15.03.2015 Views

Preface

Preface

Preface

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

73<br />

This is an appeal against the decision of Budung Cadi Court between Alieu<br />

Barry plaintiff /appellant and Fatoumata Daffey Defendant respondent.<br />

The gist of the appeal briefly is that the appellant instituted an action against<br />

the respondent his {former wife} after narrating how their marital life was up to<br />

the time of divorce and subsequent delivery of baby girl by the respondent.<br />

The appellant basically claimed 2 things:<br />

1. Confirming paternity of the baby girl delivered by the respondent to him.<br />

2. Sustaining the name he chose for the baby girl delivered by the respondent<br />

as Naffy Barry see page 1 of the lower Court translated copy.<br />

The defendant / respondent re-acting to the claim of the appellant narrated<br />

her own story, and the relevant portion for the purpose of this appeal is that the<br />

appellant deserted her and initially rejected the pregnancy of the said baby girl i.e<br />

Naffy Barry but latter on accepted the pregnancy and named the Baby girl Naffy<br />

Barry. Due to disagreement between the appellant and the respondent parent<br />

regarding maintenance of the pregnancy, the respondent parent changed the name<br />

of Naffy Barry to Mariama Barry, the lower Court at the conclusion of the hearing,<br />

gave judgment inter-alia confirming the paternity of Naffy Barry to the appellant<br />

and ordered him to pay D4,500.00 as arrears of maintenance of his pregnancy<br />

to the respondent as well as paying D300 monthly for maintenance of his daughter<br />

Naffy Barry.<br />

Dissatisfied with the decision of the lower Court, the appellant appealed to<br />

this Honorable Court and filed 4 ground of appeal along with 2 prayers as follow:-<br />

1. That the order made by the Cadi that the appellant should pay the respondent<br />

the sum of D4, 500.00 as maintenance is wrong because the Cadi fail to<br />

consider the means of the appellant

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!