WINNER II pdf - Final Report - Cept
WINNER II pdf - Final Report - Cept
WINNER II pdf - Final Report - Cept
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>WINNER</strong> <strong>II</strong> D1.1.2 V1.2<br />
of the relative positions of the system elements, as well as vectored description of their movements<br />
(speeds). In general, positions (coordinates) of scatterers are unknown. Only exceptions are related to far<br />
cluster scatterers (FCS) that are actually positioned in the same coordinate system as radio-stations. In<br />
multi-link simulations spatial correlations of channel parameters are important. In order to establish<br />
correlations between links at system level the LSPs have been generated with the desired correlation<br />
properties. This has been described in the following subsection.<br />
3.3.1 Correlations between large scale parameters<br />
For single position of radio-stations (one link) we can describe inter-dependence of multiple control<br />
parameters (LSP) with correlation coefficient matrix. Correlations of LSPs that are observed in measured<br />
data are not reflected in joint power or probability distributions. Instead LSPs are estimated from<br />
marginal power distributions (independently for angles and delays), and necessary dependence is reestablished<br />
through cross-correlation measure:<br />
where<br />
Cxy<br />
is the cross-covariance of LS parameters x and y.<br />
xy<br />
=<br />
C<br />
C<br />
xx<br />
xy<br />
ρ , (3.4)<br />
At system level two types of correlations could be defined: a) between MSs being connected to the same<br />
BS and b) correlations of links from the same MS to multiple BSs (Figure 3-5). These correlations are<br />
mostly caused by some scatterers contributing to different links (similarity of the environment).<br />
C<br />
yy<br />
a) b)<br />
Figure 3-5 Links toward common station will exibit inter-correlations: a) fixed common station, b)<br />
mobile common station<br />
In the first case <strong>WINNER</strong> models are using exponential correlation functions to describe dependence of<br />
LSP changes over distance. In other words LSPs of two MSs links toward same BS would experience<br />
correlations that are proportional to their relative distance d MS . As a consequence correlation coefficient<br />
matrices for neighbouring links (for MSs at certain distance) are not independent and they also have to<br />
reflect observed correlations over the distance dimension:<br />
C<br />
( =<br />
( d<br />
)<br />
xy MS<br />
ρ<br />
xy<br />
dMS<br />
)<br />
, (3.5)<br />
CxxC<br />
yy<br />
For this reason elements of link cross-correlations coefficient matrix should reflect exponential decay<br />
with distance, as shown in Figure 3-6<br />
Page 30 (82)