15.03.2015 Views

Preface

Preface

Preface

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

60<br />

UIN THE HIGH COURT OF THE GAMBIA<br />

UIN THE CADI APPEALS PANE<br />

UHOLDEN AT BANJUL<br />

APPEAL NO. AP/ 4/2011<br />

BETWEEN:<br />

FATOU FAYE…………………………………………………….APPELLANT<br />

AND:<br />

SIRANDOU FAYE & 3 OTHERS……………………….….RESPONDENTS<br />

{Before: Justice Omar A. Secka Chairman, Justice A. S. Usman, Alh. Ousman Jah<br />

Panelist and Alh. Masohna Kah Panelist at Banjul on Tuesday, March 8, 2011}<br />

UPRINCIPLES:<br />

1. For a claim to be valid in Islamic law trial it must satisfy two basic<br />

conditions, to wit, (a) the subject matter must be tangible and identifiable<br />

and (b) must be supported with a detailed explanation of how it accrued.<br />

2. The plaintiff’s statement of claim under Islamic law however strong and<br />

convincing cannot constitute evidence. Evidence must be led to support. It’s<br />

akin to pleadings in common law system where same is deemed abandoned<br />

if no evidence is led on it.<br />

3. A trial court must decide a case on the strength of legal evidence adduced<br />

before it and where it has failed to follow this course, as it is in the instant<br />

case, an appeal court will have no option than to interfere with its decision.<br />

4. What distinguishes a Cadi from other stakeholders in the arena of dispute<br />

settlement is the evidence upon which his decisions are based and founded.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!