Preface

82
2- That the exclusion of Assan Sarr a Biological son of the lat Pa Modou
Sarr is wrong in law specifically judging from the reason given for the
said exclusion which were only speculation and not base on any factual
evidence.
3- That the distribution made by the Cadi among the inheritors was wrong
in law and against the rules of natural justice.
He sought the following from the appeal panel:
1- That the Cadis decision made on the 10 th day august, 2010 be set aside
and the order to exclude Assan Sarr be set aside.
2- That an order be made to include Assan Sarr in respect of the distribution
of the properties of the late Pa Modou Sarr looking into consideration in
the monitory aspect Assan Sarr was not denied his share.
3- Any further order that the honorable Court deems fit.
In the sitting dated 9th / 12/ 2010 before Cadi Appeal Panel, Mr. Ebrima
Sarr appeared before the Court with a letter of power of attorney dated 10 th /11/
2010 to represent Assan Sarr before the panel in the presence of his lawyer Mr.
Edrisa M. Sisoh.
The respondent on the other hand appeared before the Court with her
counsel Mr. Borry Touray while the others were absent. In that sitting the lawyer
Sisoho opened his defense before the Court and submitted as follows:
That I have received the record of the lower Court but that record does not
contain our complaint, as it was cleared that the lower Court has distributed that
cash money to all beneficiaries including my client he in fact received his right
share in full. But in the estate there are three compounds but the said compounds