23.03.2015 Views

Supplemental IE Report RSAI Sun & Marine - Royal and Sun Alliance

Supplemental IE Report RSAI Sun & Marine - Royal and Sun Alliance

Supplemental IE Report RSAI Sun & Marine - Royal and Sun Alliance

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Milliman Client <strong>Report</strong><br />

7.11 My views, as set out in the <strong>Report</strong> for the MIC Scheme <strong>and</strong> the <strong>Report</strong> for the PAGI Schemes, were in summary that:<br />

• Prior to the Effective Date, the policyholders of <strong>Marine</strong> enjoy a strong level of security, which in turn is bound<br />

together with <strong>RSAI</strong> by the DMG;<br />

• On <strong>and</strong> after the Effective Date, the Schemes (in conjunction with the post-transfers reinsurance<br />

arrangements with <strong>RSAI</strong>) <strong>and</strong> the PAGI Schemes will not adversely affect to any material extent the security<br />

of the exiting policyholders of <strong>Marine</strong> or the policyholders (including PAGI policyholders) transferring to<br />

<strong>Marine</strong>; <strong>and</strong><br />

• The post-transfers (re)insurance arrangements with <strong>RSAI</strong> covering the portfolios of <strong>Marine</strong>, <strong>Sun</strong> <strong>and</strong> RSA Re<br />

will have no material impact on <strong>RSAI</strong>’s overall risk exposure, <strong>and</strong> hence policyholder security <strong>and</strong> service<br />

levels for PAGI, <strong>Marine</strong>, <strong>RSAI</strong>, <strong>Sun</strong> <strong>and</strong> RSA Re.<br />

7.12 I am informed by <strong>RSAI</strong> that the claim made by Blue Seas is being h<strong>and</strong>led in the usual way <strong>and</strong> in accordance with<br />

<strong>RSAI</strong>/<strong>Marine</strong> protocols (which are intended to be TCF compliant). Further, I am informed that there is a substantial<br />

amount of information still outst<strong>and</strong>ing from the claimant before <strong>Marine</strong> can proceed to an Examination under Oath of<br />

the claimant <strong>and</strong> other relevant parties.<br />

7.13 I have updated my analysis of the Schemes as described in this <strong>Supplemental</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, <strong>and</strong> that for the PAGI<br />

Schemes as described in my supplemental report for the PAGI Schemes. Based on my updated analyses I continue<br />

to believe that the Schemes (<strong>and</strong> the PAGI Schemes) will not have a materially adverse impact on the security<br />

provided to <strong>Marine</strong>'s existing policyholders <strong>and</strong> policyholders transferring to <strong>Marine</strong>; <strong>and</strong> that the proposed Schemes<br />

(<strong>and</strong> the PAGI Schemes) will not have a materially adverse impact on <strong>Marine</strong>'s existing policyholders <strong>and</strong><br />

policyholders transferring to <strong>Marine</strong> in relation to the way their policies are managed <strong>and</strong> administered, relative to their<br />

position prior to the Schemes (<strong>and</strong> the PAGI Schemes) being implemented.<br />

7.14 I am not aware of any other policyholder concerns that I need to address at the date of this <strong>Supplemental</strong> <strong>Report</strong>.<br />

<strong>Supplemental</strong> <strong>Report</strong> of the Independent Expert 16<br />

November 30, 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!