16.03.2015 Views

WINNER II pdf - Final Report - Cept

WINNER II pdf - Final Report - Cept

WINNER II pdf - Final Report - Cept

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>WINNER</strong> <strong>II</strong> D1.1.2 V1.2<br />

Table 4-3 Far scatterer radii and attenuations for B2 and C3.<br />

Scenario FS min FS max FS loss<br />

B2 150 m 500 m 4 dB/µs<br />

C3 300 m 1500 m 2 dB/µs<br />

Step 2:<br />

For C3 create 20 delays as described for C2 model in section 4.2. step 5. For the shortest 18 delays create<br />

a typical urban C2 channel profile (powers and angles) as in section 4.2.<br />

Similarly, create 16 delays for B1 NLOS, and for the shortest 14 delays create a typical B1 NLOS<br />

channel profile as in section 4.2.<br />

The last two delays in B2 and C3 are assigned for far scatterer clusters.<br />

Step 3:<br />

Create typical urban channel powers P ’ for FS clusters substituting equation (4.5) of section 4.2 step 6<br />

−Ζn<br />

' 10<br />

with = 10 , where Ζ n ~ N(0, ζ ) is the per cluster shadowing term in [dB].<br />

P n<br />

Step 4:<br />

Next create excess delays due to far scatterer clusters as<br />

Attenuate FS clusters as FS loss, given in Table 4-3.<br />

Step 5:<br />

d<br />

BS −> FS −> MS<br />

− d<br />

LOS<br />

τ<br />

excess<br />

=<br />

(4.22)<br />

c<br />

Select directions of departure and arrival for each FS cluster according to far scatterer locations. i.e.<br />

corresponding to a single reflection from far scatterer.<br />

It is worth noticing that depending on the location of the mobile user within the cell the FS clusters may<br />

appear also at shorter delays than the maximum C2 or B1 NLOS cluster. In such cases the far scatterers<br />

do not necessarily result to increased angular or delay dispersion. Also the actual channel statistics of the<br />

bad urban users depend somewhat on the cell size.<br />

4.3 Path loss models<br />

Path loss models for the various <strong>WINNER</strong> scenarios have been developed based on results of<br />

measurements carried out within <strong>WINNER</strong>, as well as results from the open literature. These path loss<br />

models are typically of the form of (4.23), where d is the distance between the transmitter and the receiver<br />

in [m], f c is the system frequency in [GHz], the fitting parameter A includes the path-loss exponent,<br />

parameter B is the intercept, parameter C describes the path loss frequency dependence, and X is an<br />

optional, environment-specific term (e.g., wall attenuation in the A1 NLOS scenario).<br />

⎛<br />

PL = Alog ( d[ m ])<br />

+ B + C log10<br />

⎜<br />

⎝<br />

f<br />

c<br />

[ GHz]<br />

5.0<br />

⎞<br />

⎟ + X<br />

⎠<br />

10<br />

(4.23)<br />

The models can be applied in the frequency range from 2 – 6 GHz and for different antenna heights. The<br />

path-loss models have been summarized in Table 4-4, which either defines the variables of (4.23), or<br />

explicitly provides a full path loss formula. The free-space path loss, PL free , that is referred to in the table<br />

can be written as<br />

PL<br />

free<br />

= 20log10(<br />

d)<br />

+ 46.4 + 20log10(<br />

fc<br />

5.0)<br />

(4.24)<br />

The distribution of the shadow fading is log-normal, and the standard deviation for each scenario is given<br />

in the table.<br />

Frequency dependencies of <strong>WINNER</strong> path-loss models<br />

The path loss models shown in Table 4-4 are based on measured data obtained mainly at 2 and 5 GHz.<br />

These models have been extended to arbitrary frequencies in the range from 2 – 6 GHz with the aid of the<br />

path loss frequency dependencies defined below. Following various results from the open literature, as<br />

Page 43 (82)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!