Cogency v2 n2
Cogency v2 n2
Cogency v2 n2
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
COGENCY Vol. 2, N0. 2 (149-153), Spring 2010 ISSN 0718-8285<br />
Frans H. van Eemeren (ed.). Examining Argumentation in<br />
Context: Fifteen studies on strategic maneuvering. Amsterdam:<br />
John Benjamins Publishing, 2009, 305 pp., (hb.), ISBN 9789027211187,<br />
EUR 95.00.<br />
Janice Schuetz<br />
Department of Communication and Journalism,<br />
University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.<br />
jschuetz@unm.edu<br />
Received: 4-5-2010 Accepted: 7-10-2010<br />
Argumentation theorists will welcome Frans H. van Eemeren’s collection of<br />
fifteen essays on strategic maneuvering, dedicated to Peter Houtlosser with<br />
whom the editor worked for a decade to develop the theory as an extension<br />
of pragma dialectics. This collection brings together European and North<br />
American scholars whose work on strategic maneuvering enhances both its<br />
breadth of applications and its depth potential for argumentation analysis.<br />
The contents of this edited volume certify that the evolving theory of strategic<br />
maneuvering evokes interest from scholars of informal logic, rhetoric,<br />
linguistics, politics, law, and marketing. My review highlights the content of<br />
a few of these essays in order to identify promising new directions for this<br />
theory.<br />
Chapter 1 explicates the main concepts and principles of strategic maneuvering<br />
drawn from several previously published essays by van Eemeren<br />
and Houtlosser. The essay evolves sequentially showing how the elements<br />
of this theory developed over time. (1) Grounded in pragma dialectics, the<br />
goal of the theory is to integrate the “artful effectiveness” of rhetoric with<br />
the “critical reasonableness” of dialectics. (2) The chapter explains how the<br />
topical potential, audience directed adjustments, and rhetorical stylistics<br />
intersect within an argumentative discourse during the confrontation, open-<br />
149