21.03.2015 Views

Introduction to Fungi, Third Edition

Introduction to Fungi, Third Edition

Introduction to Fungi, Third Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DERMATEACEAE<br />

439<br />

Further, B. cinerea is known <strong>to</strong> produce laccase<br />

and other enzymes which can degrade or<br />

de<strong>to</strong>xify phy<strong>to</strong>alexins (Prins et al., 2000). ABC<br />

transporters capable of excluding phy<strong>to</strong>alexins<br />

from the hyphal cy<strong>to</strong>plasm have also been<br />

reported from B. cinerea (Schoonbeek et al., 2001;<br />

see also p. 278). Hence, Govrin and Levine (2000)<br />

have suggested that the hypersensitive response<br />

launched by the host actually facilitates, rather<br />

than represses, infection by B. cinerea.<br />

<strong>Fungi</strong>cide resistance<br />

Although biological control strategies against<br />

B. cinerea are being attempted, especially in the<br />

greenhouse and in post-harvest s<strong>to</strong>rage of certain<br />

fruit crops, control in agricultural situations<br />

relies chiefly on the application of fungicides.<br />

This is especially the case for the control of grey<br />

mould on grapevines. Botrytis cinerea has developed<br />

resistance against almost all fungicides in<br />

current use, and this may be due <strong>to</strong> several<br />

fac<strong>to</strong>rs, e.g. the occurrence of sexual reproduction<br />

in the field, the existence of at least two<br />

genetically distinct ‘species’, and the presence<br />

and spread of transposable genetic elements in<br />

one of them (Giraud et al., 1999). All of these<br />

fac<strong>to</strong>rs enhance the genetic diversity of populations<br />

of the pathogen, and thus the chances of<br />

development of fungicide resistance. Mechanisms<br />

of resistance of B. cinerea <strong>to</strong> fungicides<br />

have been discussed by Leroux et al. (2002) and<br />

seem <strong>to</strong> involve strategies also described from<br />

other fungi, i.e. reduced fungicide penetration<br />

in<strong>to</strong> or enhanced export from the hyphae by<br />

means of ABC transporters, enzyme-mediated<br />

de<strong>to</strong>xification and degradation of fungicides,<br />

and mutations leading <strong>to</strong> a reduced binding of<br />

the fungicide <strong>to</strong> its modified target protein.<br />

15.3 Dermateaceae<br />

This family (385 species) is almost certainly<br />

polyphyletic and it will take some time and<br />

numerous further name changes before the<br />

genera are circumscribed <strong>to</strong> the phylogeneticists’<br />

satisfaction. The species included here produce<br />

their apothecia directly on the substratum.<br />

Stromata are absent. The apothecia are small<br />

(less than 1 mm in diameter) and rather inconspicuous,<br />

being coloured in grey, brown or black<br />

<strong>to</strong>nes. The development of apothecia has been<br />

described by Gilles et al. (2001) for Pyrenopeziza<br />

brassicae (Fig. 15.7). Apothecia are formed from<br />

hyphae aggregating in<strong>to</strong> small globular structures<br />

resembling sclerotia or cleis<strong>to</strong>thecia. Later<br />

a pore develops at the apex (Fig. 15.7a), and this<br />

increases in diameter by lateral expansion of the<br />

basal disc (Fig. 15.7b) Meanwhile the asci mature<br />

in the hymenium. Ultimately, a flat apothecium<br />

is formed which possesses a clearly defined<br />

margin typical of the Dermateaceae (Fig. 15.7c).<br />

This developmental pattern has been termed<br />

hemiangiocarpic by Corner (1929). The anamorphs<br />

of Dermateaceae are variable. One very<br />

common form (Cadophora) is Phialophora-like,<br />

i.e. the phialides bear an apical collarette<br />

(Harring<strong>to</strong>n & McNew, 2003). Other forms do<br />

not have phialides, and instead long and transversely<br />

septate conidia are produced more or less<br />

directly from vegetative hyphae.<br />

One large genus (Mollisia) is chiefly saprotrophic<br />

and forms apothecia on dead leaves<br />

and fallen twigs, as exemplified by the ubiqui<strong>to</strong>us<br />

Mollisia cinerea which fruits on dead wood<br />

(Plate 7d). Other members of the family are<br />

hemibiotrophic plant pathogens causing limited<br />

lesions on agricultural crops. Pyrenopeziza<br />

brassicae (anamorph Cylindrosporium concentricum)<br />

causes light leaf spot on winter oilseed rape<br />

(Fig. 15.7) whereas Tapesia yallundae (anamorph<br />

Pseudocercospora herpotrichoides) is the cause of<br />

eyespot at the base of cereal stems, especially<br />

winter wheat, and its sister species, T. acuformis,<br />

causes a similar disease especially on rye. The<br />

conidial Rhynchosporium secalis is the agent of<br />

leaf blotch on a range of cereals. All of these<br />

pathogenic species are phylogenetically closely<br />

related (Goodwin, 2002).<br />

15.3.1 Tapesia yallundae and T. acuformis<br />

Apothecia have been found only recently for<br />

both Tapesia species (see Lucas et al., 2000) and<br />

Pyrenopeziza brassicae (see Gilles et al., 2001). They<br />

have not yet been found for Rhynchosporium<br />

secalis, although the high genetic diversity of<br />

field isolates of this species indicates that<br />

sexual reproduction should occur in nature

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!