Preface

Preface Preface

15.03.2015 Views

110 before judgment is entered against him or that whether or he had more witnesses to call. If Al-Izar was not done or done after the decision the whole proceedings becomes a nullity” Despite the devastating consequences which result in rendering the whole proceeding of a court void the lower court did not apply it in the instant case. STEP 6 The next and last step is judgment of the court. Although there is no unanimous and one single style of writing judgment yet it is generally believed that there are some salient points that are expected to be reflected in every judgment. They include: 1. The historical background or origin of the matter the parties, the claim and cause of action and the counter claim if any. 2. Analysis a d valuation of the evidence adduced. 3. The submissions of plaintiff or his counsel and submissions of the defendant or his counsel. Logical or scientific of both submissions. 4. The result of the analysis and conclusion of the court substantiated with authorities. 5. The decision or order of the court. 6. Right of appeal. Finally, the judgment of the lower court is devoid of many of the above points. For this reason and many more explained above as part of treating this issue I have no option than to resolve the issue in favour of non substantial compliance of the lower court’s proceedings with the rules of procedure.

111 Issue no.2 on whether or not the judgment of the court has satisfied the basic requirements of a valid judgment under the law and Sharia. First and fourth grounds of appeal attacked the judgment of the lower court as being wrong both in law and Sharia but no proper particulars of error or wrong was given by the appellant yet it is the duty of this court to examine the whole proceedings of the lower court including the judgment with a view to determining their compliance or otherwise with both substantive and adjectival laws. What a judgment shall contain was spelt out by rules of practice and procedure of the lower court. Order X1V rule 79 of the Cadi Courts Civil Procedure Rules has made it a mandatory requirement for a valid judgment to contain the principles of law and evidences proffered before the court to form the basis upon which the judgment must be grounded. The order reads thus: Ord. R. 79. The judgment of the court shall contain principles and evidences on which such decisions are grounded. Judgment is a court's final determination of the rights and obligation of the parties in a case, it includes an equitable decree and any order from which an appeal lies. Under Islamic law it necessarily affirms or denies that such a duty or such liability rests upon the person against whom the aid of the law is invoked. As earlier stated the ingredients which are indispensable for a valid judgment under Sharia and which the absence of any one of them renders the judgment invalid are six in number, namely: ''The judge, the plaintiff, the defendant, the subject matter in dispute and the applicable law leading to the judgment ( Qur'an or Sunnah or the Consensus) and lastly the procedure which such judgment has attained''

110<br />

before judgment is entered against him or that whether or he had more witnesses<br />

to call. If Al-Izar was not done or done after the decision the whole proceedings<br />

becomes a nullity” Despite the devastating consequences which result in rendering<br />

the whole proceeding of a court void the lower court did not apply it in the instant<br />

case.<br />

STEP 6<br />

The next and last step is judgment of the court. Although there is no<br />

unanimous and one single style of writing judgment yet it is generally believed that<br />

there are some salient points that are expected to be reflected in every judgment.<br />

They include:<br />

1. The historical background or origin of the matter the parties, the claim and<br />

cause of action and the counter claim if any.<br />

2. Analysis a d valuation of the evidence adduced.<br />

3. The submissions of plaintiff or his counsel and submissions of the defendant<br />

or his counsel. Logical or scientific of both submissions.<br />

4. The result of the analysis and conclusion of the court substantiated with<br />

authorities.<br />

5. The decision or order of the court.<br />

6. Right of appeal.<br />

Finally, the judgment of the lower court is devoid of many of the above<br />

points. For this reason and many more explained above as part of treating this issue<br />

I have no option than to resolve the issue in favour of non substantial compliance<br />

of the lower court’s proceedings with the rules of procedure.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!