VERIFICATION REPORT - MyClimate

VERIFICATION REPORT
- VOLUNTARY EMISSION REDUCTION –
SOUTH POLE CARBON ASSET MANAGEMENT
18.86 MW Bundled Wind Power Project, India
VERIFICATION PERIOD
2001-07-12 TO 2006-12-31
(Including both days)
Report No: 53700307-07/XX
Date: 2007- June- 07
TÜV NORD CERT GmbH
JI/CDM Certification Program
Langemarckstraße 20
45141 Essen, Germany
Phone: +49-201-825-3335
Fax: +49-201-825-3290
www.tuev-nord.de
www.global-warming.de
1 of 21

Date of recommendation: Project No.:
2007-06-07 53700407-07/XX
Approved by: Organisational unit:
Mr. Rainer Winter
Client: Client ref.:
South Pole Carbon Asset Management Mr. Patrick Burgi
Summary:
TÜV NORD JI/CDM Certification Program
Project Title “18.86 MW Bundled Wind Power Project, India”
Name of Project Participant As per section 1.3 of this report
UNFCCC Ref No. NA
Registered PDD and
ACM0002: “Consolidated baseline methodology for grid-connected electricity
Approved CDM Methodology
used for Verification
generation from renewable sources” (Version 06 date. 19/05/2006)
Scope of Verification This scope of this engagement covers the verification and certification of voluntary
greenhouse gas emission reductions generated by the above mentioned project
covering 2001-07-12 to 2006-12-31.
Verification Opinion The verification is based on the revised monitoring report (June 2007 Version 01),
the monitoring plan as set out in the validated PDD, the validation report, emission
reduction calculation spreadsheet and supporting documents made available to the
TÜV NORD JI/CDM CP by the project participant.
As a result of the verification, the verifier confirms that:
• All operations of the project are implemented and installed as planned and
described in the validated project design document.
• The installed equipment essential for generating emission reductions runs
reliable and is calibrated appropriately.
• The monitoring system is in place and functional. The project is ready to
generate GHG emission reductions.
As the result of the verification, the verifier confirms that the GHG emission reductions
are calculated without material misstatements in a conservative and appropriate
manner. TÜV NORD JI/CDM CP herewith confirms that the project has achieved
emission reductions in the above mentioned reporting period as below:
Baseline Emissions 99075 t CO2eq
Leakage 000 t CO2eq
Project Emissions 000 t CO2eq
Total Emission Reduction Verified 99075 t CO2eq
Work carried out by:
Asim Kumar Jana, Manojkumar Borekar, Hemant
Joshi, Swapnil P Thanekar
Work verified by:
Mr. Rainer Winter
2 of 21
No distribution without permission from
the Client or responsible organisational
unit
Limited distribution
Unrestricted distribution

Abbreviations
CAR Corrective Action Request
CO2 Carbon dioxide
CO2eq Carbon dioxide equivalent
CEA Central Electricity Authority
CR Clarification Request
CDM Clean Development Mechanism
ER Emission Reduction
GHG Greenhouse gas(es)
ISO International Standardisation Organisation
MW Megawatt
MWh Megawatt Hours
MP Monitoring Plan
MR Monitoring Report
PDD Project Design Document
PP Project Participant
QA/QC Quality Assurance / Quality Control
SPC South Pole Carbon
UNFCCC United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
VER Voluntary Emission Reduction
3 of 21

Table of Contents Page
1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 5
1.1. Objective 5
1.2. Scope 5
1.3. Project Entities 6
1.4 Project Location 6
2. VERIFICATION TEAM..................................................................................... 9
3. METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................... 11
4. VERIFICATION FINDINGS ........................................................................... 12
4.1. Summary of Findings and Conclusions 10
5. VERIFICATION STATEMENT....................................................................... 18
6. REFERENCES .............................................................................................. 19
4 of 21

