Application of biochar in rice productivity and nitrogen run-off control
Application of biochar in rice productivity and nitrogen run-off control Application of biochar in rice productivity and nitrogen run-off control
International Workshop on Production and Application of Biochar in China’s Agriculture Application of biochar in rice productivity and nitrogen run-off control Weixiang Wu, Min Yang, Yuxue Liu, Da Dong, Qibo Feng, Minmin Zhou College of Environment and Resource Science, Zhejiang University E-mail: weixiang@zju.edu.cn Sept, 2011
- Page 2 and 3: Current situation of soil quality i
- Page 4 and 5: Run-off nitrogen fertilizer & water
- Page 6 and 7: Biochar Temperature residence tim
- Page 8 and 9: Facility for producing biochar and
- Page 10 and 11: Rice straw biochar 600 500 Temperat
- Page 12 and 13: Slow release fertilizers 1# 2# 3# 4
- Page 14 and 15: Physiochemical property of bamboo a
- Page 16 and 17: Stability of rice straw biochar Mic
- Page 18 and 19: Effect of biochar amendment on NH 4
- Page 20 and 21: Influence of biochar (SC and BC) am
- Page 22 and 23: 10 8 c c b CK BC SC CKU BCU SCU a a
- Page 24 and 25: Influence on concentration of NH 4
- Page 26 and 27: Conclusions Biochar might be used
- Page 28 and 29: 2 Mechanisms and technology develop
- Page 30: Acknowledgments: • National Natur
International Workshop on Production <strong>and</strong> <strong>Application</strong> <strong>of</strong> Biochar <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a’s Agriculture<br />
<strong>Application</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>biochar</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>rice</strong> <strong>productivity</strong><br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>nitrogen</strong> <strong>run</strong>-<strong>of</strong>f <strong>control</strong><br />
Weixiang Wu, M<strong>in</strong> Yang, Yuxue Liu, Da Dong, Qibo Feng, M<strong>in</strong>m<strong>in</strong> Zhou<br />
College <strong>of</strong> Environment <strong>and</strong> Resource Science,<br />
Zhejiang University<br />
E-mail: weixiang@zju.edu.cn<br />
Sept, 2011
Current situation <strong>of</strong> soil quality <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
Low organic matter content: average 1% <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
Large area <strong>of</strong> middle <strong>and</strong> low yield arable l<strong>and</strong><br />
Lack <strong>of</strong> nutrients<br />
Arable l<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> different yield <strong>in</strong> Zhejiang (2006)<br />
Intensive cropp<strong>in</strong>g system is one <strong>of</strong> the most important reasons.
2400<br />
5000<br />
2200<br />
2000<br />
1800<br />
1600<br />
1400<br />
1200<br />
N-fertilizer<br />
4800<br />
Produ. rate<br />
4600<br />
4400<br />
4200<br />
4000<br />
3800<br />
3600<br />
Year<br />
(Zhu & Chen, 2004)<br />
1985<br />
1986<br />
1987<br />
1988<br />
1989<br />
1990<br />
1991<br />
1992<br />
1993<br />
1994<br />
1995<br />
1996<br />
1997<br />
1998<br />
1999<br />
2000<br />
2001<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
2004<br />
2005<br />
2006<br />
2007<br />
Nitrogen fertilizer (10 4 ton)<br />
Production rate (kg/ha)<br />
Increas<strong>in</strong>g rate<br />
1000<br />
3400<br />
Decade<br />
1949– 1958<br />
1959– 1968<br />
1969– 1978<br />
1979– 1988<br />
1989– 1998<br />
1949– 1998<br />
Nitrogen fertilizer VS food production<br />
200<br />
180<br />
160<br />
140<br />
120<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
(Ch<strong>in</strong>a Statistical Yearbook, 2008)<br />
b Y=A+bX
Run-<strong>of</strong>f <strong>nitrogen</strong> fertilizer & water eutrophication<br />
Crop<br />
Sown area<br />
(×10 8 hm 2 )<br />
Consumption <strong>of</strong> chemical<br />
Fertilizer (kg/hm 2 )<br />
Amount <strong>of</strong> N <strong>run</strong>-<strong>of</strong>f<br />
(×10 4 t/a)<br />
Rice 3.06 300 77.69<br />
