16.03.2015 Views

Final report on link level and system level channel models - Winner

Final report on link level and system level channel models - Winner

Final report on link level and system level channel models - Winner

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WINNER D5.4 v. 1.4<br />

5.5.6 Scenario D1<br />

5.5.6.1 Path-loss<br />

5.5.6.1.1 LOS path-loss<br />

The basic theoretical equati<strong>on</strong> for LOS path-loss is<br />

where d is the distance between BS <strong>and</strong> MS <strong>and</strong> A <strong>and</strong> B are c<strong>on</strong>stants.<br />

PL = A + B*log 10 (d) (5.45)<br />

Normally, A <strong>and</strong> B are near the free-space values. For example, in our measurements at 5.25 GHz the<br />

values were: A = 41.8 <strong>and</strong> B = 22.<br />

The model in (5.34) can be extended until so called break-point distance, which depends <strong>on</strong> the wavelength<br />

? <strong>and</strong> base stati<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> mobile stati<strong>on</strong> antenna heights, h BS <strong>and</strong> h MS respectively [28].<br />

d BP = 4 · h BS · h MS / ? (5.46)<br />

where h BS is the height of the base stati<strong>on</strong>, h MS is the height of the mobile stati<strong>on</strong>, <strong>and</strong> ? is the wave length<br />

at f c .<br />

After this break-point, the loss is proporti<strong>on</strong>al to another, greater path-loss exp<strong>on</strong>ent. By flat earth theory,<br />

this exp<strong>on</strong>ent should be 4, but in practice it can be also greater. The model is based <strong>on</strong> the assumpti<strong>on</strong><br />

about two rays arriving at the receiver antenna, <strong>on</strong>e direct ray, the other <strong>on</strong>e reflected from the flat earth.<br />

This model is also called two-ray model.<br />

The model can be written in the form [28]:<br />

PL = A + B log 10 (d), d d BP (5.48)<br />

where C = 10 n, <strong>and</strong> n is the path-loss exp<strong>on</strong>ent for the distances greater than the break-point distance.<br />

Other c<strong>on</strong>stants are as given above.<br />

About LOS path-loss, there is a statement in [13] about trials in an rural envir<strong>on</strong>ment that show that the<br />

two-ray model woks well there. For the urban microcellular envir<strong>on</strong>ment it has been modified slightly to<br />

make it agree with the measurement results. Measurements for the two-ray modeling were <str<strong>on</strong>g>report</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed at 1.9<br />

GHz <strong>and</strong> cover the range of 0 to 1800 m with antenna heights of 6 m (BS) <strong>and</strong> 1.7 m (MS). With these<br />

values the distance of 1800 m is far bey<strong>on</strong>d the break-point distance.<br />

Also, [AlPM02] shows results for LOS c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s, where the path-loss exp<strong>on</strong>ent is near 2 with st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

deviati<strong>on</strong> of 6.9 dB. The behavior of the path loss is thus like in free-space. The envir<strong>on</strong>ment is called<br />

residential. It can be classified also suburban. Measurements were c<strong>on</strong>ducted using 100 MHz b<strong>and</strong>width.<br />

For NLOS c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s, the path-loss exp<strong>on</strong>ent was 3.5 <strong>and</strong> the st<strong>and</strong>ard deviati<strong>on</strong> was 9.5 dB.<br />

In the reference [Zha02], based <strong>on</strong> measurements performed at 5.3 GHz with RF BW 30 MHz, <strong>and</strong> omnidirecti<strong>on</strong>al<br />

antennas, the path-loss <strong>models</strong>, excess delay <strong>and</strong> RMS delay-spread statistical values were<br />

obtained. In the rural envir<strong>on</strong>ments, the transmitter was placed at a hill with a mast, the total height was<br />

55 m from ground <strong>level</strong>, the height of the mobile stati<strong>on</strong> was 2.5 m <strong>on</strong> top of a car. The path-loss equati<strong>on</strong><br />

is expressed as follows:<br />

5.5.6.1.2 NLOS path-loss<br />

PL ( dB) = 21.8 + 33log<br />

10<br />

( d ) , σ = 3. 7 dB (5.49)<br />

The model has been based partly <strong>on</strong> measurements <strong>and</strong> partly <strong>on</strong> literature. There are numerous path-loss<br />

<strong>models</strong> for lower frequencies than 5 GHz, <strong>and</strong> especially for urban <strong>and</strong> suburban envir<strong>on</strong>ments. For the<br />

rural envir<strong>on</strong>ment at 5 GHz there are not many results available. One alternative is to use results of lower<br />

frequencies, e.g. 2 GHz <strong>and</strong> translate them to 5 GHz. This can be justified with results presented in the<br />

paragraph 5.5.6.1.4, which show that the path-loss properties at 2 <strong>and</strong> 6 GHz are closely related. Mean<br />

difference was found to be 8.1 dB, when the difference due to the free-space losses should be 9.7 dB.<br />

Although the results were measured in an urban envir<strong>on</strong>ment, they suggest that the rural 2 GHz path-loss<br />

model can be c<strong>on</strong>verted to 5 GHz by increasing the path loss with the difference in the free-space losses.<br />

One potential <strong>channel</strong> model for the D1 scenario is the COST-231-Hata model [26] that is c<strong>on</strong>verted for 5<br />

GHz. COST-231-Hata model for sub-urban envir<strong>on</strong>ment is<br />

d<br />

PL = ( 44.9 − 6.55log10 ( hBS<br />

))log10<br />

( ) + 45.5 + (35.46−1.1h<br />

MS<br />

)log10(<br />

f<br />

c<br />

) −13.82log10<br />

( hBS<br />

) + 0. 7hMS<br />

(5.50)<br />

1000<br />

where<br />

h BS = the height of the base stati<strong>on</strong><br />

h MS = the height of the mobile stati<strong>on</strong> (m)<br />

f c = the centre-frequency (MHz)<br />

Page 125 (167)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!