1. INTRODUCTION
South Pole Carbon Asset Management (SPC) has commissioned the TÜV NORD
JI/CDM Certification Program (formally UNFCCC accredited DOE) to carry out the
verification of the project: “18.86 MW Bundled Wind Power Project, India”, with
regard to the relevant requirements for voluntary emission reduction on demand /CON/ .
The verifiers have reviewed the implementation of the monitoring plan (MP), for the
VER project for the first crediting period 2001-07-12 to 2006-12-31.
The applied monitoring methodology is “ACM0002: Consolidated baseline
methodology for grid-connected electricity generation from renewable sources”
(Version 06 date. 19/05/2006). GHG data related to voluntary emission reduction for
the monitoring period covering 2001-07-12 to 2006-12-31 was verified in detailed
manner using set of requirements, audit practices and principles as required under
verification criteria.
This report presents the findings and conclusions of the verification assessment of
voluntary emission reduction.
1.1. Objective
The purpose of this verification, by independent checking of objective evidence, is as
follows:
- To verify that the project is implemented as planned and described in the project
design document /PDD/ ;
- To confirm that the monitoring system is implemented and fully functional to
generate voluntary emission reductions (VERs) without any double counting; and
- To establish that the data reported are accurate, complete, consistent,
transparent and free of material error or omission by checking the monitoring
records and the emissions reduction calculation.
1.2. Scope
The verification of this registered CDM project is based on the validated project
design document /PDD/ , the monitoring report /MR1/, /MR2/ , emission reduction calculation
spread sheet /XLS/ , supporting documents made available to the verifier and
information collected through performing interviews and during the on-site
assessment. Furthermore publicly available information was considered as far as
available and required.
The TÜV NORD JI/CDM CP has, based on the recommendations in the Validation
and Verification Manual /VVM/ , employed a risk-based approach in the verification,
focusing on the identification of significant risks and reliability of project monitoring
and generation of emission reductions.
5 of 21

1.3. Project Entities
Project Participant: M/s Vivek Pharmachem (India) Ltd.
M/s Gem Crafts Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.
M/s ERCON Composites
M/s S G Associates
M/s Sanjay D Ghodawat
M/s Sanjay D Ghodawat (HUF)
M/s Star Flexi-Pack Industries
M/s James Andrew Newton Art Exports Pvt. Ltd.
M/s Chemical and Mineral Industries Pvt. Ltd.
M/s Shree Ram Industries
M/s Shree Ram Gum and Chemicals
M/s Vanaz Engineers Ltd.
M/s B.S.C. Textiles
M/s B.S. Channabasappa & Sons
M/s Hindustan Distilleries
M/s S. K. Parik
M/s Universal Starch Chem Allied Ltd
M/s Jaychandra Agro Industries Pvt. Ltd.
M/s Unique Sugars Limited
M/s Shri Charbhuja Sales Corporation
M/s Vishnu Textiles Corporation
M/s Vandana Textiles
M/s Umang Textiles
M/s Awade Industries Private Limited
M/s Suttatti Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.
M/s Mayura Steel Pvt. Ltd.
Contact person: Mr Deepak Zade
Tel: 020-25533309 /25533206
deepakzade@indiatimes.com
Mr Deepak Zade
Project Consultant: MITCON Consultancy Services Ltd
Kubera Chambers, Shivajinagar,
Pune 411005
India
Contact Person: Mr Deepak Zade
Tel: 020-25533309 /25533206
deepakzade@indiatimes.com
6 of 21

1.4. Project Location
Geographical location of each district where WTGs are installed:
District Latitude Longitude
Chitradurga (Karnataka) 14º 14´ N 76º 24´ E
Nagarcoil (Tamil Nadu) 08º 10´ N 77º 26´ E
Sangli (Maharashtra) 16º 52´ N 74º 34´ E
Satara (Maharashtra) 16º 59´ N 74º 08´ E
Dhulia (Maharashtra) 20º 54´ N 74º 47´ E
Jaisalmer (Rajasthan) 26º 55´ N 70º 54´ E
7 of 21

