Preface

More documents

Recommendations

Info

48 UIN THE HIGH COURT OF THE GAMBIA UIN THE CADI APPEALS PANE UHOLDEN AT BANJUL APPEAL NO. AP/16/2010 BETWEEN: MARYAM CAMARA …………………………………..…………APPELLANT AND: YOROO CAMAR…………………………………...…..……….RESPONDENT {Before: Justice Omar A. Secka Chairman, Justice A. S. Usman, Alh. Ousman Jah Panelist and Alh. Masohna Kah Panelist at Banjul on Tuesday, January 31, 2011} UPRINCIPLES: 1. Even though The Cadi Appeals Panel by section 137 A (6) of the 1997 Constitution of the Gambia, has jurisdiction to entertain appeals from judgments of the District Courts where Sharia law is involved, that jurisdiction does not extend to entertaining appeals from the decisions of the said tribunals where those decisions were founded on criminal trials. 2. By section 26 of the District Tribunals Act Cap. 6:03 Vol. II Laws of the Gambia only a party to the proceedings of a District Tribunal, who is aggrieved, can appeal against its decisions to the Cadi Appeals Panel where Sharia law is involved. 3. Where a person (who is not a party) has an interest in a case that is pending before a court, the appropriate thing to do is to apply for joinder under the relevant rules of the court to enable him or her to partake in its proceedings.
49 The appellant, having not been so joined, is incompetent to prosecute the instant appeal and the Panel has no better option than to strike out same. JUDGMENT Written and delivered by Justice A. S. Usman This is an appeal against the decision of the District Court Tribunal of Jarra (hereinafter referred to in this judgment as the lower court) dated 13/11/2010. The respondent, as plaintiff in the lower court sued the defendant one Momodou Yahya Kanteh for taking away his wife without his knowledge. The claim before the lower court as could be discerned from the evidence of the respondent contained on pages 1-4 of the printed record of proceedings of the lower court placed before this panel is that, the defendant who was his next door neighbour at Burufut and who on some occasions visited him and sought for a traditional treatment for a sickness he was suffering from, was in love affairs with his wife Maryama Camara the appellant in this case. The said defendant, the respondent at the lower court narrated further, one day came to his house in the night thinking that he was away to Birikama with the aim of meeting his wife; the appellant herein but surprisingly saw him laying on the bed. He gave the defendant a hot chase but the defendant managed to escape. The following day, the defendant’s father begged the respondent and apologized on his behalf. Despite this, the defendant did not stop his atrocities against his wife but courageously thereafter, decided to camp and in fact did camp the appellant in a room at Farato which arrears of rent totaling D600 he was made to settle when he went to bring her to Base on the request of her father for admonition in company of one Malado Camara; a germane sister to the appellant and pw2 on page 5 of the record of the lower court. Even at Base, the defendant still ambushed her and camped her in the
Page 2 and 3: 2 PREFACE In the name of God, the M
Page 4 and 5: 4 CONTENTS S/No. Contents Pages 1.
Page 6 and 7: 6 7. Yorro Fatty Vs Lama Bah AP/17/
Page 8 and 9: 8 orders. Sheikh Hydara Vs Yandeh N
Page 10 and 11: 10 18. PRACTICE & PROCEDURE: Burden
Page 12 and 13: 12 10. Almustasfa Min Ilmil Usul By
Page 14 and 15: 14 4. Mafolatu Vs Usain Akanbi Ita
Page 16 and 17: 16 UIN THE HIGH COURT OF THE GAMBIA
Page 20 and 21: 20 according to the principles of S
Page 22 and 23: 22 4. The residue of an estate alwa
Page 24 and 25: 24 and she was very small so she wa
Page 26 and 27: 26 Secondly, we accepted the decisi
Page 28 and 29: 28 Musa Sabily shall have D112962.5
Page 30 and 31: 30 5. Evidence is invalidated if sh
