21.03.2015 Views

Introduction to Fungi, Third Edition

Introduction to Fungi, Third Edition

Introduction to Fungi, Third Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BLUMERIA GRAMINIS<br />

393<br />

of the Erysiphales. Affinities with Pyrenomycetes<br />

or Plec<strong>to</strong>mycetes have been proposed in the past<br />

but are not now thought <strong>to</strong> be true. Instead, the<br />

phylogenetic position of the Erysiphales is fairly<br />

isolated, possibly associated weakly with the<br />

Helotiales (Saenz & Taylor, 1999b).<br />

For many years, the taxonomy of genera<br />

and species was based on the system proposed<br />

by Léveillé (1851) who emphasized the features<br />

of the chasmothecium, especially the number of<br />

asci (one or several) and the type of appendage<br />

which may be simple, uncinate (¼ recurved or<br />

hooked), dicho<strong>to</strong>mously branched, or bulbous<br />

(see Fig. 13.1). Recent phylogenetic studies based<br />

on a variety of DNA sequences have revealed that<br />

in the Erysiphales, unlike most other groups of<br />

organisms, the features of asexual reproduction<br />

are more clearly diagnostic than those associated<br />

with sexual reproduction. There is a good correlation<br />

between the anamorphic state and the<br />

groupings obtained by DNA sequence analysis<br />

(Saenz & Taylor, 1999a), and the gross anamorphic<br />

features also correlate with the surface<br />

ornamentations of the conidia as seen by scanning<br />

electron microscopy (Fig. 13.3; Cook et al.,<br />

1997). Thus, the genera of Erysiphales are currently<br />

defined mainly by their anamorphs. In<br />

contrast, the striking chasmothecial appendages<br />

do not correspond well <strong>to</strong> the individual groups<br />

because notably the dicho<strong>to</strong>mous and simple<br />

mycelioid appendages are found in more than<br />

one taxon (Saenz & Taylor, 1999a). One casualty<br />

of these findings is the genus Sphaerotheca with<br />

simple appendages and one ascus per chasmothecium,<br />

which has been incorporated in<strong>to</strong> Podosphaera,<br />

formerly comprising only species with<br />

chasmothecia containing one ascus but bearing<br />

appendages with dicho<strong>to</strong>mously branched tips<br />

(Braun et al., 2002).<br />

We have encountered a great plasticity of<br />

appendages on ascocarps before, especially in the<br />

Plec<strong>to</strong>mycetes where they may be involved in<br />

insect dispersal (see p. 289). In contrast, in the<br />

Erysiphales the chasmothecial appendages seem<br />

<strong>to</strong> be related <strong>to</strong> the type of host infected.<br />

According <strong>to</strong> the analyses of Mori et al. (2000),<br />

the most basal species among the Erysiphales is<br />

Parauncinula septata which has uncinate (hooked)<br />

appendages. This species occurs on oak (Fagaceae),<br />

and Mori et al. (2000) have speculated that the<br />

Erysiphales originated on members of the Fagaceae<br />

because that host family hosts by far the<br />

greatest diversity of powdery mildews (Amano,<br />

1986; Braun, 1987, 1995). Together with another<br />

ancestral species possessing chasmothecia with<br />

uncinate appendages, Caespi<strong>to</strong>theca forestalis,<br />

P. septata may have diverged from other powdery<br />

mildews some 80 90 million years ago<br />

(Takamatsu et al., 2005).<br />

Many of the powdery mildews associated<br />

with the leaves of deciduous trees have hooked<br />

or branched appendages, whereas those on evergreen<br />

or herbaceous plants often have simple<br />

(mycelioid) appendages. It is known that complex<br />

appendages facilitate the attachment of chasmothecia<br />

<strong>to</strong> twigs or the bark of host trees for<br />

overwintering (see p. 407; Gadoury & Pearson,<br />

1988; Cortesi et al., 1995), and it must be advantageous<br />

for the primary inoculum in spring <strong>to</strong> be<br />

close <strong>to</strong> the budding leaves, rather than falling<br />

<strong>to</strong> the ground. Mori et al. (2000) proposed that no<br />

such selection pressure may hold for species parasitizing<br />

herbaceous plants, which might have<br />

permitted a reduction in the complexity of appendages<br />

<strong>to</strong> simple mycelioid ones. Such changes<br />

from woody <strong>to</strong> herbaceous hosts accompanied by<br />

the reduction in the complexity of appendages<br />

may have occurred several times independently<br />

within the Erysiphales (Takamatsu et al., 2000).<br />

13.3 Blumeria graminis<br />

Although Blumeria graminis is somewhat atypical<br />

of a powdery mildew in being a pathogen of<br />

grasses and cereals, we shall describe it in detail<br />

because more is known about it than any other<br />

member of the Erysiphales. Blumeria is separated<br />

from Erysiphe on several grounds. The haus<strong>to</strong>rium<br />

of B. graminis is digitate, i.e. it has striking<br />

finger-like projections (Fig. 13.2c), whereas the<br />

haus<strong>to</strong>ria are knob-like in most members of<br />

the Erysiphales. Upon closer inspection, they<br />

also have lobes, but these are tightly folded<br />

round the main haus<strong>to</strong>rial body, giving it a<br />

globose appearance (Bushnell & Gay, 1978).<br />

A second distinguishing feature of B. graminis

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!