18.03.2015 Views

The Explosive Child – Dr. Ross Greene - GSSD Blogs

The Explosive Child – Dr. Ross Greene - GSSD Blogs

The Explosive Child – Dr. Ross Greene - GSSD Blogs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Tracy’s Notes from <strong>Dr</strong>. <strong>Ross</strong> Green’s <strong>Explosive</strong> <strong>Child</strong> Conference<br />

May 2008<br />

3 <strong>The</strong>mes…<br />

<strong>The</strong> Collaborative Problem Solving Approach (CPS)<br />

1) Kids do well if they can…. We need to adopt this as a philosophy. If they can’t<br />

do well, we need to figure out what’s getting in the way, so we can help. Don’t<br />

use ‘kids do well if they want to’, because we all choose to do well if we can.<br />

2) Your explanation guides your intervention… How we explain what’s going on<br />

tells us what we’re going to do about it.<br />

3) Definition of “Good Parenting”, “Good Teaching” and “Good Treatment”…<br />

Being responsive to the hand you’ve been dealt. Don’t treat kids exactly the<br />

same; if you do, your not giving them what they need. Kids need different things.<br />

Conventional Wisdom: It’s not working - we often blame passive, permissive,<br />

inconsistent parenting and say the kid has learned that challenging behavior is an<br />

effective means of getting what they want (attention, or avoiding something such as<br />

homework). We need to question this traditional philosophy.<br />

Logical Intervention for our Conventional Wisdom: This is what we usually do -<br />

Train and motivate adaptive behavior through an intensive, consistent program of<br />

consequences and ignoring. This is what we’re doing, but is it working? We commonly<br />

suspend these students who don’t comply. We put too much energy into trying to make<br />

kids ‘want to…”<br />

Unconventional Wisdom - It’s a Developmental Delay: <strong>The</strong> child is<br />

delayed in the development of crucial cognitive skills – often including<br />

flexibility/adaptability, frustration tolerance, and problem solving ….or has significant<br />

difficulty applying these skills when they are most needed. (<strong>The</strong>y are lacking the skills to<br />

do thing in an adaptive way when they exhibit maladaptive behavior.) <strong>The</strong> belief is that<br />

these kids are deficit in skills, not in motivation.<br />

Maladaptive Behavior – includes, but not limited to, explosions. It occurs when the<br />

demands being placed on the person are higher than the person’s capacity to respond<br />

adaptively. <strong>The</strong>re is a spectrum of maladaptive behaviors ranging from pouting/sulking,<br />

to self injury to killing self or others. <strong>The</strong>se people are lacking skills. Challenging<br />

behavior is a learning disability just like reading – it is a deficit in skills so we should<br />

apply the same philosophy – teach them the skills they are lacking. Don’t treat them as if<br />

they could do better, but just don’t want to.


So the logical intervention…. Identify the lagging skills that are<br />

contributing to the maladaptive behavior and teach them; identify the<br />

problems precipitating maladaptive behavior and work toward solving them (while<br />

maintaining adults as authority figures). An authority figure is someone who identifies<br />

the problem and fixes it.<br />

Mantra… behind every challenging behavior is either an unsolved<br />

problem or a lagging skill. Let’s not just blame parents for challenging behavior<br />

that we’re not handling any better than they are.<br />

CPS Overview<br />

<strong>The</strong> CPS model views maladaptive behavior as a developmental delay and so the<br />

emphasis is on…<br />

• Different assessment (cognition, not behavior)<br />

o What’s going on in this kid’s head that we wish wasn’t?<br />

o What’s not going on in this kids’ head that we wish was?<br />

• Different goals of intervention - teaching lacking skills and solving problems, not<br />

teaching adults to be more effective at imposing their will and ensuring that kids<br />

have the incentive to comply.<br />

CPS Treatment Ingredients<br />

• Answer the question, “What lagging thinking skills and unsolved problems are<br />

setting the stage for the negative behavior in this child?”<br />

• Be aware of what your options are – for pursuing expectations, creating a helping<br />

relationship, teaching skills, solving problems, and reducing challenging behavior,<br />

and what each option accomplishes.<br />

• Successfully execute Plan B<br />

Pathways: <strong>The</strong> Hand You’ve Been Dealt (each of these categories contain a number<br />

of skills):<br />

• Executive Skills (often our kids with ADHD)<br />

• Language Processing Skills<br />

• Emotion Regulation Skills (kids with depression or anxiety)<br />

• Cognitive flexibility skills (Autism Spectrum Disorder)<br />

• Social Skills (Autism Spectrum Disorder)<br />

Lagging Skills:<br />

• Difficulty handling transitions, shifting from one mindset or task to another<br />

