bovoud cusinulmlc doubt. The
Ioioudci ctntnnd ct the Unitod Stm w 1'u'oudm: tostimony and mccl cccl
ci mu mm m em dnimw 0 onir! conimlcti thu k cc np facts:
(a)
Ac ci brA coin tulic Wow ft'cndnrit, Kevin liwocid, throupli his
parlopunoc In thu Ito':: Cccit' irnimiuction, which c loccd on [)ncccihc' 22,
200) mw 0 iii Li c o i ,ctl I n I cmi 10K
Page 6 of 13

Case 4:03cr-00093 Document 1596 FHed in TXSD on 06/01/2009 Page 7 of 13
-cr'Jirin 2001) ti' he f tiuifed, iii t I: 0K did flO n..rictc rd
in iC J1c i1nl, 1ic rd innt' "-H
1. Ic, Lr'tcd 'n- CL-. :iit-n
7$n1b (A, iO)( n I
(b) i '-n ii ' "1 cr i' Oic'n cci H'.i headq fticd in T--;-Hn
n-in ni n'i i if r1tc cr
\- tcn-J c -i.-. I ni( \
d'' lljni T1', H 1 I I I
'' ii ll -t1lCiitn md 'Fi fl
n n:ni iL "liRd.
L:iilninl nnnic n mcd nJi n hiL:iss opmn, Arthur Andersen
a I nr-:H u .H-nc-. tant duninc thc relevant time period.
(c) \c ni :1:t co iH cc Ui Ji t )ifl lm'n flinIIv iniicd d ir 'n
:o.i'ncd services I hH i tin iibIt H nc .c nt cc he nc
1cIirv Skili:cn 1cr-Id lIini cHc i.\icic Iflcc-c :IiincI to
hc iuiic i 111111 1mI\ Cl Inn 11111 it (Ulil ml c\u C Hem
cr2 :Hitm. 11: II' kiIlin ciLd j''tEBS
n nLI 'no i -1 Y ) ni hoc,
(d) II ' . UJ- On C ICI mci-il dfterr nrd Vice Pr innit rift n-ceee tit
i-i iiioulmcjt tcc mm ,HH, I Imnnrd nc respontb1n h-n ,,LPLY nu all
ct- mf:iuctmircl cc ti-Il ;nc1ons it EBS.
-
(e) 1* fr-jr ii
l,nHi cl 2-moO, LLS Imi tiLd to 'nImtjC aim 'i
'c\cminc nH n Icc ol -i.n 7ublidy H-cLned eami:t H t.
I mo nmc d mt1'cm- :ml I'I mt 1 1 ien dinw th:c iH-cnt
m m- 'iij CI -i U :n-i-ctinu. I I i ' u Id r I dc' ini 'icmccd
till :m U mdc cnn-in. \\ lien I U-. mmd dii mcI hcltc' c dc iii- liii c ci TS to
men m C.Cii i ncct UjH n fl'Jcm brIm mIt 1'1hilaklY it
lj'mninI 1mr:m nid nil. it LB iht I-B ncc ii mlimn-
(f) Din :'g this Sinun umcn Lame, EBS w ' ttL-niptiH In in nch a - nico mon
tcn'mnd ('VUl) ho--in-c- cc coin ml I.-[Ld \ iii humnc nn o 20 \cn'
l_I nmJ I o Jmntcr. :nici I LI -. tie ij the hudnf
In Il r I,
- '-, l-c I- 1 il-ic COT;le,cm.
TIm .1 i Ictimpi I lnImc',Itc c nm lis sufficier i :n the previ- cUt /
nim mimn- CI cii mnc, -, 'cm cc Howard asknd c mmio EB to ci mien I]
Rime dcc 'cvmcni i ee ifEBS could rncu'ntnn tiIim.Ic ccrcnm ;
the ci ccineot ti the foi: cucoer of 2000. iIoU mnnl anT m hmc LBS
7 of 13

