21.03.2015 Views

Introduction to Fungi, Third Edition

Introduction to Fungi, Third Edition

Introduction to Fungi, Third Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ZYGOMYCETES: MUCORALES<br />

167<br />

species of Absidia may also infect domestic<br />

animals.<br />

A number of species have been used in the<br />

production of oriental foods such as sufu,<br />

tempeh and ragi (Nout & Aidoo, 2002) and<br />

some are used as starters in the saccharification<br />

of starchy materials before fermentation <strong>to</strong><br />

alcohol (Hesseltine, 1991). In modern biotechnology,<br />

many mucoralean fungi are employed in<br />

biotransformation processes (for references, see<br />

Kieslich, 1997). Further, a number of species are<br />

oleaginous, i.e. they are able <strong>to</strong> synthesize and<br />

accumulate lipids <strong>to</strong> over 20% (dry weight) of<br />

their biomass. Because these lipids (principally<br />

triacylglycerides) may be enriched in polyunsaturated<br />

fatty acids (PUFAs), oleaginous members<br />

of the Mucorales are of current biotechnological<br />

interest (Certik & Shimizu, 1999).<br />

Extensive studies of nutrition and physiology<br />

have been made. A wide variety of sugars can be<br />

used, and whilst starch can be decomposed by<br />

some species, cellulose is generally not utilized.<br />

Under anaerobic conditions, ethanol and numerous<br />

organic acids are produced. Many Mucorales<br />

need an external supply of vitamins for growth<br />

in synthetic culture. Thiamine is a common<br />

requirement, and the amount of growth of<br />

Phycomyces has been used as an assay for the<br />

concentration of thiamine.<br />

Zycha et al. (1969) have given a general<br />

account of the taxonomy of the Mucorales,<br />

including keys <strong>to</strong> genera and species. Benny<br />

et al. (2001) recognized 13 families and 57 genera.<br />

Classification and identification are based<br />

largely on the morphology of the anamorph.<br />

However, DNA sequence comparisons indicate<br />

that several families and even some larger<br />

genera are polyphyletic (O’Donnell et al., 2001),<br />

meaning that the traditional family-level classification<br />

scheme is artificial. We retain it here<br />

because it presents an accessible framework<br />

of morphological features within which the<br />

Mucorales can be unders<strong>to</strong>od, and because<br />

convincing alternative schemes have not yet<br />

been put forward.<br />

7.2.1 Growth and asexual reproduction<br />

The mycelium is coarse, coenocytic and<br />

richly branched, the branches tapering <strong>to</strong> fine<br />

Fig 7.2 Mucor mucedo. (a) Mycelium and young<br />

sporangiophores with globules of liquid attached. (b) Immature<br />

sporangium with the columella visible through the sporangial<br />

wall. (c) Dehisced sporangium showing the columella, the frill<br />

representing the remains of the sporangial wall, and<br />

sporangiospores.<br />

points (Fig. 7.2). Later, septa may appear.<br />

Thick-walled mycelial segments (chlamydospores)<br />

may be cut off by such septa (Benjamin,<br />

1979) and in certain species, e.g. Mucor racemosus,<br />

the presence of chlamydospores in sporangiophores<br />

may be a useful diagnostic feature<br />

(Fig. 7.14b). In anaerobic liquid culture, especially<br />

in the presence of CO 2 , several species of<br />

Mucor (e.g. M. rouxii) grow in a yeast-like instead<br />

of a filamen<strong>to</strong>us form (Fig. 7.3) but revert <strong>to</strong><br />

filamen<strong>to</strong>us growth in the renewed presence<br />

of O 2 . The cell walls of Mucorales are chemically<br />

complex (Ruiz-Herrera, 1992; Gooday, 1995).<br />

Chitin microfibrils are present but are often

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!