21.03.2015 Views

Introduction to Fungi, Third Edition

Introduction to Fungi, Third Edition

Introduction to Fungi, Third Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

408 HYMENOASCOMYCETES: ERYSIPHALES<br />

distinguished from Phyllactinia by its rare chasmothecia<br />

bearing only mycelioid appendages<br />

and by its spear-shaped conidia (Oidiopsis<br />

anamorph).<br />

13.8 Controlofpowderymildew<br />

diseases<br />

Several different strategies are employed <strong>to</strong> control<br />

powdery mildew diseases in various crops,<br />

chemical control and breeding for resistance<br />

being by far the most important in commercial<br />

terms. We describe them here in detail because<br />

the fundamental principles apply <strong>to</strong> diseases<br />

caused by many other groups of fungi within<br />

the Eumycota, as mentioned elsewhere in this<br />

book.<br />

13.8.1 Breeding for resistance<br />

Wheat and barley were among the first crop<br />

plants for which resistance breeding programmes<br />

were initiated almost a century ago,<br />

following Biffen’s (1905) seminal work on the<br />

genetics of resistance <strong>to</strong> wheat stripe rust,<br />

Puccinia striiformis. Initial attempts at resistance<br />

breeding against B. graminis as well as other<br />

biotrophic plant pathogens used major gene<br />

resistance based on introducing single resistance<br />

genes in<strong>to</strong> the cultivar of choice. Numerous such<br />

major resistance genes originating from cereal<br />

cultivars as well as wild grasses related <strong>to</strong> wheat<br />

or barley are now available for breeding purposes<br />

(Hsam & Zeller, 2002). Breeding for major gene<br />

resistance has also been pursued in many other<br />

crops susceptible <strong>to</strong> powdery mildew diseases,<br />

such as melons and cucumbers (Podosphaera<br />

xanthii and Golovinomyces cichoracearum; Jahn<br />

et al., 2002), or clover (Erysiphe trifolii), hops<br />

(Sphaerotheca macularis) and gooseberries<br />

(Sphaerotheca mors-uvae) (see Smith et al., 1988).<br />

Breeding for resistance in slow-growing perennial<br />

crops such as apple or vines is obviously<br />

rather more difficult.<br />

Major gene resistance is usually based on<br />

a recognition mechanism involving the hypersensitive<br />

response (see pp. 397 398). The danger<br />

inherent in major gene resistance breeding is<br />

that the pathogen can overcome resistance by<br />

mutation of its corresponding avirulence allele<br />

<strong>to</strong> virulence. This is a frequent occurrence, e.g. in<br />

B. graminis. On the other hand, the frequency of<br />

virulence alleles in the field may decrease again<br />

in pathogen populations no longer exposed <strong>to</strong><br />

the cultivar and its resistance gene. Further, by<br />

co-ordinating the release of resistant cultivars,<br />

the effect of major gene resistance in crop<br />

protection can be maximized. For instance, the<br />

‘green bridge’ of B. graminis (see p. 399) can be<br />

broken if the summer and winter cereal cultivars<br />

sown in any one year carry different resistance<br />

genes. Further, it is possible <strong>to</strong> combine several<br />

resistance genes in one host variety, a process<br />

known as ‘pyramiding’. This requires the pathogen<br />

<strong>to</strong> develop multiple virulence alleles before<br />

it can infect such a crop variety (Hsam & Zeller,<br />

2002). The danger, of course, lies in the creation<br />

of multiply resistant ‘super-races’ of B. graminis<br />

or other powdery mildews.<br />

An interesting type of resistance in barley is<br />

mediated by the mlo allele which, as mentioned<br />

on p. 397, mediates the formation of very thick<br />

papillae, restricting infection by all races of<br />

B. graminis f. sp. hordei. This resistance is unusual<br />

for a broad-spectrum resistance in giving<br />

almost <strong>to</strong>tal control, and it is exceptional for<br />

a single-gene resistance in that it has remained<br />

stable in barley cultivars since it was<br />

introduced about 20 years ago (Jørgensen, 1994;<br />

Collins et al., 2002). In 1990, 30% of the spring<br />

barley acreage was sown with mlo resistant<br />

barley cultivars (Jørgensen, 1992). More<br />

commonly, broad-spectrum resistance is based<br />

on the combined effects of several minor genes<br />

and it is only partial, i.e. it retards infection<br />

and sporulation of the pathogen but does not<br />

al<strong>to</strong>gether prevent disease. It is sometimes<br />

termed horizontal resistance because it controls<br />

many different races of the pathogen <strong>to</strong> the<br />

same limited level, in contrast <strong>to</strong> vertical<br />

resistance mediated by major resistance genes<br />

in which individual races are controlled <strong>to</strong>tally,<br />

and others not at all. Although the molecular<br />

basis of most resistance genes is still unknown,<br />

it is noteworthy that some genes involved in<br />

horizontal resistance become more effective in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!