Location of Each Project:
Location Village/
Taluka
District State
M/s Vivek Pharmachem (India)
Ltd.
Elladakere Chitradurga Karnataka
M/s Gem Crafts Enterprises
Pvt. Ltd.
Elladakere Chitradurga Karnataka
M/s ERCON Composites Valliour, Nagarcoil Nagarcoil Tamilnadu
M/s S G Associates Kundlapur, Kavthe
Mahakal
Sangli Maharashtra
Sanjay D Ghodawat Van Vilas Sagar Chitradurga Karnataka
Sanjay D Ghodawat (HUF) Van Vilas Sagar Chitradurga Karnataka
M/s Star Flexi-Pack Industries Van Vilas Sagar Chitradurga Karnataka
M/s James Andrew Newton Art
Exports Pvt. Ltd.
Valliour, Nagarcoil Nagarcoil Tamilnadu
M/s Chemical and Mineral Village Bhu, Kita, Jaisalmer Rajasthan
Industries Pvt. Ltd.
Pithado ki Dhani,
M/s Shree Ram Industries Village Bhu, Kita Jaisalmer Rajasthan
M/s Shree Ram Gum and
Chemicals
Village Bhu, Kita Jaisalmer Rajasthan
M/s Vanaz Engineers Ltd. Khori, Sakri Dhulia Maharashtra
Vankusavade,
Patan
Satara Maharashtra
Gawadewadi, Satara Maharashtra
M/s B.S.C. Textiles
Patan
Vankusavde,
Patan
M/s B.S. Channabasappa & Gawadewadi, Satara Maharashtra
Sons
Patan
Vankusavde,
Patan
M/s Hindustan Distilleries
Vankusavde,
Patan
Satara Maharashtra
8 of 21

Location Village/
Taluka
District State
S. K. Parik Aral, Patan Satara Maharashtra
M/s Universal Starch Chem
Allied Ltd
Bramhanwel, Sakri Dhule Maharashtra
M/s Jaychandra Agro Bramhanwel, Sakri Dhule Maharashtra
Industries Pvt. Ltd.
M/s Unique Sugars Limited Bramhanwel, Sakri Dhule Maharashtra
M/s Shri Charbhuja Sales Gojegaon, Patan Satara Maharashtra
Corporation
M/s Vishnu Textiles
Corporation
Devshi, Patan Satara Maharashtra
M/s Vandana Textiles Devshi, Patan Satara Maharashtra
M/s Umang Textiles Devshi, Patan Satara Maharashtra
M/s Awade Industries Private
Limited
Devshi, Patan Satara Maharashtra
M/s Suttatti Enterprises Pvt. Kati, Patan Satara Maharashtra
Ltd. Kumminaghatta,
Holallkere
Chitradurga Karnataka
M/s Mayura Steel Pvt. Ltd. Matrewadi Satara Maharashtra
Madakaripura Chitradurga Karnataka
2. VERIFICATION TEAM
- The Verification Team was led by Asim Kumar Jana, TUV Nord - Mumbai, India.
Mr. Jana, M.Tech (Env Engg), Dipl in Industrial Safety, is a TUV-CERT Lead
auditor for ISO 9001/14001 and OHSAS 18001. He is Head - CDM Certification
for TÜV Nord India operation and holds energy auditorship from Bureau of Energy
Efficiency of India. He is an appointed assessor for JI/CDM certification program
of TÜV Nord. For this verification he was assisted by:
- Manojkumar Borekar, TÜV Nord -Pune, India. Mr. Borekar, M.Tech. (Energy
Management), B.E. (Mechanical Engineering) and Certified Energy Auditor by
Bureau of Energy Efficiency of India (Ministry of Power). Currently he is GHG
and Energy Auditor-CDM Services for TÜV NORD India operation. He is an
appointed CDM/JI Assessor for TÜV NORD JI/CDM CP and performed validation
and verification of several CDM projects.
- Hemant V. Joshi, TÜV Nord-Pune, India. Mr. Joshi, B.E. (Environmental
Engineering), is a TÜV-CERT Lead auditor for ISO 9001/14001 and OHSAS
18001. He has received extensive training in the CDM validation and verification
process. He is an appointed expert for TÜV NORD JI/CDM Certification Program.
- Swapnil Thanekar: He is CDM Analyst from TUV NORD-Pune. He is M.Tech.
(Heat Power), B.E. (Mechanical Engineering) and engaged with TÜV India
operation. He has participated in several verification and validations
9 of 21

