21.03.2015 Views

Introduction to Fungi, Third Edition

Introduction to Fungi, Third Edition

Introduction to Fungi, Third Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

622 UREDINIOMYCETES: UREDINALES (RUST FUNGI)<br />

Fig 22.9 Puccinia graminis. (a) T.S. spermogonium on a leaf of Berberis vulgaris.The spermogonium has penetrated the upper<br />

epidermis.The wall of the spermogonium is lined by tapering annellides which give rise <strong>to</strong> spermatia. (b) T.S. leaf of B. vulgaris<br />

showing a spermogonium and a pro<strong>to</strong>-aecium. (c) T.S. leaf of B. vulgaris showing an aecium in section.The aecium has burst through<br />

the lower epidermis of the host leaf. Note the columns consisting of alternating large and small cells.The large cells are the<br />

aeciospores.<br />

spore chains, whose outer walls are thick and<br />

fibrous. This layer forms a clearly defined border<br />

or peridium surrounding the spores. Eventually<br />

the peridium and spore chains burst through the<br />

lower epidermis. The peridium ruptures and<br />

aeciospores are now visible as orange-coloured<br />

cells enclosed by the white cup-like peridium<br />

(Fig. 22.8b). Since the aecia are commonly seen<br />

clustered <strong>to</strong>gether beneath a spermogonial<br />

lesion, this stage is popularly known as the<br />

cluster-cup stage. In a section through the centre<br />

of a group of young aecia, it is usually possible <strong>to</strong><br />

find the spermogonia penetrating the upper<br />

epidermis and the aecia penetrating the lower.<br />

The aeciospores are violently projected from the<br />

end of the spore chain by rounding off of the<br />

flattened interface between adjacent spores<br />

(Ingold, 1971). Aeciospores are unable <strong>to</strong> reinfect<br />

barberry but readily infect wheat or<br />

other grasses.<br />

It is relatively easy <strong>to</strong> establish and maintain<br />

P. graminis in garden situations by planting<br />

B. vulgaris and allowing Agropyron repens <strong>to</strong> grow<br />

underneath (Webster et al., 1999). The form most<br />

likely <strong>to</strong> grow is P. graminis f. sp. secalis which<br />

readily alternates between Berberis and grasses<br />

in Britain (Wilson & Henderson, 1966). In other<br />

countries the connection between Berberis and<br />

P. graminis f. sp. tritici is strong, and the first<br />

barberry eradication laws were implemented<br />

long before de Bary had formally proven the<br />

connection. The first recorded cases of such laws<br />

were in Rouen in 1660 and Massachusetts in 1755.<br />

The greatest effort by far was the barberry<br />

eradication campaign undertaken as a consequence<br />

of the 1916 epidemic in the United States.<br />

Widespread eradication of susceptible Berberis<br />

spp. started in 1918 and continued on a massive<br />

scale well in<strong>to</strong> the 1930s, and locally for several<br />

decades afterwards. Overall, this campaign is<br />

considered <strong>to</strong> have been successful, with wheat<br />

rust epidemics much reduced in severity, especially<br />

on a local scale. Because aeciospores are not<br />

particularly long-lived and are not produced in<br />

vast numbers, the direct impact of barberry<br />

bushes on wheat crops is limited <strong>to</strong> less than<br />

2 miles. Perhaps more importantly, barberry<br />

eradication also retarded the evolution of new<br />

races of P. graminis due <strong>to</strong> the reduced ability of<br />

the pathogen <strong>to</strong> reproduce sexually. Campbell<br />

and Long (2001) have provided a highly readable<br />

account of the eradication campaign in the USA.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!