16.03.2015 Views

WINNER II pdf - Final Report - Cept

WINNER II pdf - Final Report - Cept

WINNER II pdf - Final Report - Cept

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>WINNER</strong> <strong>II</strong> D1.1.2 V1.2<br />

5.6 Approximation of Channel Models<br />

<strong>WINNER</strong> Generic model is aimed to be applicable for many different simulations and to cover high<br />

number of scenarios with several combinations of large-scale and small-scale parameters. Generic<br />

model is the most accurate model and is recommended to be used whenever possible. However, in<br />

some simulations, channel model can be simplified (approximated) to reduce the simulation<br />

complexity. It has to be done very carefully. When approximating the model, reality is reduced, and<br />

the impact of the approximation has to be understood. The impact of the approximation depends on,<br />

e.g., the transceiver system, algorithms, modulation, coding, multi-antenna technology, and required<br />

accuracy of the simulation results. If someone is uncertain whether approximation affects on the<br />

simulation results or not, it is better not to approximate. Therefore, the following approximation steps<br />

can only be done by the simulation experts.<br />

Firstly, we can approximate the model by assuming all the large scale parameters fixed to median<br />

values. Furthermore, we can reduce the model by fixing the delays, but keep angles as random. The<br />

third approximation can be done by freezing all propagation parameters to obtain so called Clustered<br />

Delay Line (CDL) model. If, from a good reason, correlation model is desired, we can calculate<br />

correlation matrices from the CDL model by fixing the antenna structure. Kronecker approach can<br />

simplify the model even further, and finally, independent channels make the model very simple, but at<br />

the same time very inaccurate. The approximation steps are shown below.<br />

A) <strong>WINNER</strong> <strong>II</strong> Generic Model (D1.1.2)<br />

B) Fixed large scale parameters<br />

C) Constant delays, random angles (“CDL with random angles”)<br />

D) <strong>WINNER</strong> <strong>II</strong> CDL Model (D1.1.2)<br />

E) Tapped Delay Line model (delays are taken from CDL) with MIMO Correlation Matrix<br />

F) Tapped Delay Line model with TX and RX Correlation Matrix, MIMO correlation is<br />

obtained via Kronecker product.<br />

G) Tapped Delay Line model, zero correlation between MIMO channels.<br />

Page 60 (82)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!