The final verification report is verified by
- Mr. Rainer Winter. Mr. Winter works at TÜV NORD as ISO 9001/ 14001 Auditor
and environmental verifier for EMAS. He is also an approved emission verifier
within the European Emission Trading Scheme. Mr. Winter is an authorized
JI/CDM assessor and is in charge of the JI/CDM Certification Program of TÜV
NORD.
10 of 21

3. METHODOLOGY
The verification of the project was carried out in April - June 2007 after the contract
dated.
Preparations: From 2007-04-22 to 2007-05-01
On-site verification: 2007-05-02
(Draft) Reporting: 2007-05-20
(Final) Reporting: From 2007-05-21 to 2007-06-07
The verification consisted of the following steps:
• A desk review of the Monitoring Report /MR1/ /MR2/ , the emission reduction
calculation spreadsheet /XLS/ , and additional supporting documents which were
submitted by the client. A customised verification protocol /CPM/ according to
the Validation and Verification Manual /VVM/ was used to carry out risk based
assessment,
• On-Site assessment,
• Background investigation and follow-up interviews with personnel of the
project developer,
• Verification reporting (Draft Verification Report and Final Verification Report).
The criteria of this verification includes the relevant rules and steps of CDM (without
considering the public availability of the MR and the verification report) and the
contract conditions /CON/ .
Nonconformities raised during the verification can either be seen as a non-fulfilment
of criteria ensuring the proper implementation of a project or where a risk to deliver
high quality emission reductions is identified.
Corrective Action Requests (CARs) are issued, if:
• There is a clear deviation concerning to the above mentioned applicable
criteria (esp. the monitoring plan).
• requirements set by the monitoring plan or qualifications in the validation
opinion have not been met; or
• There is a risk that the project would not be able to deliver emission
reductions.
The verification team may also use the term Clarification Request (CR), which would
be issued if:
• Additional information is needed to fully clarify an issue.
The identified risks are reported in the form of CAR, CR and FAR in the Draft
Verification Report (DVR). Based on the closer or response provided against the
CAR and CR reported in the DVR and the revised MR, the Final Verification Report
(FVR) containing the verification opinion is issued.
11 of 21

4. VERIFICATION FINDINGS
In the following paragraphs the findings from the desk review of the monitoring
report /MR1/ , the PDD /PDD/ and other supporting documents, as well as from the onsite
assessment and the interviews are summarised.
The summary of CAR, FAR and CR issued are shown in Table 4-1:
Table 4-1: Summary of CAR and CR
Verification topic No. of CAR No. of FAR No. of CR
Remaining issues 0 0 0
Project implementation 1 0 0
Internal and external data 0 0 0
Environmental and social indicators 0 0 0
Management and operational system 0 1 1
Completeness of Monitoring 4 0 0
Accuracy of emission reduction calculations 0 0 0
Quality of Evidence to Determine Emission
Reductions
12 of 21
0 0 0
Management system and quality assurance 0 0 0
SUM 5 1 1