(shifting cognitive set) – the demands of their environment are hard on them. We<br />

want them to comply immediately and we demand this often of children lacking<br />

the skills to change/shift mindset. Kids need a chance to process the instructions<br />

or demands placed upon them. When rushed, the child will likely exhibit a<br />

behavior on the spectrum of maladaptive behavior because they can’t live up to<br />

the expectations placed on them.


• Difficulty reflecting on multiple thoughts or ideas simultaneously<br />

• Difficulty considering a range of solutions to a problem – they need to learn<br />

organized, planful problem solving (help them define the problem, consider<br />

possible solutions, and anticipate likely outcomes). When you ask them what the<br />

problem is, they often say “I don’t know” – help them sort out what the problem<br />

is.<br />

• Disorganized, impulsive problem solving – Kids who often can’t think of<br />

anything past their first solution, or they are so impulsive that they do the first<br />

thing that pops into their head. And often, the minute there’s a change in<br />

schedule or a ‘bump in the road’, these kids resist. Give them time and they may<br />

respond. Teach these kids to say “Can you give me a minute?” instead of “No”.<br />

And teach adults to ‘give them a minute”. Challenging behavior takes much<br />

longer to deal with than giving a kid a moment to comply. Be proactive rather<br />

than reactive. Prevention rather than intervention.<br />

• Difficulty considering the likely outcomes or consequences of actions<br />

(impulsive) Help them realize that the first solution is often not the right one. It<br />

usually takes more in-depth thinking to find a good solution.<br />

• Difficulty expressing concerns, needs or thoughts in words – We think through<br />

language. When language is challenged, humans can resemble dogs. For<br />

example, when upset and lacking language, we have three options – to bark at you<br />

(swearing is the ‘human bark’), lash out, or run away. <strong>The</strong> ability to express<br />

one’s self through language is a critical factor in behavior. If you think of adults,<br />

don’t we swear when we are frustrated and can’t think of a better way to express<br />

ourselves?<br />

Non-verbal children have difficulty letting others know what’s going on in their<br />

heads. <strong>The</strong>y often can’t tell us what’s bugging them so they revert to maladaptive<br />

behavior. Even non-verbal kids can use CPS to learn adaptive behavior.<br />

Remember, rewarding and punishing doesn’t teach kids language skills. If<br />

they are lacking language, we have to find ways to help them express themselves.<br />

• Difficulty managing emotional response to frustration so as to think<br />

rationally – kids need to be able to separate their emotions from the thinking they<br />

need to do to solve a problem. We need to do that to be able to actually solve<br />

problems. Teach them to think clearly in the midst of frustration and to stay calm<br />

enough to make this happen.<br />

• Chronic irritability and/or anxiety significantly impedes capacity for<br />

problem solving – when you treat an irritable kid like a pain in the butt, he’ll just<br />

get more irritable. Sometimes mood drugs can help, but remember, ‘pills don’t<br />

teach skills’, they just open the door for skills to be taught. Medication<br />

doesn’t fix bullying, learning disabilities etc. That’s why these kids need<br />

counselling as well. Many challenging kids are also sleep deprived – something<br />

to keep in mind as well.