Case 4:03-cr00093 Document 1596 FHed in TXSD on 06/01/2009 Page 8 of 13
Sn rjad a tr action Vt: a ject Rnt a aart" i' itn'ed to
"an J/ t': a tt(H .1 a: tji:r: ra'n and •:ah flow tiaui 11a
a J nera ra: ti auai t.. r ci Utj a
h) In oider for EBS to legitinratal oyra 'a future canal. from the
},khiajet aeaiciit. (1 \'1na'aan tt tat I ad li: (1 fcrtn
ii anlara ii1 n LiI',R tan a that un a aniv 'a tda jaint
in
tv. a U nint antarL: a a ::II Ia:tniu 01 ii niarra .eJo1nt
tiare \ ate rat tI a ala o inc iflI t ai could tIc ha is o :o fill the
ea'nir ,;: tcad,
i) As r caca: 20 aL B'- id nt yer tia: in outside party for the joint
ye u': ni :1': a:inn' ap I1U Uaa.l a itatarl a 'aica, ceautitly,
in 2t))(, I I i' and and HF ar I L app''hna nCuI' aii,tTI
V )D tea in' 1 ic: a iapav :n: i in Ucu a lan, Ut a 'n and 'd tira
sa :: s ra at aL ha 1 n( uha \aOllIJ ha \v:l I :t: to ha LBS's jo: it \ aIitUr'a
latin: : dat LB aould inact its ea1fliI target for the year 2)0h,
(j) Thou':! ad 1 .:'ni'in ' I Id and and others at iit, Cu.:
Ufl(f':H ad that ii 'ui,Id na iUat In i,at:II in any wai It ''tap inn
in U' act 13':: ala it as I' 13a s ra vat it arc railer. Indeed, nuia' ' told
by 1 iv. id ann ihi tait act! :aa' tuti &'tIr transaction Cask s ad be
pad! ha [non. In addtiun. I ii arC dinad nCuhe that LBS 'a aat.si as a
shot tat a narticipant in tha junt otn This suited nCuhe, :s 1 Ia',', rd
k.riau iiat aCud: was cash poor a 1': tilH and coulci a t rCk t: i r p its
moan a a ('Hit S nanre for tha I 'i: 'an:, HOwiid tad nthe:' a LIdS
:rit 'acd til 'iii: I i v,'n anna ',i atange for lit nbc Iii ha Ini,dh' out of
the taint rat'',,: b iliad pitt: ti: ca 'tcxt quartan lIo\\ irJ c"platned to
nCn a 1:1 ( '1:i1":,ttoii Iii "IC Ult S clitiliL i':a" o'i'ica
men at t:i a:' I:1 iv thC ,trtra
(k) nCuae, canci to pIa:na I ii i and hopian a a:utc OS position a: ii atidor for
7dm a i rn:t a i"rcd ti thejoiti nantuts' jai'tncrbased on tic sche:,
a h Howaid 'ad others, that i :, ,It t ot rat
nil'; nd would ha I e in the next qaai n
(1) P : I ra aln',rt alfinad . tract 'bar 22, 7 aid I IS s ibsca' cnth' sold
i:tar:slti IC ,i,t scuLL : Il'aI, .tt!\nat,t'ci'a
na L : i: a ,r:'i,ra a an 'inn iL,'ndC a' ti ii:: [at quarter
of2OUO, l'r'jaa: Is:::, I'': a,. 'sled [i37 t leant tI: pilji,,, 'Sat! H'' ,inij a
l.ssgoalprcC' tiy'ra by"iIin: a; tin 1s, 'tract va i'pO'I in
I 'mw's 10K fo 'ic year 2000.
i.e: 8of13