4.1. Summary of Findings and Conclusion
The findings of the Verification process are summarized in the table 4-1 below.
Table 4-1: Findings and conclusions of the verification
Topic #
Remaining issues,
CARs and CRs from
previous validation
-
Topic #
Project Implementation
CAR 1
Topic #
Internal and External
Data
-
Classification CAR FAR CR None
Findings -
Corrective Action -
Conclusion To be checked du-ring next periodic verification
Appropriate action was taken
MR was corrected correspondingly
Appropriate action was not taken
The project complies with the requirements
Classification CAR FAR CR None
Findings The monitoring plan is not addressing the unique
location of project activity e.g. state, district, taluka,
village, latitude and longitude where the project
activity is implemented
Corrective Action Revised monitoring is now properly amended and
addressing the unique location of project activity e.g.
state, district, taluka, village, latitude and longitude
where the project activity is implemented in
Conclusion
tabulated as well as map form.
To be checked du-ring next periodic verification
Appropriate action was taken
MR was corrected correspondingly
Appropriate action was not taken
The project complies with the requirements
Classification CAR FAR CR None
Findings -
Corrective Action -
Conclusion To be checked during next periodic verification
Appropriate action was taken
MR was corrected correspondingly
Appropriate action was not taken
The project complies with the requirements
13 of 21

Topic #
Environmental and
Social Indicators
-
Topic #
Management and operational
system
CR 1
Topic #
Completeness of Monitoring
CAR 2
Classification CAR FAR CR None
Findings -
Corrective Action -
Conclusion To be checked during next periodic verification
Appropriate action was taken
MR was corrected correspondingly
Appropriate action was not taken
The project complies with the requirements
Classification CAR FAR CR None
Findings Project proponent are requested to submit O & M
contact for each site to the validation team to assess
the management and operational system
Corrective Action Project proponent has submitted the contract for
operating the wind mill between project proponent
and wind mill operational company for all sites.
Conclusion To be checked during next periodic verification
Appropriate action was taken
MR was corrected correspondingly
Appropriate action was not taken
The project complies with the requirements
Classification CAR FAR CR None
Findings The considered crediting period mentioned in
monitoring report is 12/07/2001 to 11/07/2008.
However the defined crediting period is not
applicable during this verification stage and
appropriate changes should be made while revising
the monitoring report.
Corrective Action crediting period is now corrected in revised
Conclusion
monitoring report as 2001-07-12 to 2006-12-31
To be checked during next periodic verification
Appropriate action was taken
MR was corrected correspondingly
Appropriate action was not taken
The project complies with the requirements
14 of 21

Topic #
Completeness of Monitoring
CAR 3
Topic #
Completeness of Monitoring
CAR 4
Classification CAR FAR CR None
Findings In section 2 the period for project activity has been
written as 12/07/2001 to 31/12/2006.
Corrective Action The monitoring period has now been corrected in
section 2 of the monitoring report as 2001-07-12 to
2006-12-31.
Conclusion To be checked during next periodic verification
Appropriate action was taken
MR was corrected correspondingly
Appropriate action was not taken
The project complies with the requirements
Classification CAR FAR CR None
Findings Under executive summary of verification report the
electricity generated by project activity for the
crediting period (2001-07-12 to 2006-12-31) is
mentioned 107.24 GWh. However during the data
assessment by verification team, material
Corrective Action
misstatement was observed and needs appropriate
corrections.
The revised monitoring report has now been
corrected and the electricity generated by project
activity for the crediting period (2001-07-12 to 2006-
12-31) is 104.99 GWh.
Conclusion To be checked during next periodic verification
Appropriate action was taken
MR was corrected correspondingly
Appropriate action was not taken
The project complies with the requirements
15 of 21