Medication helps well with these conditions:<br />

• Inattention/disorganized thinking<br />

• Hyperactivity-impulsivity<br />

• Irritability/obsessiveness<br />

• Mood instability<br />

• General anxiety<br />

• Sleep<br />

• Tics<br />

More Lagging Skills:<br />

• Difficulty seeing the ‘greys’. <strong>The</strong>se are concrete, literal black and white<br />

thinkers – black and white thinkers are stuck in a grey world. As kids mature<br />

and develop, we expect more ‘grey thinking’, but some kids don’t develop this.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se are often our ASD kids. <strong>The</strong>y do much better with factual information and<br />

that’s why they seem so bright, because they can recall facts and all kinds of<br />

information. We have to be careful not to expect them to just understand our<br />

‘grey world’ and try to understand why they are having difficulty. <strong>The</strong>y do not<br />

choose to be this way – no one would choose to be this way.<br />

• Difficulty deviating from rules, routines, original plan – often our ASD kids<br />

• Difficulty handling unpredictability, ambiguity, uncertainty – they have<br />

difficulty being able to modify their thinking – they need to realize that you can’t<br />

solve each problem with the same solution. Different problem = different<br />

solution.<br />

• Difficulty taking into account situational factors that would suggest the need<br />

to adjust a plan of action.<br />

• Difficulty appreciating how his/her behavior is affecting other people; these<br />

kids are often surprised by others’ responses to his/her behavior – Social<br />

skills difficulty; many people in prison lack this skill. <strong>The</strong>y can’t interpret<br />

feedback from others – the smiles, the frowns of disapproval etc. <strong>The</strong>y don’t<br />

know how to adjust their behavior depending on the reaction they get from others.<br />

Teach them what various facial expressions and body language indicates.<br />

• Inflexible, inaccurate interpretation/cognitive distortion or bias – <strong>The</strong>se are<br />

the kids who think, “I’m stupid, things will never work out for me, it’s not fair,<br />

nobody likes me, you always blame me, people are out to get me etc.” This is an<br />

example of “what’s going on in their heads that we wish wasn’t.” <strong>The</strong>y interpret<br />

things as others are out to get them and then they retaliate.<br />

Bottom line – don’t punish these kids for what they can’t help!<br />

Challenging behavior is set in motion by lagging skills.<br />

Assessment Tools for assessing lagging skills:<br />

• Assessment of Lagging Skills and Unsolved Problems (ALSUP) – attached<br />

• Situational Analysis<br />

• Formal Testing (sometimes)


Most of the information can be gathered from the first two. Don’t try to make a<br />

diagnosis, but rather try to find the skills that are lacking and then materials needed to<br />

teach the skills. We need to transform school discipline and make it more proactive by<br />

identifying the skills that the challenging kids are lacking.<br />

ALSUP<br />

• Is a list of skills that are frequently found to be lacking in kids with social,<br />

emotional and behavioral challenges.<br />

• It is meant to be used as a discussion guide for achieving a plan – not simply a<br />

checklist.<br />

• Use the ALSUP in case meetings and have all collaborative team members fill it<br />

out together. <strong>The</strong>n come to a consensus on the lagging skills in the child. This<br />

helps the team focus on developing a proactive plan to teach skills that are<br />

lacking.<br />

Situational Analysis<br />

In what circumstances does this kid exhibit challenging behavior?<br />

• Triggers (the who, what and when of challenging behavior)<br />

o Home – homework, screen time, diet, interactions with a particular<br />

family member, going to bed, morning routine, sensory issues etc.<br />

o School – circle time, getting down to work, staying on task, riding the<br />

bus, recess, lunch, interactions with a specific person, sensory issues<br />

etc.<br />

o 10% rule – if it causes trouble 10% or more of the time, write it down<br />

as a problem. List the unsolved problems.<br />

Challenging behaviors are highly predictable. It is not true that you never know when<br />

he is going to blow – you’ll find this out if you document the unsolved problems through<br />

situational analysis. If you find out, then you can intervene proactively rather than<br />

reactively to a blowup.<br />

<strong>The</strong> following are dead-end explanations that don’t allow us to intervene because we<br />

don’t know what skills the kid is lacking. eg. “He has bipolar disease, she’s adopted, he<br />

just wants attention, he wants his own way, he wants control, he’s manipulating us, she<br />

has a bad attitude, she makes bad choices, she won’t cooperate.”<br />

Actually many of us want control and want things our way, BUT we learn to<br />

do it in adaptive ways rather than maladaptive ways. If a child is using maladaptive<br />

behavior to get what he wants, we have to assume that he doesn’t have adaptive skills.<br />

If the explanation guides the intervention, all of these excuses lead to dead ends<br />

because these are things we can’t change, BUT we can TEACH SKILLS, so let’s focus<br />

on the skills that are lacking.<br />

It’s so important to make this a collaborative process with the parents, however, if<br />

parents choose not to implement a proactive plan at home, it’s still important to have one<br />

environment doing the right thing and teaching the skills the child is lacking.