Case 4:03cr00093 Document 1596 Fifed in TXSD on 06101/2009 Page 9 of 13
(ni) Prc tn i: cic of Proec. ft:c chcrt. F1ov d kcn ti.r \ncrzen
c:cI\ Hct lye ag 1 1 BS : 1 .CflCH 1 Cd W1H
t ir .t hadk. 1LC c H 1CC cHIt
Cti1 cc in ihc (i t cL:ftr of 20 1 cR1 .nJ oci d prc 1HIR.ly
• :dwi± cI uh: [1 ird irlhcr i H lIH \ndcN:1I i'c1 with
Li ac: 1111cc H ic iiC:1 -:cn& . H: iusc ic: ci uCube as a
t•cJpjr1iI:1 ii .i r JI1cJ icinain in djmt eniwe indciinitely,
(II) I cc c d L Icc, il;ully failed to inform ci cr ccuse
AI:rcn ic T1R c IHI CCCbL capectatRi \V:R. till iN 1HfliCi CCII
inC C lift ''Hi '\..N [U:ci\ H lCL thRIll f' I i icc. LHI/.: Cd IilIif s in
thC IR1I iu.rtcr Hid t Hi 1 NpcCic1 1C cHi iic fIN I :nturc cc I cr HeN
quc ici 1 ir md u1dcc.rN1 tiN ; l.iCHcfl cwcd U •cc KtcN iicrcrcd H
th:ir HirlI 'i fthc tr iurc of PoiccL i.hcaii and NS':hi1ity to
reco.i I/c c:iings.
(o) SimilcU':, kNard knowingly and willfclle •liilcr i ilci i nCube prior to
th Icc. tic p linsaction that he Irid lccrncd tiN i c could not be
tHit LC ii tic lUst quarter as cri1t:iali' :cccH H tie time, Howard
H•. riri ic. .t •'t impoaitt tcct lot nCuhe, ycl H d others at LBS
tall 111 lc.ckc.c it IC UNIV.
(p) A- , cUlt ci Ilol. crl'l lii ire ic. disclose CI•1IcT:H1 Läcts to both n(uhe and
\iidi eii I lo'd mdi ccl c.icci tc H ikcl rcorded as rd cnhi
cim fscm ProjN t 1c.H'. cCc,irt, in that J nrc ' books tird recIcH
ilrons 111K icr tic cci 2000, fa:lcd fcluimIcK c.i: iii ly
r ml. :. im icasonahi: d:tdl, tH :c. c1mc.s a do po ii: 1 tic :c.c f
q) by :id u d:iiOc1< the 'v nn in viclation of Title 15, United States Code,
Sectic:il itn(by()(A\ ,4(•:I) .10 " f.
Breach n f P1cc \ ccc m ccl
15, lithe fltfcrdmt should fail in any way to fulfill ccmplcicH ,Ul of'ic
oh! •Hn WI ci his P? A.reement, the I 'nited States will he relec H from its
hr •r ci: i
e Plc Hr,'ctii: :,tid tc. Dc'i art N olc:l md : ltcnce will stand
N i limI has breached aa\ im c Hi ii of this Plea Agreement shall he
deteimmed solely ly the United States tF ommdm 11i: Frud S'cti ci
'fthe Ct Hut! Division
of 13

Case 4:03-cr-00093 Document 1596 Fied n TXSD on 06/01/2009 Page 10 of 13
Dcpartnientc svhose uiiirt fl tit flnl.
I (I
i11 fliifflilcflt \' fi
16. The Drfd rcc ii pect to all iii I 1.e Sixth
d 1ndietinen ab :J action. as well a all i1 1 ii in this
is not a iTfl. party" neaning of the Hyde
617, PL 105-1 19 (Nov. 26. ih not file an ci nn ur it law.
CompI&
\trtcuicnt
I 7 T1u.
tta Pka A'reernent, inJudii the attached addLuduir f
1)efendant and his attornc , u ti't the complete Plea \u nnt betv un United
i)efendant, and his counsel. No promises or rcrer:. 1fluins have bce, ime by
td states except as set forth writing m this P1e u rment, Thc Defendn
tat no threats rr 'ren n,_1•
ftt him a1 th i
freely and vol.r.r h bc:uir I
[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BI ANK}
I 0ofl3

Case 4:03cr00093 Document 1596 Filed in TXSD on 06/01/2009 Page 11 of 13
18, A: modification of this Plea Arinont must be in ::n and signed by all
Filed at Flouston, Texas. on June 7, 2009.
) /
1/
K/iu fl,4" 1
p$r. '
Subscribed and sworn to before me on June (,2009.
M!LTIAEL N. MILBY
uciUEL: STATESDIiruCTCL.TkK
By:
_____
Dep ty Unitod Diric Clerk
APPROVED:
STEVJ'4 \. Ti iLLLL
Lrii: Dj. ion
itd Dooo o
By:
Jonatbn I. Lopez
Seni' Anarney
Lor \.
Tri: I i\ tn oy
fl I )y tO
/ //
E duia/i
Barry Il:cL. Fsq.
fr dx flcdJuft
UOcO L1: 1
Whti !)(
LW: T- 46
Fax: 2(i):40152
\,llts, *\.
11 ofi3