Page 32 and 33: 32 disputing the right of these peo
Page 34 and 35: 34 estate among his heirs, this pro
Page 36 and 37: 36 This Panel has gone through the
Page 38 and 39: 38 Shares: Share: 1. 10 7 27 D175,0
Page 40 and 41: 40 …………………………
Page 42 and 43: 42 at Street 45 Stanley Banjul belo
Page 44 and 45: 44 “I was called there in the cou
Page 46 and 47: 46 About the submission by the appe
Page 50 and 51: 50 house of one Kebba Kebbeh at San
Page 52 and 53: 52 a while and satisfy itself on wh
Page 54 and 55: 54 From the totality of the foregoi
Page 56 and 57: 56 for joinder as an interested par
Page 58 and 59: 58 the rate of D8,250.00 and D25.00
Page 62 and 63: 62 The claimant’s oath in (c) and
Page 64 and 65: 64 Islam to exclude her from the va
Page 66 and 67: 66 of the subject matter of the cla
Page 68 and 69: 68 The above issues were not proved
Page 70 and 71: 70 how well conducted. The non-comp
Page 74 and 75: 74 2. That the change of name was w
Page 76 and 77: 76 she confirmed what the appellant
Page 78 and 79: 78 On this note, we hereby declared
Page 80 and 81: 80 JUDGMENT Written & delivered by
Page 82 and 83: 82 2- That the exclusion of Assan S
Page 84 and 85: 84 4- That if the appeals Court wil
Page 86 and 87: 86 Mr. Ousman Sarr (paternal brothe
Page 88 and 89: 88 Rules 2010 which states that: Su
Page 90 and 91: 90 stripes, and reject their testim
Page 92 and 93: 92 allegation as stated in the Hadi
Page 94 and 95: 94 guided by their provisions with
Page 96 and 97: 96 properties one in Allen street o
Page 98 and 99:
98 the appellant. As such the appli
Page 100 and 101:
100 I find no difficulty in resolvi
Page 102 and 103:
102 same way other cases are commen
Page 104 and 105:
104 '' Under Islamic Law, the subje
Page 106 and 107:
106 R. 77 (4) Any distribution of a
Page 108 and 109:
108 single witness was called in th
Page 110 and 111:
110 before judgment is entered agai
Page 112 and 113:
112 A judge shall on no account rel
Page 114 and 115:
114 these primary sources of Islami
Page 116 and 117:
116 same lower court (Principal Cad
Page 118 and 119:
118 4. The appellant being pregnant
Page 120 and 121:
120 that she was not given the oppo
Page 122 and 123:
122 their marriage was done by the
Page 124 and 125:
124 (c) That when the appellant was
Page 126 and 127:
126 This obligation is however deem
Page 128 and 129:
128 UIN THE HIGH COURT OF THE GAMBI
Page 130 and 131:
130 shall be filed within thirty da
Page 132 and 133:
132 4. The fact that the appellant
Page 134 and 135:
134 1. Fatou Dembajang- 4 years 2.
Page 136 and 137:
136 1. Transfer the right of custod
Page 138 and 139:
138 subsisting marriage between me
Page 140 and 141:
140 At this juncture we requested t
Page 142 and 143:
142 cover and having observed what
Page 144 and 145:
144 reverted to Christianity, in th
Page 146 and 147:
146 Pursuant to section 137A (6) of
Page 148 and 149:
148 3. The applicants violated the
Page 150 and 151:
150 ……….……..…..……
Page 152 and 153:
152 clearly defined and limited the
Page 154 and 155:
154 But at the same time if the sai
Page 156 and 157:
156 Islamic Law. His interest in th
Page 158 and 159:
158 contradict the provision of Sha
Page 160 and 161:
160 ISSUE NO. 1 (Whether or not the
Page 162 and 163:
162 before Banjul Cadi Court in the
Page 164 and 165:
164 ''Two conditions are essential
Page 166 and 167:
166 the court particularly the dist
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
172 This is an appeal against the j
Page 174 and 175:
174 For the second witness Mr. Lami
Page 176 and 177:
176 built up together there is a th
Page 178 and 179:
178 1. Whether it took place on 22
Page 180 and 181:
180 Meaning: reconciliation is perm
Page 182 and 183:
182 3. Those who have no course yet
Page 184:
184 ……….……..…..……
show all

Preface

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?