16.03.2015 Views

Final report on link level and system level channel models - Winner

Final report on link level and system level channel models - Winner

Final report on link level and system level channel models - Winner

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WINNER D5.4 v. 1.4<br />

model can be used from 100 m to 10 km, although originally the model has been defined for distances<br />

greater than 1 km. The modified Erceg model 1 could be applied as well.<br />

5.6.1.5.3 Unified model<br />

For the overall path-loss in the D1 scenario we get from measurements the formula<br />

PL(d) = 50.4 + 25.8 log 10 (d) (5.69)<br />

The drawback of this model is that it is based <strong>on</strong> relatively few measurements. In additi<strong>on</strong> the LOS<br />

c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> disappeared after quite a small distance from the BS. This depends e.g. <strong>on</strong> the fact that the BSs<br />

were located slightly off the roads for practical reas<strong>on</strong>s. Real BS:s would be located probably in more<br />

beneficial way.<br />

The unified model can be formed also by combining the LOS model <strong>and</strong> the NLOS model using the LOS<br />

probability p LOS (d):<br />

PL(d) = p LOS (d) PL LOS (d) + [1- p LOS (d)] PL NLOS (d) (5.70)<br />

where d is the distance between MS <strong>and</strong> BS. p LOS will be defined in Secti<strong>on</strong> 5.6.1.5.4<br />

The drawback of this model is that the p LOS used here is <strong>on</strong>ly theoretical <strong>on</strong>e. However, it gives<br />

reas<strong>on</strong>able results, <strong>and</strong> is used therefore as basis of comparis<strong>on</strong> of our model <strong>and</strong> the <strong>models</strong> found in the<br />

literature.<br />

5.6.1.5.4 Probability of LOS model<br />

Probability of LOS in the D1 scenario is proposed to be modelled with an exp<strong>on</strong>ential functi<strong>on</strong><br />

P LOS<br />

d<br />

( d)<br />

= exp( − )<br />

(5.71)<br />

where d is the distance between the BS <strong>and</strong> the MS <strong>and</strong> d 0 is the c<strong>on</strong>stant defining the steepness of the<br />

exp<strong>on</strong>ential decay.<br />

Default value for d 0<br />

is proposed to be 1 km. The reas<strong>on</strong> for proposing this model is the following: It is<br />

very near the model for LOS probability defined in [SCM] at small distances. In additi<strong>on</strong> it does not go to<br />

zero at the cell boundary, so that it can be used in the <strong>system</strong>-<strong>level</strong> modelling of interference.<br />

5.6.1.5.5 Model comparis<strong>on</strong><br />

In the figure below there are the measurement based PL curves obtained in the WINNER project<br />

compared to some well-known PL <strong>models</strong> from the literature. In additi<strong>on</strong> there is the free-space loss<br />

curve. In the comparis<strong>on</strong> the base stati<strong>on</strong> antenna height was 24.5 m; mobile antenna height was the<br />

default value 1.7 m.<br />

d 0<br />

Figure 5.89: Comparis<strong>on</strong> of <strong>channel</strong> <strong>models</strong> for a rural envir<strong>on</strong>ment.<br />

Page 130 (167)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!