Eukaryotic Picoplankton in Surface Oceans - incommet

Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2011.65:91-110. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org
by CSIC - Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas on 09/27/11. For personal use only.
86. Comparative
genomic analysis of four
related picoeukaryote
strains that reveals their
gene content, genome
organization, and
potential ecological
adaptations.
83. Vila-Costa M, Simó R, Harada H, Gasol JM, Slezak D, Kiene RP. 2006. Dimethylsulfoniopropionate
uptake by marine phytoplankton. Science 314:652–54
84. Vørs N, Buck KR, Chavez FP, Eikrem W, Hansen LE, et al. 1995. Nanoplankton of the equatorial Pacific
with emphasis on the heterotrophic protists. Deep-Sea Res. II 42:585–602
85. Wikner J, Hagström Å. 1988. Evidence for a tightly coupled nanoplanktonic predator-prey link regulating
the bacterivores in the marine environment. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 50:137–45
86. Worden AZ, Lee J-H, Mock T, Rouzé P, Simmons MP, et al. 2009. Green evolution and dynamic
adaptations revealed by genomes of the marine picoeukaryotes Micromonas. Science 324:268–72
87. Worden AZ, Nolan JK, Palenik B. 2004. Assessing the dynamics and ecology of marine picophytoplankton:
the importance of the eukaryotic component. Limnol. Oceanogr. 49:168–79
88. Worden AZ, Not F. 2008. Ecology and diversity of picoeukaryotes. In Microbial Ecology of the Oceans,
Second Edition, ed. DL Kirchman, pp. 159–196. New York: Wiley
89. Zubkov MV, Tarran GA. 2008. High bacterivory by the smallest phytoplankton in the North Atlantic
Ocean. Nature 455:224–27
110 Massana