Vegetable 1.8 720 57.60<br />
Nitrogen <strong>run</strong>-<strong>of</strong>f rate from paddy field: 30-70%
A new technology ?<br />
Reduce <strong>nitrogen</strong> <strong>run</strong>-<strong>of</strong>f pollution<br />
Improve soil quality<br />
Increase crop yield<br />
Carbon sequestration
Biochar<br />
Temperature<br />
residence time<br />
oxygen<br />
feedstock<br />
Great porosity<br />
Large surface<br />
area<br />
High stability<br />
High capability<br />
<strong>of</strong> adsorption<br />
…<br />
Reta<strong>in</strong><br />
nutrients<br />
Reduce<br />
fertilizer used<br />
Improve soil<br />
<strong>productivity</strong><br />
…
Equipment for <strong>rice</strong> straw <strong>biochar</strong> production (small scale)<br />
Rice straw/bamboo<br />
Biochar
Facility for produc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>biochar</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>biochar</strong>-based slow release<br />
fertilizer<br />
Carbonization<br />
equipment<br />
Gr<strong>in</strong>der<br />
Waste gas treatment<br />
Control System<br />
Waste/heat<br />
recovery unit<br />
Conveyor<br />
Suction device<br />
Cutt<strong>in</strong>g Mach<strong>in</strong>e<br />
(Patent <strong>Application</strong> No: 201010514198.7)
70-100 kg/d <strong>of</strong> <strong>rice</strong> straw <strong>biochar</strong><br />
Rice straw production facilities <strong>in</strong> pilot scale
Rice straw <strong>biochar</strong><br />
600<br />
500<br />
Temperature ( ℃)<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
100<br />
0<br />
0 20 40 60 80<br />
Time (h)
Facility for produc<strong>in</strong>g slow release fertilizer<br />
Yield: 10-100 kg/h
Slow release fertilizers<br />
1# 2# 3#<br />
4# 5#<br />
Raw materials<br />
Common N fertilizers<br />
Rice straw <strong>biochar</strong><br />
Bentonite<br />
…<br />
(Patent <strong>Application</strong> No: 201110110405.7.)
Release rate <strong>of</strong> slow release fertilizer<br />
samples<br />
24h(%)<br />
7d(%)<br />
10d(%)<br />
14d(%)<br />
28d(%)<br />
1#<br />
87.59<br />
---<br />
---<br />
---<br />
---<br />
2#<br />
51.38<br />
63.58<br />
63.86<br />
---<br />
---<br />
3#<br />
15.05<br />
26.79<br />
27.64<br />
28.45<br />
63.66<br />
4#<br />
51.10<br />
67.88<br />
68.31<br />
---<br />
---<br />
5#<br />
14.88<br />
25.10<br />
26.04<br />
27.24<br />
60.88<br />
The 5# sample meets the Ch<strong>in</strong>a criterion that Release rate <strong>of</strong> slow release<br />
fertilizer < 15% <strong>in</strong> 24hrs <strong>and</strong>
Physiochemical property <strong>of</strong> bamboo <strong>and</strong> <strong>rice</strong> straw charcoal<br />
Pack<strong>in</strong>g density<br />
(g·cm -3 )<br />
pH<br />
CEC<br />
(cmol·kg -1 )<br />
BET SA<br />
(m 2·g-1 )<br />
Pore Volume<br />
(cm 3·g-1 )<br />
Bamboo<br />
char(BC)<br />
0.568<br />
9.81<br />
15.3<br />
182.6<br />
0.171<br />
Straw char(SC)<br />
0.125<br />
10.8<br />
23.9<br />
101.6<br />
0.070<br />
0.2<br />
0.18<br />
BC<br />
SC<br />
0.16<br />
D iffe r e n tia l P o r e V o lu m e (c m 3 g - 1 )<br />
0.14<br />
0.12<br />
0.1<br />
0.08<br />
0.06<br />
a<br />
b<br />
0.04<br />
0.02<br />
0<br />
2<br />
5<br />
2 0<br />
Pore Width (nm)<br />
5 0<br />
2 0 0<br />
3 0 0<br />
c<br />
d<br />
Pore size distribution curves <strong>of</strong> <strong>biochar</strong><br />
SEM photos <strong>of</strong> <strong>biochar</strong><br />
(a、b: bamboo char; c、d: c<br />
straw char )
Adsorption capacity <strong>of</strong> <strong>biochar</strong><br />
8<br />
7<br />
6<br />
BC<br />
SC<br />
q e (mg/g)<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
0 200 400 600 800 1000<br />
C e (mg/L)<br />
Equilibrium adsorption isotherm <strong>of</strong> NH + 4 -N N on bamboo <strong>and</strong> <strong>rice</strong> straw char<br />
Rice straw char exhibited a much higher adsorption capacity for<br />
NH 4+<br />
-N than bamboo char at 25℃.