Are we really giving kids the opportunity to cooperate and collaborate? We are<br />

quick to say they won’t cooperative, but make sure they have the opportunity.<br />

Our traditional method is to teach kids right from wrong and employ consequences.<br />

Sometimes natural consequences also teach kids lessons. Most kids actually know right<br />

from wrong, they just can’t deliver due to their lack of skills. If you employ<br />

consequences, don’t make them unnatural and illogical, and expect them to be effective.<br />

Instead, ask yourself, what skills is this kid lacking?<br />

Think twice about using a reward program where the good kids are always rewarded in<br />

the class and the ones who have challenging behavior often don’t get the reward. You<br />

don’t have to teach the good kids how to behave – they already know. All this does is<br />

cause frustration to the child who is lacking the skills to do well. Teach them the skills<br />

he is lacking and make adaptations to allow him to achieve and succeed. Decrease his<br />

frustration and you’ll decrease the maladaptive behavior.<br />

Don’t say a child isn’t motivated. Believe that every child wants to do well, they’re<br />

just lacking skills to get them there. Imagine if a child was drowning (obviously lacks<br />

swimming skills), would you say “He’s not motivated to live.” Would you offer him a<br />

sticker if he saves himself? Would you say he’s just seeking attention? Would you<br />

threaten him with a time out if he doesn’t save himself? How silly!! We can’t let kids<br />

drown!<br />

Three Plans:<br />

Plan A – impose adult will – this is the most popular and the way we usually operate.<br />

Plan A works for some kids, but it causes challenging behavior in challenging kids.<br />

It’s also Plan A when we say, “You need to do this or else…..you have to leave the class<br />

etc.)<br />

Plan B – collaborative problem solving – will accomplish all goals below. This is a<br />

model where you do something ‘with the kid’, not ‘to the kid.”<br />

Plan C – <strong>Dr</strong>op it (for now, at least) For example, “I know the skills this kid is lacking<br />

from doing the ALSUP. I’ll remove some expectations for now so I can focus on the<br />

priorities. I can’t fix all the problems at once.” This is one way to reduce challenging<br />

behavior because you remove expectations that the kid can’t meet.<br />

Only Plan B addresses all of the following:<br />

- pursues unmet expectations<br />

- creates a helping relationship<br />

- identifies and teaches lagging thinking skills<br />

- collaboratively solves problems<br />

- reduces challenging behavior<br />

* If all you’re using is Plan A and C, then you’re just picking your battles, but you’re<br />

still battling!


We need to use Plan B because the child has shown he needs someone to serve as his<br />

‘tour guide’ for navigating problems and regulating emotions. Over time, this plan<br />

will teach kids skills so they won’t need help for the rest of their life. Once they learn the<br />

skills they are lacking, the problems can be solved. We wouldn’t say that we can’t give a<br />

child in Gr. 2 reading help because he might need it for the rest of his life. Instead, we<br />

would develop a plan to teach him the skills he is lacking. We need to do the same with<br />

behavior – treat it like a learning disability and teach skills that are lacking.<br />

Remember, an unrealistic expectation is a challenging behavior waiting to happen.<br />

Have realistic expectations.<br />

Two forms of Plan B:<br />

• Emergency – takes place in the midst of maladaptive behavior; can be used<br />

for solving problems, but more useful for crisis management or de-escalation.<br />

