Complementarity: Contest or Collaboration? - FICHL

4.4.10. The Right of the Person Concerned to Challenge the
Admissibility.................................................................. 154
4.4.11. The Burden of Proof ...................................................... 155
4.4.12. Who Should Have the Final Say Regarding the
Adequacy of the Domestic Proceedings? ...................... 156
4.5. Some Tentative Conclusions ...................................................... 157
5. Pål Lønseth:
Between Territoriality and Universality:
Reflections by a Core International Crimes Prosecutor ................. 161
6. Cedrik Ryngaert:
Complementarity in Universality Cases: Legal-Systemic and
Legal Policy Considerations ........................................................... 165
6.1. Introduction ................................................................................ 165
6.2. The Sovereignty Dimension ....................................................... 167
6.3. The Absence of a Transnational Ne Bis In Idem Principle ......... 170
6.4. The Absence of a Credible Threat Posed by the Bystander
State ............................................................................................ 172
6.5. Positive Complementarity .......................................................... 175
6.6. The Direct Effect of Article 17 of the Rome Statute in the
Domestic Legal Order ................................................................ 177
6.7. Customary International Law: Ascertaining State Practice with
Respect to Horizontal Complementarity .................................... 181
6.8. In Support of Domestic Courts Applying a Horizontal
Complementarity Principle ......................................................... 187
6.9. Lessons from Recent Spanish Practice ....................................... 190
6.10. Concluding Observations ........................................................... 197
7. Christopher K. Hall:
The Role of Universal Jurisdiction in the International Criminal
Court Complementarity System ...................................................... 201
7.1. Introduction ................................................................................ 201
7.1.1. A Preliminary Brief Note About Universal
Jurisdiction ..................................................................... 202
7.1.2. Universal Jurisdiction in the Rome Statute:
Inadmissibility and Duty ................................................ 207
7.1.2.1. Principles of Interpretation ............................. 207
v