Stability <strong>of</strong> <strong>rice</strong> straw <strong>biochar</strong><br />
Micrographs <strong>of</strong> <strong>biochar</strong> <strong>in</strong> ancient paddy soil
Evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>biochar</strong> amendment on <strong>nitrogen</strong><br />
retention <strong>and</strong> leach<strong>in</strong>g characteristic<br />
Bamboo charcoal: 0.5%<br />
N fertilizer: 400 kg N ha -1
Effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>biochar</strong> amendment on NH 4+<br />
-N concentration <strong>in</strong> the<br />
leachate <strong>of</strong> soil columns at different depth<br />
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
* *<br />
*<br />
1 0 cm 6 0<br />
2 0 cm<br />
C K<br />
N<br />
N B<br />
5 0<br />
4 0<br />
3 0<br />
*<br />
* *<br />
*<br />
NH4 + -N (mg L -1 )<br />
100<br />
50<br />
16<br />
14<br />
2 0<br />
1 0<br />
30 c m 1 8<br />
4 0 cm<br />
1 6<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
1 4<br />
1 2<br />
1 0<br />
4<br />
0 7 14 21 2 8 35 42 4 9 56 6 3 7 0<br />
8<br />
0 7 14 21 2 8 35 4 2 49 56 6 3 70<br />
Tim e (d )<br />
Addition <strong>of</strong> BC could significantly reduce NH 4+<br />
-N concentration <strong>in</strong> leachate from 10 cm depth<br />
with<strong>in</strong> the first 7 days. However, it was <strong>in</strong> reverse from 7 to 28 days dur<strong>in</strong>g the experiment.<br />
No significant difference <strong>in</strong> leachate NH 4+<br />
-N concentration was observed until day 49 at 20 cm<br />
depth.
Effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>biochar</strong> amendment on cumulative losses <strong>of</strong> NH 4+<br />
-N<br />
from soil columns at different depths<br />
100<br />
80<br />
CK<br />
N<br />
NB<br />
20<br />
10 cm 20 cm<br />
15<br />
*<br />
*<br />
NH 4<br />
+ -N (mg column<br />
-1 )<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
*<br />
10<br />
5<br />
30 cm<br />
10<br />
40 cm<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
4<br />
2<br />
2<br />
1 4 7 10 14 21 28 35 42 49 56 63 70<br />
Time (d)<br />
1 4 7 10 14 21 28 35 42 49 56 63 70<br />
<strong>Application</strong> <strong>of</strong> BC can reduce cumulative losses <strong>of</strong> NH 4+<br />
-N via leach<strong>in</strong>g by 15.2% at 20 cm<br />
with<strong>in</strong> 70 days observation.<br />
(Water Air Soil Pollut. 2010, 213:47–55.)
Influence <strong>of</strong> <strong>biochar</strong> (SC <strong>and</strong> BC) amendment on <strong>rice</strong><br />
<strong>productivity</strong><br />
Head<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Control<br />
Rice straw <strong>biochar</strong><br />
1%<br />
Maturity<br />
CK: <strong>control</strong>; BC: bamboo char; SC: <strong>rice</strong> straw char;<br />
CKU: urea; BCU: BC + urea; SCU: SC + urea;
CK<br />
BC<br />
SC<br />
CKU<br />
BCU<br />
SCU<br />
SRU<br />
CK BC SC CKU BCU SCU SRU<br />
Heitht (cm)<br />
120<br />
110<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
ab ab ab<br />
ab a<br />
bcc<br />
c<br />
c<br />
c<br />
cd<br />
d<br />
b<br />
bc b<br />
a<br />
bc<br />
ab<br />
cd c<br />
d<br />
bc<br />
a<br />
ab<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
a a a a a a a<br />
Seedl<strong>in</strong>g Boot<strong>in</strong>g Head<strong>in</strong>g Matur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Stages <strong>of</strong> <strong>rice</strong> development<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>rice</strong> straw <strong>biochar</strong> on <strong>rice</strong> height
10<br />
8<br />
c<br />
c<br />
b<br />
CK BC SC CKU BCU SCU<br />
a<br />
ab<br />
b ab<br />
bc<br />
c<br />
a<br />
abc abc<br />
Yield(t/ha)<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
2009 2010<br />
Time<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>biochar</strong> on <strong>rice</strong> yield over 2 years’ field experiment (experiment set <strong>in</strong> 2009)<br />
CK: <strong>control</strong>; BC: bamboo char; SC: <strong>rice</strong> straw char;<br />
CKU: urea; BCU: BC + urea; SCU: SC + urea;<br />
Average <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g rate: SC 19.8-21.6%(Compared to CK); SCU 11.1-14.4%<br />
(Compared to CKU).
