29.03.2015 Views

Challenges to Rural Poverty Reduction in Viet Nam - Oxfam Blogs

Challenges to Rural Poverty Reduction in Viet Nam - Oxfam Blogs

Challenges to Rural Poverty Reduction in Viet Nam - Oxfam Blogs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Participa<strong>to</strong>ry poverty moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> rural communities <strong>in</strong> <strong>Viet</strong> <strong>Nam</strong><br />

28<br />

Mostly work<strong>in</strong>g away from home, local jobs (casual or more permanent), trad<strong>in</strong>g<br />

or small bus<strong>in</strong>esses. Most migrant workers concentrate <strong>in</strong> the lowland and K<strong>in</strong>h<br />

dom<strong>in</strong>ated areas (Thanh Xuong-Dien Bien, Duc Huong-Ha T<strong>in</strong>h, and Thuan Hoa-<br />

Tra V<strong>in</strong>h). Most are young or middle-aged.<br />

• Education: Use of <strong>in</strong>come from agricultural and non-agricultural work <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>vest<br />

<strong>in</strong> children’s and young people’s education (at most moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g sites).<br />

The exercise summariz<strong>in</strong>g direct reasons contribut<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> better life at the<br />

moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>ts. The methodology “life his<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>in</strong>terviews” <strong>in</strong> the last five years<br />

(2007-2011) was applied <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>-depth <strong>in</strong>terviews of households selected <strong>in</strong> the survey<br />

Non-agricultural employment<br />

(<strong>in</strong>cl. migration)<br />

Children, young<br />

HHs<br />

Youth, middle-aged<br />

Middle-aged, elderly<br />

Education<br />

Agricultural employment<br />

Infrastructure improvement<br />

Market, employment opportunities<br />

Social and productive services<br />

round <strong>in</strong> 2011. The responses of 110 households are summarized <strong>in</strong> Table 1.4.<br />

TABLE 1.4. Reasons for better life at the moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>ts, 2007-2011<br />

No. Direct reasons for better life over the last five Frequencies<br />

years<br />

1 Diversified, <strong>in</strong>tensive commodity production 66<br />

2 Gradual accumulation from lives<strong>to</strong>ck breed<strong>in</strong>g 42<br />

3 Local casual jobs 29<br />

4 Work<strong>in</strong>g away from home 27<br />

5 Benefit<strong>in</strong>g from Government’s support policies (<strong>in</strong> hous<strong>in</strong>g 25<br />

construction, rais<strong>in</strong>g children with disabilities, social<br />

assistance and allowance...)<br />

6 Expand<strong>in</strong>g area of productive land 23<br />

7 Hav<strong>in</strong>g more man power 13<br />

8 Trad<strong>in</strong>g, bus<strong>in</strong>ess and agricultural services 9<br />

9 More goods exchanges, purchase 7<br />

10 Households with members who are <strong>in</strong> de<strong>to</strong>xification<br />

3<br />

centres or work<strong>in</strong>g away from home<br />

11 Gett<strong>in</strong>g married <strong>to</strong> foreigners 1<br />

SOURCE: In-depth <strong>in</strong>terviews of selected households

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!