Cogency v2 n2

More documents

Recommendations

Info

COGENCY Vol. 2, N0. 2, Spring 2010 Ellis, A. “Kenny and the Continuity of Wittgenstein’s Philosophy.” Mind 87 (346) (1978): 270-275. Fleming, D. “Can Pictures Be Arguments?” Argumentation and Advocacy 33 (1) (1996): 11-22 Fodor, J. The Language of Thought. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press, 1975. Gill, J. “Wittgenstein and Metaphor.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 40 (2) (1979): 272-284. Jastrow, J. “Duck-Rabbit Illusion” 1899. Online image. 18 February 2010. http:// commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Duck-Rabbit_illusion.jpg Johnson, R. “Why Visual Arguments Aren’t Arguments.” In J. A. Blair, H. V. Hansen, R. H. Johnson and C. W. Tindale (Eds.), Informal Logic at 25, Proceedings of the 25 th Anniversary Conference, CD ROM, 2003. Koethe, J. The Continuity of Wittgenstein’s Thought. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996. Kress, G. and T. van Leewen. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge, 1996. Munson S.J. and N. Thomas. “Wittgenstein’s Phenomenology.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 23 (1) (1962): 37-50. Plato, The Meno, in Five Dialogues. Trans. G.M.A. Grube. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing, 2002. Roque, G. “What is Visual in Visual Argumentation.” Proceedings of the Eighth OSSA Conference. University of Windsor. CD-ROM, 2009 (forthcoming). Seligman, D. “Wittgenstein on Seeing Aspects and Experiencing Meanings.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 37 (2) (1976): 205-217. Slade, C. “Seeing Reasons: Visual Argumentation in Advertising.” Argumentation 17 (2003): 145-160. Smith, V. “Aristotle’s Classical Enthymeme and the Visual Argumentation of the Twenty-first Century.” Argumentation and Advocacy 43 (3-4) (2007): 114-123. van Peursen, C. A. “Edmund Husserl and Ludwig Wittgenstein.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 20 (2) (1959): 187-191. Walton, D., C. Reed, and F. Macagno. Argumentation Schemes. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008. Wittgenstein, L. The Blue and Brown Books. Trans. and Ed. Rush Rhees. New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1960. Wittgenstein, L. Philosophical Investigations. Trans. G.E.M. Anscombe. New York: MacMillan, 1968. 134
Book Reviews COGENCY Vol. 2, N0. 2 (135-148), Spring 2010 ISSN 0718-8285 Lawrence S. Cunningham (ed.), Intractable Disputes about the Natural Law: Alasdair MacIntyre and Critics. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2009, 374 pp. ISBN 978-0-268-12300- 3, $ 30 (pbk). Calvin Hayes Faculty of Business, Brock University, St. Catharines Ont., Canada. chayes@brocku.ca Received: 11-6-2010 Accepted: 22-11-2010 1. Introduction Readers of a journal devoted to reasoning and argumentation should find a book discussing Alasdair McIntyre’s theories on moral reasoning and arguments very interesting. For over 30 years MacIntyre has been developing a sophisticated yet controversial theory of moral reasoning and argument. It is based on a combination of Aristotle, Thomism and post-modern critiques of liberal individualism and of the secular, moral theories undergirding it. In his many writings over that period, he primarily addresses secular philosophers and social scientists interested in these matters. In this book, he addresses his fellow Catholic scholars but includes updated critiques of the major Western secular moral philosophies of the Enlightenment and modernity: Utilitarianism, Kantianism and Social Contract theories. The main difference between this book and his writings from the 1980s (1984, 1988) is that he now seems open to including natural rights under the medieval Catholic theory of natural law. The book resulted from a request from Cardinal Ratzinger 1 that the University of Notre Dame study the complex is- 1 Cardinal Ratzinger is now Pope Benedict XVI (as I suspect most, if not all, readers of this journal know). Since almost all the contributors, including MacIntyre, refer to him by 135
Page 1 and 2:
ISSN 0718-8285 COGENCY Journal of R
Page 3 and 4:
ISSN 0718-8285 COGENCY Journal of R
Page 5 and 6:
COGENCY Journal of Reasoning and Ar
Page 7 and 8:
COGENCY Vol. 2, N0. 2 (7-15), Sprin
Page 9 and 10:
Editorial: Ludwig Wittgenstein… a
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Articles COGENCY Vol. 2, N0. 2 (17-
Page 19 and 20:
COGENCY Vol. 2, N0. 2 (19-39), Spri
Page 21 and 22:
You can’t step into the same Argu
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
COGENCY Vol. 2, N0. 2 (41-80), Spri
Page 43 and 44:
Wittgenstein and the Logic of Deep
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
COGENCY Vol. 2, N0. 2 (81-104), Spr
Page 83 and 84: Wittgenstein’s influence on the d
Page 105 and 106: COGENCY Vol. 2, N0. 2 (105-134), Sp
Page 107 and 108: “A picture held us Captive”: Th
Page 133: “A picture held us Captive”: Th
Page 137 and 138: Lawrence S. Cunningham (Ed.), Intra
Page 151 and 152: Frans H. van Eemeren (ed.). Examini
Page 153 and 154: Frans H. van Eemeren (ed.). Examini
Page 157 and 158: David Hitchcock and Bart Verheij (e
Page 181 and 182: Dialogue-in-process. Review of Fran
Page 183 and 184: Dialogue-in-process. Review of Fran
Page 185 and 186:
Dialogue-in-process. Review of Fran
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
COGENCY Journal of Reasoning and Ar
Page 195 and 196:
Instructions for authors to 24 mont
Page 197 and 198:
Cogency Vol. 2, No.2 was printed in
show all

Cogency v2 n2

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?