6 Country Reports on Youth Work - Jugendpolitik in Europa

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 51: Public spending on voluntary organisations in Norwegian municipalities in Euro 77 100 Oslo Porsgrunn Nedre Eiker Frøya 78 Total Number of voluntary organisations receiving support 1274 101 26 1401 Average financial support per organisation receiving support (Euro) 6405 1709 5370 6047 Total public spending on voluntary organisations 8159970 172609 139620 8472199 Financial support for voluntary organisations per inhabitant 15 5 6 14 The number of voluntary organisations presented in the table includes both organisations that conduct youth work and those that does not. This means that we do not know for sure how much of the support goes to youth work. Because Oslo is both a city and a county there is some supplementary information on the financial support granted to voluntary organisations. Table 52: Financial support from Frifond and from local government authorities to youth organisations, groups and associations in Oslo in Euro 79 Financial support Average support per inhabitant aged 13 - 26 Frifond 1371250 10,8 Local government 1475000 11,6 Total 2846250 22,4 The table shows average support per inhabitant aged 13 – 26 because there is no information on the number of members in the organisation receiving financial support from Frifond. The total number of members in the organisations receiving financial founding from local government authorities is 16,350. This represents an average support of 97.9 euros per member. In addition to these figures, organisations also receive financial funding on a national level, and some of the money is transferred to local and regional level. This means that the financial support for voluntary organisations conducting youth work is probably higher than what has been presented. There is very little information available on youth workers in voluntary organisations. Therefore this section will focus on youth workers in public organisations. The numbers presented includes both employees working with young people and employees working with children, as it was impossible to separate these two categories. The information from the four municipalities is not added together when there is no information from Oslo, because Oslo is by far the largest municipality, and the numbers then would be misleading. 77 Source: KOSTRA 78 79 No information for Frøya available on KOSTRA Source: Frifond
Table 53: Youth workers in Norwegian municipalities 80 Oslo Porsgrunn Nedre Eiker Full-time positions in child welfare per 1000 inhabitant aged 0 – 17 81 3 3,2 2,9 2,8 Full-time positions in public youth clubs, holiday clubs, mc-centers, music workshops, media workshops per 1000 inhabitant aged 0 – 17* Frøya 1,6 1,0 1,2 4,6 The number of full-time positions in child welfare per 1000 inhabitants is similar for the four municipalities. Frøya has substantially more employees per inhabitant in youth clubs than the other municipalities. This is probably because the municipality covers a large area. This means that they must have more youth clubs than they would if the municipality was smaller. Table 54: Employees in Norwegian municipalities in child welfare 82 Oslo 83 Porsgrunn Nedre Eiker Frøya Number of employees 27 20 3 Total Full time positions 306.8 23.5 17.5 3 350.8 Male 2 4 0 Female 25 16 3 Education Higher Higher Higher Most youth workers in child welfare have higher education as this is required for these kinds of positions. The table also shows that there are far more males than females working in child welfare. The most reliable source of information we have on participation is Young in Oslo 2006 and Young in Porsgrunn 2002. In addition some statistics from KOSTRA and the Youth Work Survey will be presented. KOSTRA contains only information about participation in youth work conducted by public organisations. The Youth Work Survey also only contains information about public youth work because of the difficulties involved in doing a survey on voluntary organisations discussed earlier. 80 Source: KOSTRA, Youth Work Survey 81 the employees in child welfare services works both with children and youth 82 83 the employees in child welfare services works both with children and youth little available information for Oslo 101
Page 1:
INSTITUT FÜR SOZIALARBEIT UND SOZI
Page 4 and 5:
10.11 Comparative Overview of local
Page 6 and 7:
6 � The study identified the foll
Page 8 and 9:
The money and time invested in yout
Page 10 and 11:
The main reasons for the situation
Page 12 and 13:
Because of the different national h
Page 14 and 15:
2 Introduction “Youth activities
Page 16 and 17:
This report focuses on the structur
Page 18 and 19:
Table 1: Data about of youth work Y
Page 20 and 21:
The partners developed questionnair
Page 22 and 23:
Despite this situation, the experts
Page 24 and 25:
countries like Austria, Germany, Es
Page 26 and 27:
pleasure, and desire, by strengthen
Page 28 and 29:
young people, such as the Internet,
Page 30 and 31:
6 Country
Page 32 and 33:
6.2 Estonia Youth work in Estonia i
Page 34 and 35:
Volunteering has always been crucia
Page 36 and 37:
and straddles the fields of educati
Page 38 and 39:
young people through local planning
Page 40 and 41:
6.9 Romania In Romania, the general
Page 42 and 43:
concerned with strengthening and le
Page 44 and 45:
Table 8: Qualification of Youth Wor
Page 46 and 47:
8 Survey Results 8.1 Availability o
Page 48 and 49:
Table 9: Availability of data and s
Page 50 and 51: Spain No national system of reporti
Page 52 and 53: 9 Results from the National Statist
Page 54 and 55: An analysis of the overview allows
Page 56 and 57: existence of a compulsory annual da
Page 58 and 59: Table 12: Youth work in Estonia 58
Page 60 and 61: were funded with € 1,066,100 and
Page 62 and 63: Table 16: Youth work in Ireland 62
Page 64 and 65: Table 18: Youth work in Norway 64 D
Page 66 and 67: Table 20: Youth work in Spain 66 Da
Page 68 and 69: 68 � in some countries data on pa
Page 70 and 71: 10 Results from the Local Statistic
Page 72 and 73: this age group. The modus is 15 par
Page 74 and 75: which of these activities should be
Page 76 and 77: offices of the state governments an
Page 78 and 79: Table 29: Funding of youth work in
Page 80 and 81: Table 31: Participants in youth wor
Page 82 and 83: Table 32: Youth work activities in
Page 86 and 87: pattern was consistent across the f
Page 88 and 89: (iv) Midleton Youth Project The Mid
Page 90 and 91: Comments: Differences between natio
Page 92 and 93: Comments: In Italy it was again not
Page 94 and 95: activities, open youth work / youth
Page 98 and 99: voluntary organisations and to send
Page 102 and 103: Table 55: Members of organisations
Page 104 and 105: 10.9 Romania Data base: The data pr
Page 106 and 107: Three years ago, an annual project
Page 110 and 111: almost all of the activities. Relat
Page 114 and 115: 10.11.2 Comparative overview of you
Page 116 and 117: 10.11.3 Comparative overview of you
Page 118 and 119: In Greece and Spain recreation acti
Page 120 and 121: limited financial funds, the youth
Page 122 and 123: the accomplishment of youth-specifi
Page 124 and 125: from the street culture that define
Page 126 and 127: structures. Cooperation with the po
Page 128 and 129: focusing only on young people in vo
Page 130 and 131: members in organisations, or access
Page 132 and 133: intensive work to define common cat
Page 134 and 135: 134 � further strengthening the e
Page 136 and 137: 13 References Bundesministerium fü
Page 138 and 139: 14 List of project partners Austria
Page 140 and 141: Partnership Programme between the E
Page 142: Table 43: Budgets of youth work in
show all

6 Country Reports on Youth Work - Jugendpolitik in Europa

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?