16.03.2015 Views

Final report on link level and system level channel models - Winner

Final report on link level and system level channel models - Winner

Final report on link level and system level channel models - Winner

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

WINNER D5.4 v. 1.4<br />

When comparing the shadow fading autocorrelati<strong>on</strong>, we got the following results for the autocorrelati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

of the over-all shadowing: For 2.45 GHz the correlati<strong>on</strong> distance was approximately 330 m <strong>and</strong> for the<br />

5.25 GHz it was approximately 320 m. Note that the route used for the comparis<strong>on</strong> was the <strong>on</strong>e with the<br />

greatest correlati<strong>on</strong> distance.<br />

5.6.9.2 Rms-delay spread<br />

The RMS delay spread is shown in the Table 5.46 for the centre-frequencies 2.45 <strong>and</strong> 5.25 GHz. The<br />

difference is c<strong>on</strong>siderable. For 2.45 GHz the mean delay spread for LOS is 35 % <strong>and</strong> for NLOS 80 %<br />

higher. Same trend can be found in the references cited in Secti<strong>on</strong> 5.5.<br />

Table 5.46: Rms-delay spread percentiles at 2.45 <strong>and</strong> 5.25 GHz.<br />

Rms delay spread<br />

(ns)<br />

LOS<br />

NLOS<br />

2 GHz 5 GHz 2 GHz 5 GHz<br />

10% 6.4 2.5 12.3 4.3<br />

50% 22.7 15.4 61.0 37.1<br />

90% 64.0 84.4 130.0 89.5<br />

mean 30.2 36.8 69.0 42.1<br />

Page 134 (167)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!