Influence <strong>of</strong> <strong>rice</strong> straw <strong>biochar</strong> on <strong>nitrogen</strong> fertilizer<br />
<strong>in</strong>put reduction<br />
SC<br />
1%straw char + CK<br />
CK<br />
general amount <strong>of</strong> fertilizer<br />
SCL<br />
1%SC + 10% less <strong>of</strong> CK<br />
Second field experiment set <strong>in</strong> 2010
Influence on concentration <strong>of</strong> NH 4 + -N, NO 3 - -N <strong>in</strong> surface water<br />
NH4 + -N(mg/L)<br />
40.00<br />
35.00<br />
30.00<br />
25.00<br />
20.00<br />
15.00<br />
10.00<br />
5.00<br />
0.00<br />
* *<br />
CK BC SC SCL RS SRF1 SRF2<br />
Treatment<br />
2010-7-27 2010-9-5<br />
CK: general amount <strong>of</strong> fertilizer (180kg N/ha)<br />
BC: bamboo char(1%) + CK (180kg N/ha)<br />
SC: straw char (1%) + CK (180kg N/ha)<br />
SCL: straw char(1%) +less CK(162kg N/ha)<br />
RS: <strong>rice</strong> straw(1.3%) + CK (180kg N/ha)<br />
SRF1: charcoal coated slow released fertilizer1 (180kg N/ha)<br />
SRF2: charcoal coated slow released fertilizer2 (180kg N/ha)
13.5% 7.14% 15.1% 10.3%<br />
Gloss fresh Yield(t/ha)<br />
14.00<br />
12.00<br />
10.00<br />
8.00<br />
6.00<br />
4.00<br />
2.00<br />
0.00<br />
cd<br />
ab bc cd<br />
a d<br />
ab<br />
CK BC SC SCL RS SR1 SR2<br />
Treatment<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>biochar</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>biochar</strong>-based based slow released fertilizer on <strong>rice</strong><br />
yield (experiment set <strong>in</strong> 2010)
Conclusions<br />
Biochar might be used as an ideal amendment for<br />
retard<strong>in</strong>g vertical movement <strong>of</strong> NH 4+ -N <strong>and</strong> m<strong>in</strong>imiz<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the <strong>nitrogen</strong> loss through leach<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Biochar amendment <strong>in</strong> paddy field is able to<br />
significantly <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>rice</strong> <strong>productivity</strong> <strong>and</strong> reduce N<br />
fertilizer <strong>in</strong>put. Thus, it may prevent N fertilizer <strong>run</strong>-<strong>of</strong>f<br />
from paddy field.<br />
Rice straw <strong>biochar</strong>-based slow released fertilizer can<br />
not only <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>rice</strong> <strong>productivity</strong>, but also reduce N<br />
fertilizer <strong>run</strong>-<strong>of</strong>f from paddy field.<br />
Rice straw <strong>biochar</strong> with proper properties might be <strong>and</strong><br />
ideal material for improv<strong>in</strong>g low fertility paddy field.
Perspectives<br />
1<br />
Optimiz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>biochar</strong> ???<br />
Characteristics Function<br />
Soil-<strong>biochar</strong>-crop <strong>in</strong>teraction<br />
70<br />
1h 2h 3h 5h<br />
CEC(cmol/kg)<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
300 400 500 600 700<br />
Temperature(℃)<br />
1.0<br />
0.8<br />
300 400 500 600 700<br />
H/C<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
0.0<br />
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5<br />
O /C
2<br />
Mechanisms <strong>and</strong> technology development<br />
for N <strong>run</strong>-<strong>of</strong>f <strong>control</strong> <strong>in</strong> agriculture<br />
Biochar??<br />
http://www.google.com.hk/imgres<br />
www.google.com.hk/imgres?
3<br />
Risk Assessment?<br />
a<br />
b<br />
Biochar concentration<br />
Biochar concentration<br />
c<br />
d<br />
Comet assay<br />
Biochar concentration<br />
Biochar concentration<br />
Distributions <strong>and</strong> mean levels <strong>of</strong> DNA damage caused by <strong>biochar</strong>. (a) Tail<br />
length; (b) Tail moment; (C) Oliver tail moment; (d) Tail DNA (*: p
Acknowledgments:<br />
• National Natural Science Foundation <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a (NSFC)<br />
• Natural Science Foundation <strong>of</strong> Zhejiang Prov<strong>in</strong>ce<br />
• National Critical Project for Science <strong>and</strong> Technology on<br />
Water Pollution Prevention <strong>and</strong> Control<br />
Thanks for your attention!