16.03.2015 Views

WINNER II pdf - Final Report - Cept

WINNER II pdf - Final Report - Cept

WINNER II pdf - Final Report - Cept

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>WINNER</strong> <strong>II</strong> D1.1.2 V1.2<br />

of the relative positions of the system elements, as well as vectored description of their movements<br />

(speeds). In general, positions (coordinates) of scatterers are unknown. Only exceptions are related to far<br />

cluster scatterers (FCS) that are actually positioned in the same coordinate system as radio-stations. In<br />

multi-link simulations spatial correlations of channel parameters are important. In order to establish<br />

correlations between links at system level the LSPs have been generated with the desired correlation<br />

properties. This has been described in the following subsection.<br />

3.3.1 Correlations between large scale parameters<br />

For single position of radio-stations (one link) we can describe inter-dependence of multiple control<br />

parameters (LSP) with correlation coefficient matrix. Correlations of LSPs that are observed in measured<br />

data are not reflected in joint power or probability distributions. Instead LSPs are estimated from<br />

marginal power distributions (independently for angles and delays), and necessary dependence is reestablished<br />

through cross-correlation measure:<br />

where<br />

Cxy<br />

is the cross-covariance of LS parameters x and y.<br />

xy<br />

=<br />

C<br />

C<br />

xx<br />

xy<br />

ρ , (3.4)<br />

At system level two types of correlations could be defined: a) between MSs being connected to the same<br />

BS and b) correlations of links from the same MS to multiple BSs (Figure 3-5). These correlations are<br />

mostly caused by some scatterers contributing to different links (similarity of the environment).<br />

C<br />

yy<br />

a) b)<br />

Figure 3-5 Links toward common station will exibit inter-correlations: a) fixed common station, b)<br />

mobile common station<br />

In the first case <strong>WINNER</strong> models are using exponential correlation functions to describe dependence of<br />

LSP changes over distance. In other words LSPs of two MSs links toward same BS would experience<br />

correlations that are proportional to their relative distance d MS . As a consequence correlation coefficient<br />

matrices for neighbouring links (for MSs at certain distance) are not independent and they also have to<br />

reflect observed correlations over the distance dimension:<br />

C<br />

( =<br />

( d<br />

)<br />

xy MS<br />

ρ<br />

xy<br />

dMS<br />

)<br />

, (3.5)<br />

CxxC<br />

yy<br />

For this reason elements of link cross-correlations coefficient matrix should reflect exponential decay<br />

with distance, as shown in Figure 3-6<br />

Page 30 (82)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!