25.03.2015 Views

NC Register Volume 21 Issue 09 - Office of Administrative Hearings

NC Register Volume 21 Issue 09 - Office of Administrative Hearings

NC Register Volume 21 Issue 09 - Office of Administrative Hearings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CONTESTED CASE DECISIONS<br />

f. Ranitidine (Acid Reflux);<br />

g. Lexapro (Irritability, anxiety);<br />

h. Tylenol #3 (pain in legs);<br />

i. Nexium (Acid Reflux);<br />

j. Rhinocort Aqua (Allergies);<br />

k. Allergy shots (Allergies);<br />

l. Singular (Allergies/asthma); and<br />

m. Albuterol (asthma).<br />

6. Petitioner’s mother’s testimony confirmed the above listing at the time <strong>of</strong> the hearing. (T p. 34). She described Risperdal as<br />

“supposedly given for obsessive-compulsive disorder, meaning that it should help [Petitioner] with being fixated and worrying about<br />

stuff all the time about what he wants and all—and it does help some but not all the way.” (Id.)<br />

7. The listed neurological impairments result in behaviors that are rare, both in their unpredictability and severity. In the<br />

opinion <strong>of</strong> Mr. Piper, who serves as a Qualified Developmental Disabilities Pr<strong>of</strong>essional and supervises Petitioner’s services,<br />

Petitioner “is probably one <strong>of</strong> the most unique cases I’ve ever had in my 30 or 40 years experience.” (Piper Deposition p. 8)<br />

8. One the complicating factors in working with Petitioner is his unpredictability. Mr. Piper described: “And that’s what makes<br />

[Petitioner] very unique, that you’ll be sitting there and talking to him, and all <strong>of</strong> sudden you’ll lose eye contact, and he’ll just get up<br />

and walk <strong>of</strong>f, almost like a horse with blinders. … And you can call after him, and there’s no answer. You don’t know when this is<br />

going to occur. You don’t know why it occurred.” (Piper Deposition pp. 9-10)<br />

9. Petitioner demonstrates rapid, unpredictable mood shifts with threatening behaviors. (T pp. 36, 37-39, 41, 108, Piper<br />

Deposition p. 9, Respondent’s Ex. 1 p. 8)<br />

10. While Petitioner can appropriately engage with others in public settings, he is subject to disruptive behaviors, such as<br />

throwing food, upsetting store displays and yelling obscenities at black store patrons. (Piper Deposition p. 15, T pp. 18, 39, 59) He<br />

will <strong>of</strong>ten present as a shy individual with females in public, while behaving defensively with males. (T pp. 44-45)<br />

11. Responding to Petitioner’s aggressive behaviors <strong>of</strong>tentimes requires counter-intuitive actions. Attempting to restrain<br />

Petitioner has the effect <strong>of</strong> escalating his behaviors and instigating a physical altercation. (T pp. 32, 39, 42, Respondent’s Ex. 1, pp. 9-<br />

13)<br />

12. Petitioner, while verbal, is inarticulate, <strong>of</strong>ten resorting to cursing, which increases the difficulties <strong>of</strong> understanding his needs<br />

and the monitoring <strong>of</strong> his behaviors. (T pp. 38, 41, 43-44, 92, Respondent’s Ex. 1 pp. 8, 13)<br />

13. Petitioner can be verbally aggressive toward individuals; threatening to “burn your house down,” “kill your dog,” and<br />

actually damage vehicles by throwing stones. (Piper Deposition, p. 11, T p. 42, Respondent’s Ex. 1, p. 9)<br />

14. Petitioner is prone to gastrointestinal pain, which is difficult for Petitioner to articulate. (T p. 40) Petitioner’s legs can<br />

unexpectedly go weak, causing him to fall. (Respondent’s Ex. 1, p. 10) Petitioner needs prompting and assistance with toileting.<br />

(Respondent’s Ex. 1, pp. 18-19)<br />

15. While Petitioner presents with numerous challenges, he can present an enjoyable, engaging side. He can tell a joke and<br />

express a sense <strong>of</strong> humor. (Piper Deposition p. 13) He can enjoy riding a go-cart or all terrain vehicle, playing with friends and<br />

listening to music. (T pp. 49, 59, 88)<br />

Petitioner’s Socialization<br />

16. Neighbor children periodically visit with Petitioner. He regularly accompanies his mother on shopping trips, even interacting<br />

with store clerks to set up purchases on layaway. The family periodically takes Petitioner to public eating spots for meals. (T pp. 58-<br />

60, 87)<br />

17. Petitioner has deficiencies in social interaction with females. (Piper Deposition, p. 13)<br />

18. Petitioner’s most recent psychological evaluation, showed socialization to be a “relative strength,” with a Vineland Adaptive<br />

Behavioral Scale <strong>of</strong> 61. The evaluator commented:<br />

[Petitioner] is capable <strong>of</strong> making and keeping appointments. He watches television for practical day-to-day information. He<br />

maintains a hobby and initiates conversational topics <strong>of</strong> particular interest to others. He will apologize for mistakes or errors<br />

in judgment. He is capable <strong>of</strong> keeping secrets or confidences for as long as is appropriate. [Petitioner] is prone to make<br />

statements which may embarrass or hurt others. He has difficulty in controlling his anger or hurt feelings when denied his<br />

own way. Often times he does not use appropriate table manners unless told to do so. He does not tend to independently<br />

weigh consequences <strong>of</strong> actions before making decisions.<br />

<strong>21</strong>:<strong>09</strong> NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER NOVEMBER 1, 2006<br />

857

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!