Case 4:03cr00093 Document 1596 Fed in TXSD on 06/01/2009 Page 12 of 13
UNITED STA1 ES OF A\l ER1C.\ §
IN TILE UNIIL 1) STVFFS DISTRICT COURT
SOULDI R\ DI'IRICTO1 TF\\
Il(ftSTGN !) \IS1O
§
§ Cr. No. HO393 (Gilmore. 3.)
§
K[\1\ R)\VAR1), §
§§
PLEA ACRFEi [NT ADDENDUM
I have fdly evpkined ts Lk.kiot his rights with respect to the Sixth
S sp dms. 1cIeiç ipel udn Count 5. 1 have reviewed the i' suns ofth 1nt!
H I fully and cdrfidv explained to the Defendaot de
provisions i hec Guidelines whes isy apply in this case. I have also explained to the
Defeidant that iee Sentencing GuideIne sre only advisory. Further, 1 have carefully
rev : cd e. par: of this Plee Aereement the I )cldiidnet. To my ku ledne. the
Det::init decji In enten eto tnis Flea Agreement is an informed and voluntary one.
- __ ______
iPff\ hUnch, i:co, Date
AHrney for the Deheden
P 'ofi3

Case 4:03cr4J0093 Document 1596 Filed in TXSD on 06/01/2009 Page 13 of 13
p i: \T;R1F'\ L'\I
JT1 jth TV lt1 1:'
the SIXth SupcrI'' HcrncnL i ding
IIV !(.nid ii ht- jtl r
5, agais uie. My tLumc hi iH
c nnd and I un .:nd iIi rp to the provisions ofthe iit
1FUI i U1d1 j ppiy i my case. I have read ad LL'rcftli ed
every pari ilfilis Pc mnt th u it:rney. ! ucrd this k1e Ar rncit and I
voIuntuii: cc nn.
P:c 3ofi3

UNITED STATES v
Case Number:
VICTIM NAME:
INDIVIDUAL VICTIM IMPACT STATEMENT/FINANCIAL CRIME
How have you and members of your family been affected by this crime?
Please continue this statement on an additional sheet of paper if you wish.
Have you or members of your family received counseling as a result of this crime? Please explain.
Have you filed a civil suit against the defendant? If yes, please list the case name, court location, and
docket number.

VICTIM IMPACT STATEMENT FINANCIAL CRIME PAGE 2
Do you relate to people differently since the crime? Please explain.
How has the crimes affected you and your family's lifestyle? Please explain.
Has the crime affected your family's livelihood? Please explain.
Have you experienced any of the following reactions to the crime:
PLEASE REALIZE THESE ARE NORMAL REACTIONS TO A TRAUMATIC EVENT OR SITUATION.
- Anger -
Anxiety -
Fear - Grief - Guilt - Numb - Chronic Fatigue
-
Sleep Loss -
Nightmares -
Appetite Change - Unsafe -
Uncontrolled Crying
-
Trouble Concentrating -
Repeated Memory of Crime -
Depression
Please describe any other reactions to the crime committed.
Do you feel the defendant is or will be a threat to you, your family or the community?
Yes - No Please explain.
What else would you like the Judge to know about the defendant, or your situation as a result of
the crime.
If a victim consents, the Court may also make restitution in services in lieu of money, or make
restitution to a person or organization designated by a victim. If you are interested in this option,
please explain.

CONFIDENTIAL
United States v.
Case Number:
The address and telephone contact information provided below will only be provided to the
presentence probation officer, and the United States Attorney's Office, unless a court order
signed by the Judge authorizes the release of this page to the Court and attorney for the
defendant.
Printed Name:
Signature:
Address
Phone: (hm)_____________ (wk)_________________
fax:
e-mail: