Challenges to Rural Poverty Reduction in Viet Nam - Oxfam Blogs
Challenges to Rural Poverty Reduction in Viet Nam - Oxfam Blogs
Challenges to Rural Poverty Reduction in Viet Nam - Oxfam Blogs
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Five-year Synthesis Report<br />
Part 1: <strong>Poverty</strong> Trends and Key Themes of <strong>Rural</strong> <strong>Poverty</strong> <strong>Reduction</strong><br />
TABLE 1.5. Near-poor, 2008 - 2011 (%)<br />
Commune Accord<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> old poverty l<strong>in</strong>e Accord<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> new poverty<br />
l<strong>in</strong>e<br />
Late 2008 Late 2009 Late 2010 Late 2011<br />
Poor<br />
HHs<br />
Nearpoor<br />
HHs<br />
Poor<br />
HHs<br />
Near<br />
poor<br />
HHs<br />
Poor<br />
HHs<br />
Nearpoor<br />
HHs<br />
Poor<br />
HHs<br />
Nearpoor<br />
HHs<br />
Thuan Hoa 42.8 - 35 7.3 62 15 56.4 15.8<br />
Ban Lien 59.9 10.4 54.5 3.7 82.7 - 63 10.8<br />
Thanh Xuong 11.2 3.5 8.2 0.6 11,7 6 7.5 5.6<br />
35<br />
Luong M<strong>in</strong>h 78.7 - 83.6 9.2 94 4.3 85.3 9.1<br />
Duc Huong 40.6 31.7 28.4 23.6 52.5 19 43.3 18<br />
Xy 49.8 18.9 42.2 26.7 73.5 8.1 72.1 6.1<br />
Cu Hue 11.9 13 8.7 14 15.4 17.9 11.4 14<br />
Phuoc Dai 58.4 32.9 58.2 10 64.2 11.9 57.8 16.6<br />
Phuoc Thanh 56.5 32.7 52.8 16.5 77.2 7.4 70.9 11.8<br />
Thuan Hoa 33.9 12.1 28.5 19.3 32.7 16.5 26.7 6.5<br />
SOURCE: Statistics of the poor and near-poor households are provided by communes<br />
Note: (-) no statistics available.<br />
There are currently two policies support<strong>in</strong>g near-poor households: (i) members of nearpoor<br />
households are entitled <strong>to</strong> a 50 percent discount on the cost of voluntary health<br />
<strong>in</strong>surance; and (ii) children <strong>in</strong> near-poor households are entitled <strong>to</strong> concessional loans<br />
<strong>to</strong> pursue vocational tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g or secondary and tertiary education. The second policy<br />
appears <strong>to</strong> be the most effective. Households whose children are <strong>in</strong> further education<br />
are often given priority for near-poor status, so that they can access concessional<br />
loans. There is little <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> the health <strong>in</strong>surance subsidy. Households lack funds and<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation and the opportunity <strong>to</strong> purchase health <strong>in</strong>surance.<br />
1.4. Vulnerability<br />
In 2011, rural people felt natural disasters and epidemics/pests were the two primary<br />
difficulties they faced. As <strong>in</strong> 2008 <strong>in</strong>flation was also a problem <strong>in</strong> 2011 (See Section 4<br />
“Cop<strong>in</strong>g with price volatility”).