29.03.2015 Views

Challenges to Rural Poverty Reduction in Viet Nam - Oxfam Blogs

Challenges to Rural Poverty Reduction in Viet Nam - Oxfam Blogs

Challenges to Rural Poverty Reduction in Viet Nam - Oxfam Blogs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Five-year Synthesis Report<br />

Part 2: <strong>Challenges</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Rural</strong> <strong>Poverty</strong> <strong>Reduction</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Viet</strong> <strong>Nam</strong><br />

TABLE 2.12. Percent of households sell<strong>in</strong>g no products and buy<strong>in</strong>g no<br />

materials, 2007-2011<br />

75<br />

Commune<br />

Sell<strong>in</strong>g no products <strong>in</strong> the<br />

last 12 months (%)<br />

Buy<strong>in</strong>g no agricultural<br />

materials <strong>in</strong> the last 12<br />

months (%)<br />

2007 2011 2007 2011<br />

Thuan Hoa 42 17 10 2<br />

Ban Lien 9 26 20 17<br />

Thanh Xuong 48 7 17 0<br />

Luong M<strong>in</strong>h 96 89 93 89<br />

Duc Huong 22 8 10 8<br />

Xy 26 9 98 98<br />

Cu Hue 7 15 7 20<br />

Phuoc Dai 51 33 56 58<br />

Phuoc Thanh 44 43 85 89<br />

Thuan Hoa 52 48 50 41<br />

Average 40 30 45 42<br />

SOURCE: Household <strong>in</strong>terviews<br />

Improvements <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>frastructure, <strong>in</strong>formation and communication has improved market<br />

access for many people. New markets <strong>in</strong> Thuan Hoa-Ha Giang (2008), Ban Lien-Lao Cai<br />

(2008) and along the road from Ky Son district through Cham Puong, Luong M<strong>in</strong>h-Nghe<br />

An (2010) has provided people with the opportunity <strong>to</strong> buy and sell produce. However,<br />

local residents <strong>in</strong> remote mounta<strong>in</strong>ous ethnic m<strong>in</strong>ority areas participate less <strong>in</strong><br />

the market than K<strong>in</strong>h <strong>in</strong> lowland areas, as they still rely on traditional upland farm<strong>in</strong>g<br />

for domestic consumption and do not use commercial supplies. In Luong M<strong>in</strong>h-Nghe An<br />

and Phuoc Thanh-N<strong>in</strong>h Thuan, the proportion of people with access <strong>to</strong> markets is the<br />

lowest, and poverty <strong>in</strong>cidence the highest.<br />

The capacity <strong>to</strong> engage <strong>in</strong> market transactions with few <strong>in</strong>termediaries leads<br />

<strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong>comes. In lowland communes, with favourable transport roads, people<br />

have more choices for sell<strong>in</strong>g agricultural produce or purchas<strong>in</strong>g agricultural supplies.<br />

In Cu Hue-Dak Lak, people can sell agricultural produce (hybrid corn, coffee and pepper)<br />

directly <strong>to</strong> agents or traders. They can also buy agricultural supplies directly from private<br />

sales agent networks. In remote communes, local shops play a very important role. People<br />

can borrow rice, seeds, fertilizer and other necessities for home consumption. They can<br />

even borrow money <strong>to</strong> attend wedd<strong>in</strong>gs and funerals and <strong>to</strong> pay children’s school fees.<br />

Although repayment is often <strong>in</strong> k<strong>in</strong>d, <strong>in</strong>terest rates tend <strong>to</strong> be high (up <strong>to</strong> 3-4%/month).<br />

The Government no longer supports households with transportation or price subsidies,<br />

but, s<strong>in</strong>ce 2010, provides cash or k<strong>in</strong>d of 80,000 VND per person per year <strong>in</strong> Category<br />

II communes and 100,000 VND per person per year <strong>in</strong> Category III communes (Decision<br />

102). Most communes at the moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>ts apply for <strong>in</strong>-k<strong>in</strong>d support, based on the<br />

stated needs of poor households. However, the system has had some difficulties: as<br />

funds were not disbursed <strong>in</strong> time the costs of seeds <strong>in</strong>creased as a result of <strong>in</strong>flation<br />

and seeds were provided <strong>to</strong>o late for plant<strong>in</strong>g. In a number of <strong>in</strong>stances prices for<br />

agricultural output rose slower than <strong>in</strong>puts, reduc<strong>in</strong>g farmers’ purchas<strong>in</strong>g power (see<br />

Section 4 “Cop<strong>in</strong>g with Price Volatility”).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!