Completeness of Monitoring
Topic #
Quality of Evidence
-
Topic #
Management System
and Quality Assurance
Management and
operational system
CAR 5
-
FAR 1
Classification CAR FAR CR None
Findings Baseline information with source applicable to the
project activity should be address in the monitoring
report
Corrective Action Under section 8 of revised monitoring report, the
relevant baseline information with source applicable
to the project activity is now appropriately
Conclusion
addressed.
To be checked during next periodic verification
Appropriate action was taken
MR was corrected correspondingly
Appropriate action was not taken
The project complies with the requirements
Classification CAR FAR CR None
Findings -
Corrective Action -
Conclusion To be checked during next periodic verification
Appropriate action was taken
MR was corrected correspondingly
Appropriate action was not taken
The project complies with the requirements
Classification CAR FAR CR None
Findings -
Corrective Action -
Conclusion To be checked during next periodic verification
Appropriate action was taken
MR was corrected correspondingly
Appropriate action was not taken
The project complies with the requirements
Classification CAR FAR CR None
Findings
Corrective Action
Monitoring and calibration procedures (QA/QC
management system) and programs have to be
formalised and followed
Conclusion To be checked during next periodic verification
Appropriate action was taken
MR was corrected correspondingly
Appropriate action was not taken
The project complies with the requirements
The closure of the all the CARs and CRs issued above resulted in net ER of 99075
tCO2eq for the period of 2001-07-12 to 2006-12-31.
16 of 21

The vintage wise break-up of verified ER is as follows:
Period Verified ER in tCO2eq
12/07/2001- 31/12/2001 846
01/01/2002- 31/12/2002 11983
01/01/2003- 31/12/2003 15848
01/01/2004- 31/12/2004 21704
01/01/2005- 31/12/2005 19629
01/01/2006- 31/12/2006 29066
Total 99075
17 of 21

5. VERIFICATION STATEMENT
Project Title “18.86 MW Bundled Wind Power Project, India”
Name of Project Participant As per section 1.3 of this report
UNFCCC Ref No.
Registered PDD and
Approved CDM
Methodology
used for Verification
Scope of Verification
NA
ACM0002: “Consolidated baseline methodology for grid-connected electricity
generation from renewable sources” (Version 06 date. 19/05/2006)
This scope of this engagement covers the verification and certification of voluntary
greenhouse gas emission reductions generated by the above mentioned project
covering 2001-07-12 to 2006-12-31.
Verification Opinion The verification is based on the revised monitoring report (June 2007 Version 01),
the monitoring plan as set out in the validated PDD, the validation report, emission
reduction calculation spreadsheet and supporting documents made available to the
TÜV NORD JI/CDM CP by the project participant.
As a result of the verification, the verifier confirms that:
• All operations of the project are implemented and installed as planned and
described in the validated project design document.
• The installed equipment essential for generating emission reductions runs
reliable and is calibrated appropriately.
• The monitoring system is in place and functional. The project is ready to
generate GHG emission reductions.
As the result of the verification, the verifier confirms that the GHG emission reductions
are calculated without material misstatements in a conservative and appropriate
manner. TÜV NORD JI/CDM CP herewith confirms that the project has achieved
emission reductions in the above mentioned reporting period as below:
Mumbai, 2007-06-07
Baseline Emissions 99075 t CO2eq
Leakage 000 t CO2eq
Project Emissions 000 t CO2eq
Total Emission Reduction
Verified
Asim K. Jana
TÜV NORD JI/CDM Certification Program
Verification Team Leader
18 of 21
99075 t CO2eq

6. REFERENCES
Table 6-1: Documents provided by the project proponent
Reference Document
/CAL/ Calibration Certificate of energy meter, by Karnataka power transmission
corporation limited for M/s GEM CRAFT wind project on dated 02/01/2007
/CC/ Commissioning certificated by Karnataka power transmission corporation
limited for M/s GEM CRAFT wind project on dated 01/04/2006
/CON/ The signed contract between TUV NORD and South Pole Carbon Asset
Management for carrying out verification of voluntary emission reduction.
/JMR/ Monthly Electricity certificate by State Electricity Boards: Joint Meter Reading
between Karnataka power transmission corporation limited and M/s GEM
CRAFT form May 2006 to April 2007
/MR1/ Monitoring Report “18.86 MW Bundled Wind Power Project, India”, draft
version (0) on dated 25.05.2007
/MR2/ Monitoring Report “18.86 MW Bundled Wind Power Project, India” for the
period 2001-07-12 to 2006-12-31, revised version (1) on dated. 04.06.2007.
/OM/ Contract for operating the wind mill between Enercon (India) and M/s GEM
CRAFT enterprises private limited on dated 20/06/2005
/PPA/ Power Purchase Agreement between Bangalore electricity supply company
limited and M/s GEM CRAFT enterprises private limited on dated 21/04/2006
/XLS/ Excel – Calculation sheets (baseline and emission reduction calculation )
provided by the project participant
Table 6-2: Background investigation and assessment documents
Reference Document
/ACM 0002/ Consolidated methodology for grid-connected electricity generation from
renewable sources (version 06: 19 May 2006)
/CEA/ CO2 Baseline Database for the Indian Power Sector, December 2006,
published by Central Electricity Authority, Ministry of Power, Government of
India
19 of 21

