23.03.2015 Views

Supplemental IE Report RSAI Sun & Marine - Royal and Sun Alliance

Supplemental IE Report RSAI Sun & Marine - Royal and Sun Alliance

Supplemental IE Report RSAI Sun & Marine - Royal and Sun Alliance

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Milliman Client <strong>Report</strong><br />

7. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS<br />

ILU GUARANTEE<br />

7.1 Under the Schemes, the transferring business includes some insurance business originally written through the<br />

Institute of London Underwriters ("ILU"). Such business enjoys the benefit of guarantees in relation to the payment of<br />

claims. These guarantees are provided by companies in the RSA Group, <strong>and</strong> in some cases by PAGI.<br />

7.2 Subsequent to the <strong>Report</strong>s, <strong>RSAI</strong> has held discussions with representatives of the ILU regarding arrangements<br />

between members of the RSA Group <strong>and</strong> the ILU in relation to the insurance business transferring in connection with<br />

the Schemes. The outcome of those discussions is that a replacement guarantee is to be given in relation to the<br />

relevant transferring policies following their transfer to <strong>Marine</strong> (I am informed by <strong>RSAI</strong> that all the relevant business<br />

will be transferred to <strong>Marine</strong> under the MIC Scheme <strong>and</strong> PAGI (marine business) Scheme) <strong>and</strong> that the new<br />

guarantor will be <strong>RSAI</strong>.<br />

7.3<br />

I have obtained independent legal advice that this new guarantee is a satisfactory replacement to the original<br />

guarantees. Where the guarantee is currently provided by a company in the RSA Group, that company currently relies<br />

on <strong>RSAI</strong> to provide its ultimate security through the DMG <strong>and</strong> so the security provided is essentially unchanged.<br />

Where the guarantee has been provided by PAGI, although PAGI is an external company not party to the DMG, it is<br />

wholly reinsured by <strong>RSAI</strong> <strong>and</strong> in the circumstances that the guarantee would be called upon would in all likelihood be<br />

unable to provide support. The replacement ILU guarantee, to come into force from the Effective Date, will remove<br />

this consideration as <strong>RSAI</strong> will be the only guarantor.<br />

7.4 Therefore, in my view, transferring policyholders with policies written through the ILU will enjoy essentially the same<br />

benefit both pre <strong>and</strong> post the proposed transfers.<br />

PAGI SET-OFF RIGHTS<br />

7.5 I am informed by <strong>RSAI</strong> that through the terms of the sale of the RSA Group UK life business (completed on 30<br />

September 2004) whereby PAGI left the RSA Group, a financial true-up <strong>and</strong> final settlement took place 30 days after<br />

completion, upon which it was agreed by the contracting parties that, as soon as practical after completion of that sale<br />

<strong>and</strong> in any event within 12 months thereafter (30 September 2005), all rights of or against any Phoenix Group<br />

Company (involving PAGI) or Member of the RSA Group respectively would be waived<br />

7.6 In consequence, <strong>RSAI</strong> regards any rights, such as set off rights, which may have been in place as at 30 September<br />

2004 (the completion date) to have fallen away from 30 September 2005 at the very latest.<br />

7.7 It follows therefore that <strong>RSAI</strong> believes that no PAGI set off rights against any RSA Group company remain in place at<br />

the date of this <strong>Supplemental</strong> <strong>Report</strong>, <strong>and</strong> in my view this conclusion is reasonable.<br />

POLICYHOLDER CONCERNS<br />

7.8 I have been informed by <strong>RSAI</strong> that Ms Mayda Balboa, a managing/sole member of Blue Seas Holding LLC ("Blue<br />

Seas") has expressed concerns relating to the Schemes <strong>and</strong> the PAGI Schemes. These concerns relate to the MIC<br />

Scheme <strong>and</strong> the PAGI (marine business) Scheme <strong>and</strong> are based, primarily, on the level of secur ity provided to<br />

<strong>Marine</strong>'s existing policyholders <strong>and</strong> policyholders transferring to <strong>Marine</strong> under the MIC Scheme <strong>and</strong> the PAGI (marine<br />

business) Scheme. In particular, it is alleged that if the MIC Scheme <strong>and</strong> the PAGI (marine business) Scheme are<br />

sanctioned by the Court, <strong>Marine</strong> is at risk of insolvency for the following reasons:<br />

• The <strong>Report</strong>s <strong>and</strong> the PAGI <strong>Report</strong> are inaccurate as the information on which they are based comes directly<br />

from <strong>RSAI</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>RSAI</strong> “did not outline the major risks that are developing on a daily event that will seriously<br />

affect [<strong>Marine</strong>’s] liquidity to settle outst<strong>and</strong>ing claims [sic]”; <strong>and</strong><br />

• <strong>Marine</strong> “is a defendant in a $640 million dollar breech of agreement for failing to settle on an All Risk Policy<br />

that they were a part of [sic]…”, <strong>and</strong> it has “other high financial liabilities of unsettled claims”.<br />

7.9 I can confirm that <strong>RSAI</strong> has supplied me with all the relevant <strong>and</strong> requested information relating to <strong>Marine</strong> in order for<br />

me to reach the conclusions in the <strong>Report</strong>s <strong>and</strong> the PAGI <strong>Report</strong>.<br />

7.10 I am informed that <strong>RSAI</strong>/<strong>Marine</strong> has no knowledge of a $640 million breach of agreement.<br />

<strong>Supplemental</strong> <strong>Report</strong> of the Independent Expert 15<br />

November 30, 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!