<strong>The</strong> hard way is starting with this plan - don’t wait to talk about homework<br />

issues until your child’s in the middle of a hard assignment that’s due<br />

tomorrow.<br />

• Proactive B – This is the most preferable and most important. It takes place<br />

well before the maladaptive behavior recurs; you are more likely to solve<br />

problems durably here.<br />

Plan B Entry Steps<br />

1. Empathy - the goal of this stage is to gather information and achieve an<br />

understanding of the kid’s concern or perspective on an issue.<br />

a. Begin with a neutral observation ie. ‘I’ve noticed that…’ and end with<br />

‘what’s up?’<br />

b. Use reassurance for additional calming – “I’m not saying you must”, “I’m<br />

not mad at you”, I’m just trying to understand”, “I’m not saying you<br />

can’t.”<br />

c. You must get a very clear understanding of the child’s perspective. Don’t<br />

rush – you’re not done with this step until you have a clear understanding<br />

of the kid’s concern or perspective<br />

d. May require ‘drilling down’ or further clarification – “How so?”, “I don’t<br />

quite understand”, “Can you tell me more about that?”, “I’m confused.”<br />

e. Be prepared for surprises – we are often wrong in what we think the<br />

problem is. Problems you’re not aware of can surface here.<br />

f. Be neutral and blameless.<br />

2. Define the problem – the goal is to ensure that the adult’s concern or perspective<br />

is entered into consideration (possibly with “<strong>The</strong> thing is…” or “My concern<br />

is…”<br />

a. Just get concerns on the table right now, don’t worry about solutions yet.<br />

We’re quick to try to put solutions out – let them be part of coming up<br />

with solutions later.<br />

b. Reminder – dueling solutions = a power struggle. CPS is a win/win<br />

situation where dueling solutions is a win/lose or power struggle.


c. If there are only adult concerns on the table, it’s Plan A.<br />

d. If there are only child concerns on the table, it’s Plan C.<br />

e. If there’s both, then it’s Plan B.<br />

f. Good adult concerns – safety, learning, how behavior is affecting others<br />

g. What if the kid doesn’t care about your concerns? You could thank him<br />

for being honest, and tell him that you’re really trying to take his concerns<br />

into account, and if he could try to take yours into account, maybe we<br />

could get somewhere and not always be fighting. “Let’s be on the same<br />

team” or “Let’s work together to solve this problem”.<br />

3. Invitation – Goal is to brainstorm solutions together so as to address both<br />

concerns.<br />

a. Let the child know that this is something you’re doing with him rather<br />

than to him.<br />

b. Invite the kid to help you solve the problem. Give him a chance to express<br />

his ideas so he knows you value his opinion.<br />

c. “Let’s think of how we can work that out.”, “Let’s see if we can solve that<br />

problem.”, or “I wonder if there’s a way...”<br />

d. Give the child first opportunity to generate solutions – “Do you have any<br />

ideas on how we could…” but resolution of the problem is part of a team<br />

effort.<br />

e. Don’t think adults are the only ones who can come up with good ideas. If<br />

you are truly doing Plan B, you will have no idea where things will end<br />

up.<br />

f. Don’t be fearful of this process because any solution that the two parties<br />

agree upon must be realistic and mutually satisfactory. Your concerns<br />

and various solutions will be addressed just as the child’s. He won’t<br />

explode because he feels like part of the plan and that his concerns are<br />

being heard. <strong>The</strong> skills he needs are being taught to him through this<br />

process. Don’t agree to do something you don’t agree with. Keep<br />

talking until you can find a solution that works for both of you.<br />

Beginning B<br />

• Start with triggers – “I noticed that when you lose points in class, it’s very<br />

upsetting for you. What’s up?<br />

• Start with triggers rather than lagging skills as it’s too hard to start this way. Only<br />

start with lagging skills when kids are lacking the skills to do Plan B in the first<br />

place.<br />

• Choose triggers that are contributing to the kid’s worst moments and the<br />

maladaptive behavior most often, and those that would be most conducive to<br />

success.<br />

• Plan B always ends with an agreement that we’ll keep talking and address<br />

concerns as they arise.


