Final report on link level and system level channel models - Winner
Final report on link level and system level channel models - Winner
Final report on link level and system level channel models - Winner
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
WINNER D5.4 v. 1.4<br />
Sampling frequency 320 MHz at Tx <strong>and</strong> Rx<br />
Propagati<strong>on</strong> delay resoluti<strong>on</strong><br />
4.17 ns (1/b<strong>and</strong>width)<br />
Impulse resp<strong>on</strong>se length 0.8 µs – 25.6 µs adjustable to the<br />
envir<strong>on</strong>ment<br />
RF sensitivity<br />
Max. meas. data storage rate<br />
-90 dBm<br />
2x160 Mbytes/s<br />
The RUSK Channel Sounder uses an excitati<strong>on</strong> signal c<strong>on</strong>cept, which is known as the “periodic multisine<br />
signal”. This approach is well known from frequency domain <strong>system</strong> identificati<strong>on</strong> in measurement<br />
engineering. In communicati<strong>on</strong> engineering teRMS this signal may be called a multicarrier spread<br />
spectrum signal (MCSSS). Regarding the overall spectral shape, the main advantage of multicarrier<br />
spread spectrum signal (MCSSS) is its “brickwall-type” shape which allows c<strong>on</strong>centrating the signal<br />
energy exactly to the b<strong>and</strong> of interest. This can even be multiple b<strong>and</strong>s when spectral magnitudes are set<br />
to zero. One example applicati<strong>on</strong> is FDD sounding, which means that the sounder simultaneously excites<br />
both the up- <strong>and</strong> the down-<strong>link</strong> b<strong>and</strong>. Figure 5.3 presents the MCSSS in time (top row, left) <strong>and</strong> frequency<br />
domain (top row, right).<br />
Figure 5.3: Broadb<strong>and</strong> multicarrier spread spectrum signal (MCSSS) magnitude in the time <strong>and</strong><br />
frequency domain (top row) <strong>and</strong> estimated CIR <strong>and</strong> received signal spectrum (bottom row).<br />
In case of multipath transmissi<strong>on</strong>, the power spectrum of the received signal is shaped by frequency<br />
selective fading as shown for example in Figure 5.3 (bottom row, right). Furthermore the impulse<br />
resp<strong>on</strong>se (bottom row, left), which would result from inverse Fourier transform of frequency resp<strong>on</strong>se, is<br />
shown in the same figure.<br />
A MIMO <strong>channel</strong> sounder measures the <strong>channel</strong> resp<strong>on</strong>se matrix between all M Tx antennas at the transmit<br />
side <strong>and</strong> all M Rx antennas at the receiver side. This could be carried out by applying a parallel multiple<br />
<strong>channel</strong> transmitter <strong>and</strong> receiver. However, true parallel <strong>system</strong>s not <strong>on</strong>ly are extremely expensive. They<br />
are also inflexible (when c<strong>on</strong>sidering changing the number of antenna <strong>channel</strong>s) <strong>and</strong> susceptible to phase<br />
drift errors. Also parallel operati<strong>on</strong> of the transmitter <strong>channel</strong>s would cause specific problems since the<br />
M Tx transmitted signals have to be separated at the receiver. A much more suitable sounder architecture is<br />
based <strong>on</strong> switched antenna access. A switched antenna sounder c<strong>on</strong>tains <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong>e physical transmitter <strong>and</strong><br />
receiver <strong>channel</strong>. Only the antennas <strong>and</strong> the switching <strong>channel</strong>s are parallel. This reduces the sensitivity to<br />
<strong>channel</strong> imbalance.<br />
Figure 5.4 shows the switching time frame of a sequential MIMO sounder using antenna arrays at both<br />
sides of the <strong>link</strong>, which is applied in the RUSK MIMO Channel Sounder. Any rectangle block in the<br />
Page 59 (167)