21.03.2015 Views

Introduction to Fungi, Third Edition

Introduction to Fungi, Third Edition

Introduction to Fungi, Third Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

STRUCTURE AND MORPHOGENESIS OF BASIDIOCARPS<br />

517<br />

Table 19.1. Distribution of fruit body morphotypes among the major clades of Homobasidiomycetes shown<br />

in Fig. 19.2. From Hibbett and Thorn (2001).<br />

Major clades<br />

Hymenophore type<br />

(A)<br />

Agaricoid<br />

(B)<br />

Poroid<br />

(C)<br />

Hydnoid<br />

(D)<br />

Clavate<br />

(E)<br />

Resupinate<br />

(F)<br />

Epigeous<br />

gasteroid<br />

secotioid<br />

(G)<br />

Hypogeous<br />

gasteroid<br />

(1) Polyporoid þ þ þ þ þ þ<br />

(2) Euagarics þ þ þ þ þ þ<br />

(3) Bole<strong>to</strong>id þ þ þ þ þ þ<br />

(4) Thelephoroid þ þ þ þ þ<br />

(5) Russuloid þ þ þ þ þ þ þ<br />

(6) Hymenochae<strong>to</strong>id þ þ þ þ þ<br />

(7) Cantharelloid þ þ þ þ<br />

(8) Gomphoid phalloid þ þ þ þ þ þ<br />

morphotypes shown in Fig. 19.1. This finding<br />

is perhaps best explained by the assumption that<br />

the first Homobasidiomycetes had a morphologically<br />

simple fruit body form, probably the<br />

flattened (resupinate) type, from which more<br />

complex fruit bodies arose as numerous independent<br />

evolutionary events (Hibbett & Binder,<br />

2002). The class Gasteromycetes is an artificial<br />

taxon, comprising gasteroid and secotioid fruit<br />

body forms which have lost the capacity for<br />

violent basidiospore discharge and have adopted<br />

alternative mechanisms for spore dispersal<br />

(see Fig. 19.2). Because of unifying biological<br />

and morphological features, the gasteromycetes<br />

are described separately in Chapter 20, where<br />

we will refer <strong>to</strong> their affinity <strong>to</strong> the<br />

Homobasidiomycete clades.<br />

19.2 Structure and morphogenesis<br />

of basidiocarps<br />

The fleshy basidiocarps of many fungi belonging<br />

<strong>to</strong> groups 2 5, 7 and 8 in Fig. 19.2 (‘agarics’)<br />

differ from the <strong>to</strong>ugher fruit bodies found in the<br />

polyporoid and hymenochae<strong>to</strong>id clades 1 and 6<br />

(‘polypores’) in texture and construction. Agaric<br />

basidiocarps are often umbrella-shaped, with a<br />

centrally attached stalk (stipe) supporting the<br />

cap (pileus) beneath which are the gills or tubes<br />

lined by basidia. The polypores include bracket<br />

fungi with basidiocarps which often bear pores<br />

and are laterally attached <strong>to</strong> their substratum.<br />

These fruit bodies are usually firmer in texture,<br />

i.e. leathery, corky or woody. The differences in<br />

texture reflect fundamental principles of<br />

construction as shown by analysis of the<br />

hyphae composing the basidiocarp. There are<br />

also differences in development between agaricand<br />

polypore-type fruit bodies.<br />

19.2.1 Hyphal analysis<br />

Corner (1932a,b, 1953) dissected the basidiocarp<br />

tissues of various polypores and showed that<br />

they were constructed of three distinctive types<br />

of hyphae generative, binding and skeletal<br />

(see below). Later work by Corner and others has<br />

identified a further range of hyphal types<br />

making up basidiocarps (see Pegler, 1996; Kirk<br />

et al., 2001; Clémençon, 2004). This method of<br />

hyphal analysis provides valuable criteria which<br />

have greatly improved the taxonomy of the<br />

genera of agaric- and polypore-type fungi.<br />

However, it does not of itself provide the basis<br />

for a higher-level ‘natural classification’ of<br />

homobasidiomycetes.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!