Preface
Preface Preface
110 before judgment is entered against him or that whether or he had more witnesses to call. If Al-Izar was not done or done after the decision the whole proceedings becomes a nullity” Despite the devastating consequences which result in rendering the whole proceeding of a court void the lower court did not apply it in the instant case. STEP 6 The next and last step is judgment of the court. Although there is no unanimous and one single style of writing judgment yet it is generally believed that there are some salient points that are expected to be reflected in every judgment. They include: 1. The historical background or origin of the matter the parties, the claim and cause of action and the counter claim if any. 2. Analysis a d valuation of the evidence adduced. 3. The submissions of plaintiff or his counsel and submissions of the defendant or his counsel. Logical or scientific of both submissions. 4. The result of the analysis and conclusion of the court substantiated with authorities. 5. The decision or order of the court. 6. Right of appeal. Finally, the judgment of the lower court is devoid of many of the above points. For this reason and many more explained above as part of treating this issue I have no option than to resolve the issue in favour of non substantial compliance of the lower court’s proceedings with the rules of procedure.
111 Issue no.2 on whether or not the judgment of the court has satisfied the basic requirements of a valid judgment under the law and Sharia. First and fourth grounds of appeal attacked the judgment of the lower court as being wrong both in law and Sharia but no proper particulars of error or wrong was given by the appellant yet it is the duty of this court to examine the whole proceedings of the lower court including the judgment with a view to determining their compliance or otherwise with both substantive and adjectival laws. What a judgment shall contain was spelt out by rules of practice and procedure of the lower court. Order X1V rule 79 of the Cadi Courts Civil Procedure Rules has made it a mandatory requirement for a valid judgment to contain the principles of law and evidences proffered before the court to form the basis upon which the judgment must be grounded. The order reads thus: Ord. R. 79. The judgment of the court shall contain principles and evidences on which such decisions are grounded. Judgment is a court's final determination of the rights and obligation of the parties in a case, it includes an equitable decree and any order from which an appeal lies. Under Islamic law it necessarily affirms or denies that such a duty or such liability rests upon the person against whom the aid of the law is invoked. As earlier stated the ingredients which are indispensable for a valid judgment under Sharia and which the absence of any one of them renders the judgment invalid are six in number, namely: ''The judge, the plaintiff, the defendant, the subject matter in dispute and the applicable law leading to the judgment ( Qur'an or Sunnah or the Consensus) and lastly the procedure which such judgment has attained''
- Page 60 and 61: 60 UIN THE HIGH COURT OF THE GAMBIA
- Page 62 and 63: 62 The claimant’s oath in (c) and
- Page 64 and 65: 64 Islam to exclude her from the va
- Page 66 and 67: 66 of the subject matter of the cla
- Page 68 and 69: 68 The above issues were not proved
- Page 70 and 71: 70 how well conducted. The non-comp
- Page 72 and 73: 72 UIN THE HIGH COURT OF THE GAMBIA
- Page 74 and 75: 74 2. That the change of name was w
- Page 76 and 77: 76 she confirmed what the appellant
- Page 78 and 79: 78 On this note, we hereby declared
- Page 80 and 81: 80 JUDGMENT Written & delivered by
- Page 82 and 83: 82 2- That the exclusion of Assan S
- Page 84 and 85: 84 4- That if the appeals Court wil
- Page 86 and 87: 86 Mr. Ousman Sarr (paternal brothe
- Page 88 and 89: 88 Rules 2010 which states that: Su
- Page 90 and 91: 90 stripes, and reject their testim
- Page 92 and 93: 92 allegation as stated in the Hadi
- Page 94 and 95: 94 guided by their provisions with
- Page 96 and 97: 96 properties one in Allen street o
- Page 98 and 99: 98 the appellant. As such the appli
- Page 100 and 101: 100 I find no difficulty in resolvi
- Page 102 and 103: 102 same way other cases are commen
- Page 104 and 105: 104 '' Under Islamic Law, the subje
- Page 106 and 107: 106 R. 77 (4) Any distribution of a
- Page 108 and 109: 108 single witness was called in th
- Page 112 and 113: 112 A judge shall on no account rel
- Page 114 and 115: 114 these primary sources of Islami
- Page 116 and 117: 116 same lower court (Principal Cad
- Page 118 and 119: 118 4. The appellant being pregnant
- Page 120 and 121: 120 that she was not given the oppo
- Page 122 and 123: 122 their marriage was done by the
- Page 124 and 125: 124 (c) That when the appellant was
- Page 126 and 127: 126 This obligation is however deem
- Page 128 and 129: 128 UIN THE HIGH COURT OF THE GAMBI
- Page 130 and 131: 130 shall be filed within thirty da
- Page 132 and 133: 132 4. The fact that the appellant
- Page 134 and 135: 134 1. Fatou Dembajang- 4 years 2.
- Page 136 and 137: 136 1. Transfer the right of custod
- Page 138 and 139: 138 subsisting marriage between me
- Page 140 and 141: 140 At this juncture we requested t
- Page 142 and 143: 142 cover and having observed what
- Page 144 and 145: 144 reverted to Christianity, in th
- Page 146 and 147: 146 Pursuant to section 137A (6) of
- Page 148 and 149: 148 3. The applicants violated the
- Page 150 and 151: 150 ……….……..…..……
- Page 152 and 153: 152 clearly defined and limited the
- Page 154 and 155: 154 But at the same time if the sai
- Page 156 and 157: 156 Islamic Law. His interest in th
- Page 158 and 159: 158 contradict the provision of Sha
110<br />
before judgment is entered against him or that whether or he had more witnesses<br />
to call. If Al-Izar was not done or done after the decision the whole proceedings<br />
becomes a nullity” Despite the devastating consequences which result in rendering<br />
the whole proceeding of a court void the lower court did not apply it in the instant<br />
case.<br />
STEP 6<br />
The next and last step is judgment of the court. Although there is no<br />
unanimous and one single style of writing judgment yet it is generally believed that<br />
there are some salient points that are expected to be reflected in every judgment.<br />
They include:<br />
1. The historical background or origin of the matter the parties, the claim and<br />
cause of action and the counter claim if any.<br />
2. Analysis a d valuation of the evidence adduced.<br />
3. The submissions of plaintiff or his counsel and submissions of the defendant<br />
or his counsel. Logical or scientific of both submissions.<br />
4. The result of the analysis and conclusion of the court substantiated with<br />
authorities.<br />
5. The decision or order of the court.<br />
6. Right of appeal.<br />
Finally, the judgment of the lower court is devoid of many of the above<br />
points. For this reason and many more explained above as part of treating this issue<br />
I have no option than to resolve the issue in favour of non substantial compliance<br />
of the lower court’s proceedings with the rules of procedure.