16.03.2015 Views

Final report on link level and system level channel models - Winner

Final report on link level and system level channel models - Winner

Final report on link level and system level channel models - Winner

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WINNER D5.4 v. 1.4<br />

When adjusting the PL curves of the <strong>models</strong> to closely follow the measured over-all curve, the following<br />

acti<strong>on</strong>s were needed:<br />

1. Cost231-Hata: Subtract 15 dB <strong>and</strong> apply h BS = 50 m (instead of the 25 m). I.e. use an effective<br />

BS antenna height h BS + 25 m.<br />

2. Erceg: Apply h BS = 60 m. I.e. use an effective BS antenna height h BS + 35 m.<br />

Both <strong>models</strong> could be used, after these modificati<strong>on</strong>s. The subtracti<strong>on</strong> of 15 dB needed with the<br />

COST231-Hata model is caused by the fact that the model is not originally planned for rural<br />

envir<strong>on</strong>ments, but for urban <strong>and</strong> suburban envir<strong>on</strong>ments.<br />

5.6.2 Power-delay profile<br />

5.6.2.1 Scenario A1<br />

The PDP at a corridor to corridor envir<strong>on</strong>ment is modelled as a decaying exp<strong>on</strong>ential. The measured PDP<br />

has a spike that can be identified coming due to a reflecti<strong>on</strong> from the end of the corridor, see Secti<strong>on</strong><br />

5.4.7.1. In our model we have neglected it, because the delay of the spike depends <strong>on</strong> the locati<strong>on</strong> of the<br />

BS in the corridor. The c<strong>on</strong>stants of the decay have been determined in the same paragraph. It is relatively<br />

easy to extend the model to include the spike, when the locati<strong>on</strong> of the BS is fixed. However, it is not<br />

included in the current model. This is justified by the model simplicity <strong>and</strong> also the relative low <strong>level</strong> of<br />

the measured spike. For the corridor to room envir<strong>on</strong>ment the model fits quite well in the exp<strong>on</strong>ential<br />

model.<br />

5.6.2.2 Scenario B5a<br />

The power-delay profile (of all paths except the direct) is set as exp<strong>on</strong>ential, based <strong>on</strong> the results in<br />

[OBL+02] <strong>and</strong> [SCK05].<br />

5.6.2.3 Scenario B5b<br />

The power-delay profile (of all paths except the direct) is set as exp<strong>on</strong>ential, based <strong>on</strong> the results in<br />

[SMI+00]. A per-path shadow fading of 3 dB is used to obtain some variati<strong>on</strong> in the impulse resp<strong>on</strong>ses.<br />

5.6.3 Delay spread<br />

5.6.3.1 Scenario B5a<br />

The RMS-delay-spread is set to 40 ns, based <strong>on</strong> [PT00]. In order to have a valid model, it requires beamwidths<br />

comparable to those employed in [PT00].<br />

5.6.3.2 Scenario B5b<br />

Based <strong>on</strong> the delay-spread formula in [MAS02] i.e.<br />

s<br />

[ ns] exp( β )<br />

= (5.72)<br />

we select the delay spread to be 30 ns when the path loss is less than 85 dB, 110 ns when the path loss is<br />

between 85 dB <strong>and</strong> 110 dB, <strong>and</strong> finally 380 ns when the path loss is greater than 110 dB. With these<br />

settings the delay-spread used here is a factor 40%-156% of the delay-spread formula of [MAS02] for<br />

path losses up to 137 dB. We call these path-loss intervals range1, range2 <strong>and</strong> range3 <strong>and</strong> different<br />

clustered-delay line <strong>models</strong> will be provided for the three cases.<br />

5.6.3.3 Scenario C1<br />

In the C1 LOS suburban scenario we model the PDP with a single exp<strong>on</strong>ential. It can be seen that another<br />

exp<strong>on</strong>ential cluster could be included in the PDP. For the same reas<strong>on</strong> as in the scenario A1 it was<br />

decided to be neglected.<br />

5.6.3.4 Scenario D1<br />

In the D1 scenario the PDP is best modelled with two decaying exp<strong>on</strong>entials in both LOS <strong>and</strong> NLOS<br />

propagati<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s, i.e. with a dual-slope model. However, also now we model the PDP was decided<br />

to be modelled with a single exp<strong>on</strong>ential in both cases. In the LOS c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s the first part is modelled<br />

with <strong>on</strong>e spike <strong>and</strong> the sec<strong>on</strong>d part with an exp<strong>on</strong>ential.<br />

In the NLOS c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s a single slope model is fitted to the measured PDP for simplicity. The fitting is<br />

performed to preserve the modelled RMS-delay spread equal to the measured <strong>on</strong>e.<br />

PL dB<br />

Page 131 (167)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!