Reference Document
/DVR/ Draft Verification Report for the CDM project: “18.86 MW Bundled Wind
Power Project, India” for the period of for the period 2001-07-12 to 2006-12-
31.
/KP/ Kyoto Protocol (1997)
/MA/ Decision 17/CP.7 (Marrakech Accords):
/SMP/ Simplified modalities and procedures for small- scale CDM project activities
(Annex II to decision 21/CP.8)
/PDD/ Project Design Document for “18.86 MW Bundled Wind Power Project, India”
dated 10/04/2007.
/VAL/ Validation Report for VER project for “18.86 MW Bundled Wind Power
Project, India” issued by TUV Nord, Report number 53700307-07/XX dated
29/05/2007.
/VVM/ IETA, PCF Validation and Verification Manual (V. 4)
/VCS/ The Voluntary Carbon Standard (V. 1)
Table 6-3: Websites used
Reference Link Organisation
/cea/ www.cea.nic.in
20 of 21
Central Electricity Authority
/dna-i/ www.envfor.nic.in/cdm The National Clean Development
Mechanism (CDM) Authority
/imef/ www.envfor.nic.in Indian Ministry of Environment and Forest
/imp/ www.powermin.nic.in Indian Ministry of Power
/ipcc/ www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp IPCC publications
/UNFCC/ http://cdm.unfccc.int UNFCCC
/ieta/ http : //www.ieta.org/
Website of International Emission trading
Association (IETA)
/MoP/ http : //www.powermin.nic.in/ Website of Ministry of Power, Government
of India
/cma/ http://www.natcomindia.org/dat
asources.htm
Natcom India, Ministry of Environnement
and Forest, Government of India.

Reference Link Organisation
/appcb/ http://www.appcb.org/ Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board
/GHG/ http://www.ghgprotocol.org/tem
plates/GHG5/layout.asp?MenuI
D=849
Table 6-4: Interviewed Persons
21 of 21
World Business Council for Sustainable
Development
Reference MoI1 Name Organisation / Function
/IM01/ V Mr.
Ms
/IM01/ V Mr.
Ms
/IM02/ V Mr.
Ms.
/IM03/ V Dr.
Mr.
Ms.
/IM03/ V Mr.
Ms.
/IM03/ V Mr.
Ms.
/IM03/ V Mr.
Ms.
/IM03/ V Mr.
Ms.
/IM03/ V Mr.
Ms.
/IM03/ V Mr.
Ms.
Patrick Burgi South Pole Carbon Asset
Management
Camerata Thomas South Pole Carbon Asset
Management
Deepak Zade Exec. Vice President, M/S
Mitcon Consultancy
Services Ltd.
Bhushan Pachpande Consultant, M/S MITCON
Consultancy Services Ltd.
Dipak Patil Consultant, M/S MITCON
Consultancy Services Ltd.
Avadoot Marathe MSEB Licensing - SUZLON
Nandakumar Satre Section Head - SUZLON
D.S Mane DPR Operator - SUZLON
Babasaheb Dangat Mech. Engg. -SUZLON
Rahul Ghadge Store Incharge - SUZLON