21.03.2015 Views

Introduction to Fungi, Third Edition

Introduction to Fungi, Third Edition

Introduction to Fungi, Third Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

594 HETEROBASIDIOMYCETES<br />

Table 21.1. Orders and selected genera currently<br />

included in the Heterobasidiomycetes. After Wells<br />

and Bandoni (2001).<br />

Subclass Heterobasidiomycetidae<br />

1. Cera<strong>to</strong>basidiales (see below)<br />

Cera<strong>to</strong>basidium (anam. Rhizoc<strong>to</strong>nia ¼ Cera<strong>to</strong>rhiza).<br />

Thanatephorus (anam. Rhizoc<strong>to</strong>nia ¼ Moniliopsis).<br />

2. Tulasnellales (see Fig. 21.1b)<br />

Tulasnella (anam. Rhizoc<strong>to</strong>nia)<br />

3. Dacrymycetales (p. 598)<br />

Calocera<br />

Dacrymyces<br />

Ditiola<br />

4. Auriculariales (p. 601)<br />

Auricularia<br />

Exidia<br />

Pseudohydnum<br />

Sebacina<br />

SubclassTremellomycetidae<br />

1. Tremellales (p. 60 4)<br />

Cryp<strong>to</strong>coccus and Bullera (yeast forms;Table 24.1)<br />

Filobasidiella neoformans (see p.660)<br />

Tremella<br />

2. Christianseniales<br />

3. Filobasidiales (yeast forms; seeTable 24.1)<br />

4. Cys<strong>to</strong>filobasidiales (seeTable 24.1)<br />

Itersonilia (see p.493)<br />

Phaffia, Xanthophyllomyces (see p.665)<br />

5. Trichosporonales (yeastforms; seeTable 24.1)<br />

21.2 Cera<strong>to</strong>basidiales<br />

The most important members of this family<br />

belong <strong>to</strong> the anamorph genus Rhizoc<strong>to</strong>nia which<br />

we shall consider in detail. Sneh et al. (1996)<br />

and Roberts (1999) have compiled important<br />

reference works on this group. The secondary<br />

hyphae of Rhizoc<strong>to</strong>nia have conspicuous dolipore<br />

septa which are visible even with the light<br />

microscope (Tu et al., 1977). Electron microscopy<br />

studies have revealed the parenthesomes <strong>to</strong> be<br />

perforated by several large pores (Müller et al.,<br />

1998b). Clamp connections are not found in<br />

Rhizoc<strong>to</strong>nia but may be present in other members<br />

of the order. The hyphae of Rhizoc<strong>to</strong>nia are highly<br />

characteristic. Branches typically arise at a right<br />

angle <strong>to</strong> the leading hypha, with the branch<br />

point slightly constricted and a septum located a<br />

little way in<strong>to</strong> the branch (Fig. 21.2a). Depending<br />

on the species, the compartments of vegetative<br />

hyphae are binucleate or multinucleate; uninucleate<br />

hyphae are uncommon. Teleomorphic<br />

states are rare and conidia are not produced,<br />

but sclerotia of the loose type (see Fig. 1.16a) are<br />

frequently seen. The form-genus Rhizoc<strong>to</strong>nia has<br />

now been broken up in<strong>to</strong> several taxa which<br />

correlate with different teleomorphs (Moore,<br />

1987; Andersen & Stalpers, 1994). For instance,<br />

Moniliopsis has multinucleate hyphae and is<br />

referred <strong>to</strong> the teleomorph genus Thanatephorus<br />

whereas the hyphae of Cera<strong>to</strong>rhiza (teleomorph<br />

Cera<strong>to</strong>basidium) are binucleate (Tu et al., 1977;<br />

Vilgalys & Cubeta, 1994). <strong>Fungi</strong> resembling<br />

Rhizoc<strong>to</strong>nia transgress the boundaries of<br />

orders, with some teleomorphs referable <strong>to</strong> the<br />

Tulasnellales. Indeed, a few Rhizoc<strong>to</strong>nia-like fungi<br />

have even been assigned <strong>to</strong> the Ascomycota.<br />

Whereas hyphae of Rhizoc<strong>to</strong>nia are readily<br />

recognized as such, they offer few microscopic<br />

features for species identification, and a system<br />

based on anas<strong>to</strong>mosis groups, i.e. the ability of<br />

a given isolate <strong>to</strong> undergo plasmogamy with<br />

hyphae of defined tester strains, has been<br />

developed (Sneh et al., 1991). Such pairings may<br />

yield three different responses, with intermediate<br />

reactions also possible. (1) In genetically<br />

identical or closely related strains, anas<strong>to</strong>mosis<br />

leads <strong>to</strong> perfect fusion. (2) In less closely related<br />

members of the same anas<strong>to</strong>mosis group, anas<strong>to</strong>mosis<br />

is followed by death of the fusion cell due<br />

<strong>to</strong> vegetative incompatibility. (3) No anas<strong>to</strong>mosis<br />

occurs between members of different anas<strong>to</strong>mosis<br />

groups. The best-studied taxon, R. solani,<br />

contains about a dozen anas<strong>to</strong>mosis groups,<br />

some of which have been further divided in<strong>to</strong><br />

subgroups according <strong>to</strong> biochemical or other<br />

criteria. Although the individual anas<strong>to</strong>mosis<br />

groups within R. solani and other taxa (e.g.<br />

Cera<strong>to</strong>rhiza) correlate with phylogenetic clusters<br />

obtained by DNA-based phylogeny (Kuninaga<br />

et al., 1997; Gonzalez et al., 2001) and also <strong>to</strong><br />

a certain extent with the range of plant hosts

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!