16.03.2015 Views

WINNER II pdf - Final Report - Cept

WINNER II pdf - Final Report - Cept

WINNER II pdf - Final Report - Cept

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>WINNER</strong> <strong>II</strong> D1.1.2 V1.2<br />

4. Channel Models and Parameters<br />

In this section, we summarize all the channel models and parameters. The path loss models are mainly<br />

based on 5 GHz and 2 GHz measurements. However, the frequency bands are extended for 2 − 6 GHz<br />

range.<br />

It should be noted that the scenarios Indoor-to-Outdoor and Outdoor-to-Indoor have been combined and<br />

represented by a single channel model in this deliverable. This combining has been discussed in Part <strong>II</strong><br />

document of this report.<br />

4.1 Applicability<br />

4.1.1 Environment dependence<br />

Different radio-propagation environment would cause different radio-channel characteristics. Instead of<br />

attempt to parameterize environment directly (e.g. street widths, average building height etc.) <strong>WINNER</strong><br />

models are using (temporal and spatial) propagation parameters obtained from channel measurements in<br />

different environments. In this context, environments in which measurements are conducted to observe<br />

radio-channel characteristics are called propagation scenarios. For each scenario measured data is<br />

analyzed and complemented with results from literature to obtain scenario-specific parameters. After this<br />

point, same generic channel is used to model all scenarios, just by using different values of channel<br />

parameters.<br />

Usually, even for the same scenario, existence of LOS component substantially influences values of<br />

channel parameters. Regarding to this property, most <strong>WINNER</strong> scenarios are differentiating between<br />

LOS and NLOS conditions. To enable appropriate scenario modelling, transition between LOS and<br />

NLOS cases have to be described. For this purpose distance dependent probability of LOS is used in the<br />

model.<br />

4.1.2 Frequency dependence<br />

Dependence on carrier frequency in <strong>WINNER</strong> model is found in path-loss models. All the scenarios<br />

defined by <strong>WINNER</strong> support frequency dependent path-loss models valid for the ranges of 2 – 6 GHz.<br />

The path-loss models are based on measurements that are mainly conducted in 2 and 5 GHz frequency<br />

range. In addition the path-loss models are based on results from literature, like Okumura-Hata and other<br />

well-known models [OOK+68], [OTT+01], which have been extended to the desired frequency range.<br />

Path-loss frequency dependence has been considered in more detail in the paragraph 4.3.<br />

From <strong>WINNER</strong> measurement results and literature survey it was found that model parameters DS, AS<br />

and Ricean K-factor do not show significant frequency dependence [BHS05]. For that reason these<br />

parameters show only dependence on environment (scenario).<br />

For modelling of systems with time-division-duplex (TDD) all models are using same parameters for both<br />

uplink and downlink. If system is using different carriers for duplexing (FDD), then (additionally to path<br />

loss) random phases of scatterer contributions between UL and DL are modelled as independent.<br />

For the <strong>WINNER</strong> purposes it is required that channel model supports bandwidths up to 100 MHz.<br />

Following the approach described in [SV87] (for indoor propagation modelling) and further with SCME<br />

[BHS05] <strong>WINNER</strong> <strong>II</strong> model introduces intra-cluster delay spread as a mean to support 100 MHz<br />

bandwidth and to suppress frequency correlation. Instead of zero-delay-spread-cluster approach of Phase I<br />

model, the two strongest clusters with 20 multipath components (MPCs) are subdivided into 3 zero-delay<br />

sub-clusters. Thus we keep the total number of MPCs constant, but introduce four additional delay taps<br />

per scenario.<br />

4.2 Generation of Channel Coefficients<br />

This section gives general description of the channel coefficient generation procedure, depicted also in<br />

Figure 4-1. Steps of the procedure refer to parameter and model tables of Sections 4.2 to 4.4 give the<br />

minimum description of the system level channel model.<br />

Page 37 (82)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!