Download PDF - 208 kb

More documents

Recommendations

Info

2. The Case Law Khagen (cont.) • The court held that there was insufficient evidence as to the standard of support that should have been provided, and found no evidence that the lack of support caused the business’ failure. • The plaintiff franchisee also split his time between the franchise and another business venture, and the court found that the franchisee did nothing to assist himself in ensuring the donut shop was successful.
2. The Case Law Other Cases: • Gerami v. Double Double Pizza Chicken Ltd. . (2005, Ontario) • Print Three Franchising Corp. v. McLennan Printing Inc. . (2001, Manitoba) • Bagai v. Sure Corp. (2000, Alberta) • Allegra of North America Inc. v. Stevens (2008, B.C.) • Zippy Print Enterprises Ltd. v. Pawliuk (1994, B.C.)
Page 1 and 2: LEAN ON ME?: A FRANCHISOR’S S OBL
Page 3 and 4: 1. How Does The Duty To Support Ari
Page 11 and 12: 2. The Case Law Machias v. Mr Subm
Page 13 and 14: 2. The Case Law On the other hand.
Page 15: 2. The Case Law Khagen Investments
Page 19 and 20: 3. Hypotheticals The franchisor off
Page 21 and 22: 3. Hypotheticals At all relevant ti
Page 23 and 24: 4. Best Practices Operations Manua
Page 25: 5. Questions and Answers

Download PDF - 208 kb

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?