Challenges to Rural Poverty Reduction in Viet Nam - Oxfam Blogs
Challenges to Rural Poverty Reduction in Viet Nam - Oxfam Blogs
Challenges to Rural Poverty Reduction in Viet Nam - Oxfam Blogs
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
20<br />
TABLE 2. Characteristics of the 20 villages <strong>in</strong> the poverty moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g network<br />
Prov<strong>in</strong>ce Ha Giang Lao Cai Dien Bien Nghe An Ha T<strong>in</strong>h Quang Tri Dak Lak N<strong>in</strong>h Thuan Tra V<strong>in</strong>h<br />
District Vi Xuyen Bac Ha Dien Bien Tuong Duong Vu Quang Huong Hoa Eakar Bac Ai Cau Ngang<br />
Commune Thuan Hoa Ban Lien Thanh Xuong Luong M<strong>in</strong>h Duc Huong Xy Cu Hue Phuoc Dai Phuoc Thanh Thuan Hoa<br />
Soc<br />
Chua<br />
Thuy<br />
Hoa<br />
M’Hang Ta Lu 1 Ma Hoa Ma Du Da<br />
Ba<br />
Cai<br />
Xy La Dong<br />
Tam<br />
Troan<br />
Ô<br />
Huong<br />
Tan<br />
Huong<br />
Tho<br />
Cham<br />
Puong<br />
Xop<br />
Mat<br />
Chan<br />
Nuoi 2<br />
Pa<br />
Dong<br />
Doi 1 Khu Chu<br />
Tung1<br />
M<strong>in</strong>h<br />
Phong<br />
Village Mich<br />
B<br />
Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No<br />
Phase 2 of<br />
Programme 135<br />
Delta Delta<br />
Low<br />
mounta<strong>in</strong><br />
Low<br />
mounta<strong>in</strong><br />
Low<br />
mounta<strong>in</strong><br />
Highland Low<br />
mounta<strong>in</strong><br />
Low mounta<strong>in</strong><br />
Highland<br />
Low<br />
mounta<strong>in</strong><br />
Low<br />
mounta<strong>in</strong><br />
Low<br />
mounta<strong>in</strong><br />
High mounta<strong>in</strong><br />
Valley High<br />
mounta<strong>in</strong><br />
Low<br />
mounta<strong>in</strong><br />
Valley High mounta<strong>in</strong><br />
Topography Valley High mounta<strong>in</strong><br />
97 52 30 30 86 93 37 170 140 102 48 33 147 156 294 188 142 94 274 396<br />
Total number of<br />
households<br />
Kh’mer<br />
(67%)<br />
K<strong>in</strong>h<br />
(33%)<br />
Kh’mer<br />
(80%)<br />
K<strong>in</strong>h<br />
(20%)<br />
Raglai<br />
(95%)<br />
Raglai<br />
(95%)<br />
Raglai<br />
(67%)<br />
K<strong>in</strong>h<br />
(33%)<br />
Ede (94%) Raglai<br />
(47%)<br />
K<strong>in</strong>h<br />
(52%)<br />
K<strong>in</strong>h<br />
(95%)<br />
Van Kieu<br />
(99%)<br />
Van Kieu<br />
(97.6%)<br />
K<strong>in</strong>h<br />
(100%)<br />
Kh’Mu (98.7%) K<strong>in</strong>h<br />
(100%)<br />
Thai<br />
(98%)<br />
K<strong>in</strong>h<br />
(93.5%)<br />
Thai (80%)<br />
K<strong>in</strong>h<br />
(20%)<br />
H’Mong<br />
(100%)<br />
Tay<br />
(100%)<br />
H’Mong<br />
(100%)<br />
Ma<strong>in</strong> ethnicity Tay<br />
(98%)<br />
2 4 2 13 2.5 4 0.4 12 1 1.5 1.5 0.5 6.5 2 0.6 2.1 0.4 2.7 1 3<br />
Distance <strong>to</strong> the<br />
commune centre<br />
(km)<br />
0.5 4 2 5 0 0 0.4 12 0.2 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0 0 0.6<br />
Distance <strong>to</strong> the<br />
nearest road (km)<br />
2 4 1.5 15 1 1 0.4 12 1,2 1 1.5 0.5 6.5 2 0.5 1.7 0.1 3 1 2.5<br />
Distance <strong>to</strong> the<br />
nearest commune<br />
healthcare centre<br />
(km)<br />
0.5 0 2 0.2 2 3 0.4 0.2 0.03 1.5 1.5 0.5 1 0,1 0.5 0.6 0.2 1.5 0.5 1<br />
Distance <strong>to</strong> the<br />
nearest primary<br />
school (km)<br />
1 5 2 15 2.6 3 0.4 4 1 1.7 1.5 0.5 3 2 0.5 1 1.2 3 1.5 2.5<br />
Distance <strong>to</strong> the<br />
nearest secondary<br />
school (km)<br />
16 20 30 15 6 5 17 26 12 8 8 6 7.5 2 1 1 14 13 0.5 2.5<br />
Distance <strong>to</strong> the<br />
nearest high school<br />
(km)<br />
2 4 2 15 1 1 17 26 1 1.5 24 22.5 7 2 0.5 1.7 14 13 1 2.5<br />
Distance <strong>to</strong> the<br />
nearest market (km)<br />
10000 10562 N/A N/A 385 350 N/A N/A 1002 718 9620 N/A 2692 900 1351 2710 11953 6397 712 2280<br />
Average agricultural<br />
land/person (m 2 )<br />
520 450 315 310 380 800 120 147 300 270 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 315<br />
Average food /<br />
person/year (kg)<br />
58.0 47.0 66.7 93.0 47.6 2.7 84.0 95.0 50.7 53.1 81.0 71.9 15.8 15.3 43.0 69.1 81.9 63.4 35.1 39.5<br />
Village poverty<br />
rate by the end of<br />
2010 (%)