Emergency B<br />

• Only difference is timing and the wording of the Empathy step (reflective<br />

listening)<br />

• Biggest challenges for schools in transforming school discipline<br />

o Improving adult’s understanding of challenging behavior<br />

o Shifting from reactive to proactive mechanisms<br />

o Involving kids in solving the problem – hearing their perspective<br />

o Principals need to get staffs to collaborate with kids using Plan B rather<br />

than just bringing the student to the principal and expecting them to fix the<br />

problem using Plan A. This is not effective.<br />

Trouble Shooting Plan B<br />

Factors to consider if Plan B isn’t going well:<br />

• Missing steps – empathy or invitation<br />

• Using A instead of B<br />

• Steps out of order<br />

• Failure to drill down – the problem is not as explicit as you need. A poorly<br />

described problem will affect the outcomes/solutions that will arise. Go back if<br />

you have to and gather more information if needed.<br />

• Solutions, rather than concerns are on the table.<br />

• Over-reliance on Emergency B – proactive B is calmer, you get more information<br />

and you have more time.<br />

This is Hard!<br />

• Early on it feels like slogging through mud<br />

• Over time a rhythm should develop<br />

• Very difficult problems will require more than one discussion<br />

• Sometimes it’s necessary to take a break from the discussion and return to it later,<br />

after both parties have had more time to think<br />

• Initially, the kid is likely to propose solutions that are not realistic or mutually<br />

satisfactory<br />

• <strong>The</strong> first solution seldom solves the problem durably<br />

• This is a process, not a technique. Things are not solved in an instant.<br />

• By achieving a clear understanding of the kid’s lagging skills, challenging<br />

episodes are reduced.<br />

• By decreasing the use of Plan A, you further reduce challenging episodes<br />

• By increasing the use of Plan C, you also further reduce challenging episodes<br />

• By increasing the use of Plan B, many problems are being solved and skills being<br />

trained … and again you further reduce challenging episodes<br />

What if the kid can’t or won’t talk?<br />

• Identify and articulate concerns so as to identify the problem to be solved<br />

o Educated guessing – there’s only a certain number of possibilities or<br />

reasons for the problem. If you make an educated guess, you may be<br />

able to guess the problem.


o Have kids understand their triggers and then point to pictures or learn<br />

to use phrases to communicate the problem. Have a list of common<br />

triggers with related pictures they can use ie. Hungry, too hot,<br />

someone’s teasing me, someone’s mad at me, don’t feel good etc.<br />

o Train a rudimentary vocabulary for verbalizing concerns. Teach them<br />

to say, “Something is wrong”, “Give me a minute”, “I don’t know<br />

what to do”, “I need a break,” or have a picture cue that they can use to<br />

relay this. This will help them lengthen their fuse so they don’t resort<br />

to maladaptive behavior when they can’t express what’s wrong.<br />

• Consider possible solutions<br />

o If the kid has no ideas, you could say, “Well, I have some. Want to<br />

hear them?” Phrase them as proposals, not directives.<br />

o Train a rote problem solving vocabulary – ask for help, give a<br />

little (compromise), do it in a different way. Teach kids they can<br />

use these three steps to solve problems in all environments.<br />

Powerful Quotes<br />

• Fair does not mean equal.<br />

• In our classroom, everyone gets what they need.<br />

• In our classroom, we help each other.<br />

o Teach kids to empathize with others.<br />

o When teachers do the same for all kids, they have little to show for their<br />

efforts.<br />

o Would a doctor give each patient the same treatment, or would they give<br />

each patient what they needed? That’s what teachers need to do too.<br />

Important <strong>The</strong>mes<br />

• Remain calmly optimistic and relentlessly persistent in the face of all odds<br />

• All change is incremental (and collaborative)<br />

• To implement this, you need staffs to recognize that what they are doing isn’t<br />

working and they need to try something different – Plan B.<br />

• Plan B sets limits as much as Plan A – just without the challenging behavior<br />

• Our world is a Plan B world – kids need to learn how to share their ideas and<br />

concerns in an appropriate way and to compromise/collaborate if they are to be<br />

successful as an adult.<br />

• Just punishing them doesn’t teach them real world skills. Our role is to ‘figure<br />

out what’s getting in the way’ of a child doing well.<br />

• All challenging behavior tells us is that we have something to fix, but we have to<br />

figure out what needs fixing.<br />

• <strong>The</strong>re are way too many suspensions and expulsions because we haven’t learned<br />

how to effectively deal with kids who are lacking skills.<br />

• All behavior, no matter how bad, is due to kids not being able to meet the<br />

demands placed on them.<br />

• Never forget – it’s about the kids!<br />

Additional information at www.thinkkids.org

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!